>creature/individual gets enormous >it now has comically

>>80323957
Idiot, the reflexes aren't slow, it just seems slow given the gargantuan size of the subject

>>80323957
DBZ did the opposite of this. Vegeta got faster in his ape form since his power level increased

>>80324034
That doesn't make any sense though. Why would he get slower just because he's big?

>>80324249
Because he feels in charge, yet he isn't.

>>80324249

Air resistance.

>>80324249
The nerve endings are much longer and will take that much longer to transmit signals

File: 512px-Comparison_of_surface_area_vs_volume_of_shapes.svg.png (77KB, 512x512px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 512x512px

> The researchers found that, after controlling for sex, age and temperature (it turns out your nerves are quicker when you’re warm), there was a 0.27 m/s decrease in the conduction speed of one of the leg nerves (the sural nerve) for each additional centimetre in height.

> This is interesting because it is not only a reduction in time because the same speed signal is travelling a longer distance, but it actually seems that nerve signals travel more slower through longer nerves as well, owing to the fact the nerves get thinner the longer they are.

square-cube law is also a thing. the bigger you get the more volume you will have

>>80323957
Because he's bigger gravity makes him slower

>>80324249
Because he just is.

>>80324976
So manlets are superior in every way?

>>80324249
Big animals move slow. Like giraffe and elephant. And Blue Whale. And grizzly bears. ect

>>80324249
wind resistance, longer nerves mean slower reflexes and longer muscles means slower contractions.

Look at how slowly the average elephant walks without any response to a stimulus, then look how quickly an animal like a Chihuahua or ant moves without responding to a stimulus.

>>80324896
Then why are humans faster than smaller animals?

>>80325000
This makes sense. If it was really really big it wouldnt even move, like mountains, which are huge but move really slowly.

>>80325051
human height doesn't really matter because it's not an extreme variance

if it were a 60 ft tall guy then he could very well have slower reaction time

but no manlets aren't superior at all, almost all elite athletes are over 6' tall

File: 1480521964641.gif (1MB, 300x300px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x300px

>>80323957
Otherwise they'd be overpowered

File: IMG_0245.gif (4KB, 165x115px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 165x115px

>>80325212

File: 221903.jpg (71KB, 482x461px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 482x461px

>>80325119

>gigantic creature
>does cliche roar
>nobody's ear drums get popped

File: th[1].jpg (9KB, 300x177px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 300x177px

>manlets think they make up for lack of size with speed

See JJ Watt and basically every nfl player.

>>80324249
air resistance and gravity

File: 1482205362047.jpg (221KB, 1000x1293px) Image search: [Google]

221KB, 1000x1293px

to all the armchair scientists shitting on OP:

we know that bigger creatures have slower reflexes, but the question is, why are they COMICALLY slow. comically meaning: giant creature attempts to step on human and takes 3+ seconds to do so, whereas we can easily step on a spider or ant or bug with no difficulty. or giant creature is swinging at humans on the ground and telegraphing every movement. explain how we can swat a fly out of the air with ease but a giant can't easily just grab us.

>>80325831
THANK YOU