Yes yes, a delightful meal Alejandro, a delightful meal Alejandro
HOWEVER
I would have preferred chili and seabass.
>>80384728
>tfw i specifically ordered chili and sea bass and alejandro the dirty wetback makes chilean sea bass instead
MY TREAT NIGGA
SPARE
>>80384707
How can even a dirty spic mishear "crab legs" for "chilean sea bass"?
ALAN
DAMN RAPTOR GURL YOU A SMART BITCH
>because when you think about it, Dr Grant, all dinosaurs are naked. Not a single scrap of clothing upon them, just as Christ intended. and it is for that reason we must be naked as well, Dr. Grant. everyone who enters the park. they all must be nude, even Alejandro. we spared no expense
>>80385412
ALANJANDRO
Another dull meal option from one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the chaos theory wizard and his pals from Jurassic Park as they fight assorted dinosaurs has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make Paleontology unscientific, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Crichton demanded the idea of Spielberg directing the series; he made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Jurassic Park series might be anti-science (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "did not believe Global Warming is a Crisis."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Crichton's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that he has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Jurassic park by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Jurassic Park at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Jurassic Park" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>80385579
You're a clever girl
>>80385651
For you
>>80385651
>>80385708
Dodgson?