>In terms of content and meaningfulness, Terrence Malick's

>>80384349
>all plebeian SJW sites
Shocker
>>80373400 #
The visual narrative is the most important aspect.
Quality cinematography isn't just empty pretty pictures but actually telling the story using visual narrative through framing and composition and the performances.
So the context is important, you can't judge it by a screenshot alone.

File: 1487081525513.jpg (1005KB, 4000x4000px) Image search: [Google]

1005KB, 4000x4000px

>hack critics hating on Malick because its trendy
>Malick critics feel the need to shoehorn in a shitty Trump reference in their review when its completely out of place

Not gonna lie, former Malick fan here. This is fucking hilarious watching Terry crash and burn. But in all seriousness we can't let this guy make any more films.

>>80384349
considering to the wonder has a strong case for being the best malick film ever I find it harder and harder to take some of these critics seriously

>All because an auteur made it, it deserves a free pass.
>There's no spectrum of quality.
>When an auteur makes it, it's an instant 10

You know how stupid you people sound?

Not going to lie, former Malick fan here. It's hilarious watching him crash and burn, but in all seriousness we can't let this hack get his hands another film camera.

>>80384349
>entertainment weekly
>variety

ill wait until real critics speak on it

>>80385367
you get one more try, don't fuck it up again

File: 1461275076182.jpg (86KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 500x500px

Richard Brody loved it, i'm good.

>>80384575

42% is actually a Fresh rating when you take the popular user rating into account. It's well within the 2-3% margin of error.