I'm really glad that Hollywood invents tales of whites horribly

>>80165483
physicist here; let me add to this. these women were smart but not extraordinary. the calculations they were doing were tedious and difficult but nothing groundbreaking. they were just applying known methods to solve a well-defined problem. we're not talking about solving the Riemann hypothesis here, it's just basically the same shit as what your CPU does when playing Kerbal space program but done manually with slide rules.
the movie is a work of propagandistic fiction designed for idiots who don't know math and don't care about math. how many black kids will actually get interested in math or science from this? they just wanna see a black person stick it to whitey.

File: 1457884468500.jpg (108KB, 600x535px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 600x535px

>>80165547

These black women literally invented a brand new area of mathematics. :^)

https://youtu.be/vGAxf55sFLI?t=24s

File: The_Jewish_Plan.png (489KB, 3140x404px) Image search: [Google]

489KB, 3140x404px

>>80165483
It's all according to plan... albeit running a little late.

But to understand it, you have to understand the plan. (picrelated)

Of course I expect this thread to be deleted in short order now. You see... truth is not allowed on tv.

>>80165483
>>>/pol/
>>>/reddit/
>>>/s4s/

>>80165547
Yeap they were human computers, which were pretty common back when what we now call computers were rare. People employed to do regular calculations all day.

File: 1465017805822.jpg (28KB, 500x380px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 500x380px

>>80166375

>movie is released by major studio, is both a box office success and awards winner
>movie grossly misrepresents history
>we can't discuss this for some reason

Page 9 already?

wew lad

>>80165483
You do people lighten up as they get old you retard?

>>80166514
I certainly don't see anyone bitching about Braveheart. /pol/lacks just want another reason to bitch about black people.

>>80167506

Actually the oppose occurs.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20456097


>>80167509

Maybe people are talking about Hidden Figures because it was released recently?

>>80167789

*opposite

>>80167509
Every time Braveheart is brought up some butthurt English cunts always start up with the not historically accurate talk.

>>80167789
>Maybe people are talking about Hidden Figures
The only people talking about it are retarded anons who want to post "edgy" and "controversial" "LOL NIGGERS" posts, because the movie itself is forgettable and mediocre.
t. saw the movie

Let's be honest about why anons are shitposting instead of playing semantics.

>>80167987

Uh huh.

>who want to post "edgy" and "controversial" "LOL NIGGERS"

Nothing is like that ITT.

> because the movie itself is forgettable and mediocre.

Like I said previously, it's both a box office success and awards winner. If you don't like this thread you're free to go elsewhere.

>>80165483
Who gives a shit? Nobody watched this piece of shit.

File: 17021398_1785183355135629_7656050716022523835_n.jpg (128KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 960x960px

Im glad white NEETs are so eternally butthurt about these movies that they feel compelled to whine about it on their alt-right hugbox

>>80168920
It was the number one movie for weeks anon

>>80168972
Well you're posting on said hugbox. So why don't YOU fuck off?

>>80169046
>culturally appropriating another culture just because it happens to be in the same continent as your ancestors
Really makes you think.

>>80165483

Really makes you think.

>>80169671
let them have it

>>80171868

No. The truth matters more than people's feelings.

>>80171948
They might not have built it, but sub-sharan africans did contribute to Egypt.

>>80172047

I'm sure they did. Not to the extent that Afrocentric historical revisionists would have you believe though. Either way the blacks that were brought to the western hemisphere as slaves have no connection to ancient Egypt as they originated from Western Sub Saharan tribes.

Fuck off, /pol/.

File: 1456101136775.jpg (142KB, 500x375px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 500x375px

>>80172429

>it's /pol/'s fault Hollywood is lying
>calling out Hollywood's bullshit is forbidden

>>80172490
Fuck off, /pol/.

File: 1468020654858.jpg (14KB, 166x255px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 166x255px

>>80172540

File: johnsonk[1].jpg (3MB, 2400x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2400x3000px

>>80172490
If I proved you wrong would you stop listening to whatever loony keeps feeding you your bullshit?

Probably not. Just a reminder that your world view is not rooted in logic in any way.

>>80172619

Proved me wrong in what respect? What are you trying to prove with that image?

File: 0256e666de1d1148d5daf59f8a7709c7cfd87ac5465376d88be37c4cf1735433.png (446KB, 1127x733px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 1127x733px

we put yall mothafuckas on the moon n sheeit and you kept it from our black asses all this time

>>80167509
No one really bitches about how braveheart is inaccurate. The inaccuracies are just hilarious.

Like 35 year old mel gibson macking on a princess that was 3 years old when wallace was an active figure.

>>80173443

That is pretty funny.

File: 1467917199903-2.jpg (41KB, 960x733px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 960x733px

>>80172619

Are you going to offer an argument?

File: rtx1vp9z.jpg (31KB, 620x413px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 620x413px

When they pulled her out on the stage at the Oscars I could feel the confusion among the people there. They were wondering if this white lady is supposed to be black.

>>80172647
What happened to the one drop rule, you niggerloving fag?

File: johnson_and_leland.jpg (571KB, 904x680px) Image search: [Google]

571KB, 904x680px

Seriously tho? How is she black exactly?

>>80173584

What about it? I never stated that she lacked black ancestry. She obviously has a significant amount of European ancestry though, which is fairly common among African Americans of historical note.

thosewhocansee.blogspot.com/2012/02/black-history-month.html

What could be the cause of this? Why it's "Colorism" of course! Definitely no other plausible explanation exists!

>>80173523
If I wanted to argue with you about your backwards ideas I'd go to /pol/. I come here to talk about movies.

File: 09c491002fcc6dab648ee67c70588e58cd8f3132060ad18000dc765f78e65a06.png (58KB, 238x277px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 238x277px

>>80173673

lol sure thing buddy. :^)

>>80173637

ONE DROP RULE
N
E

D
R
O
P

R
U
L
E

I wouldn't be surprised if the vast majority of her genetic profile comes from Europe. She's probably 12% black at most.

>>80168972

Right. Whining about actual racism against them on basically the only place left on the internet that doesn't ban them for it. As opposed to whining about imagined slights and not being given things just because of the colour of their skin (like oscarssowhite) on every platform available and having nothing happen to them.

The same platforms that refuse to ban people who call for white genocide.

Yeah, it's totally the same.

This is why the sane people, of all colours, can't have nice things. Because of fucking morons like you.

>>80173929
Go whine about it on your fucking containment board.
No one is saying you can't do it there.

>>80165483

Even the title is ridiculous as it implies there was a deliberate attempt to keep knowledge of these women from the general public.

>>80174020
>Go (to) your fucking containment board.
>containment board
>No one is saying you can't do it there.
>But don't you dare even mention it here.
>It doesn't matter that it's a HUGE part of the movie plot.

"Fuck white people", right?

File: two other women.jpg (200KB, 898x651px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 898x651px

Whenever I see the criticism that the women in this movie weren't really black, it's always shows the picture of Katherine Johnson, who's just a really light-skinned black person. They don't show the two other women. Why is that?

File: Screen-Shot-2017-01-12-at-1.28.30-PM-253x300.png (136KB, 253x300px) Image search: [Google]

136KB, 253x300px

>>80175287

>Whenever I see the criticism that the women in this movie weren't really black

No one claimed that.

>it's always shows the picture of Katherine Johnson, who's just a really light-skinned black person. They don't show the two other women. Why is that?

It might have something to do with Katherine Johnson being the main character of the film.

And only the woman on the right of your image really looks "black".

The point of the image in the OP and the url it links to is that the narrative of the movie that these women were victims of unrelenting white racism isn't based in reality.

>>80175591
The archive says that the two racist white characters are composites of some of the supervisors at NASA that represent some of the unconscious bias and prejudice of the era. It's not a 100% truthful rendering of the story, but a streamlined story meant for the purpose of entertainment and highlighting these black female mathematicians.

>>80175950

Katherine Johnson has stated she was treated as an equal at her time at NASA. Those "composite" characters are simply the imagination of the writers of the film who made unfounded assumptions of what they thought it would have been like to be black at NASA during that era.

>represent some of the unconscious bias and prejudice of the era

So racist people existed in during that era therefore it was justifiable to lie about what these women experienced. What nonsense.

>>80176083
Again, in the archive in the OP's image, Katherine Jonhson herself said she liked the movie and said it was very accurate. So basically, it's just like any other "based on true events" movies, mostly accurate with some stuffs exaggerated to entertain/educate.

>>80176320
NO! IT'S EVIDENCE OF A LARGER CONSPIRACY AGAINST WHITE PEOPLE! I'M A VICTIM! VALIDATE ME! SOMEONE GIVE ME ATTENTION!

>>80176320

It wasn't accurate though. The narrative the movie presents is completely false, as is demonstrated in the article you're citing.

>>80176531
>A Hollywood movie based on true events punched up the story a little bit to make it more compelling.
Shocking.
Sure is a white genocide alright..

>>80176602

They were not victims of white racism during their time at NASA. They were treated as equals.

And they didn't single-handedly invent a brand new type of math never seen before to help whitey get to the moon. They were three women who were part of a team of more than 100 people.

>Sure is a white genocide alright..

Woah, nice strawman! You sure got me!

>>80173137
she looks really fucking hungry.

>>80165483
well duuuuuuuh, of course she didnt feel any segregation, because she looks so damn white

literally check your privilege

>>80168983
Yet nobody knows about it

>tfw it's impossible to just say that this film was plain bad because then i end up looking like i'm on the side of you retards
it's literally written and directed by white people and features a bunch of stereotypes patting their hair and going "mmmhmm" to shitty funk music, and the entire plot is about being a good house nigger and explicitly condemns the black panthers, but you people got so mad at it that now it's a symbol of social justice

>>80167509
make a braveheart thread then nigger

>>80165483
Fake news?

>>80177679
>check your privilege

Racists like you really need to be put down.

>>80174199
It doesn't imply that at all, you're an uneducated alt right buffoon who doesn't speak his own language

>>80177849

>tfw it's impossible to just say that this film was plain bad because then i end up looking like i'm on the side of you retards

You can avoid this if you liked 12 Years a Slave or Moonlight.

>>80165483
I hope you get something they can't diagnose.

>>80179023

Yeah, "hidden" doesn't imply that at all. Fuck off retard.

File: 1455300610655.jpg (11KB, 320x362px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 320x362px

>>80179138

why u mad tho?

>>80179284
No, it doesn't. You're an uneducated retarded cunt.

File: 8899f1b5b354e00e2a0598608d0d0de90a372044a6853ee3d9304f43ca4ee803.jpg (23KB, 640x559px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 640x559px

>>80179393

Uh huh.

>>80179494
>hidden valley

someone must have put it there xDDD

>actually being this fucking dumb

>>>/pol/

>>80179549

>what is context

Fuck off.

>>80179627
You mean the "context" of your alt right SJW agenda to claim the movie title says something it doesn't say? You babies really are a cancer on society. You can't have a 75 IQ and have opinions worth sharing. Sorry, it doesn't work that way.

>>>/pol/

>>80168983
They were basically giving away tickets for it, kids were getting dragged to it en masse

>>80179683

Are you aware of the movie's theme, or the marketing surrounding it?

>You babies really are a cancer on society.

You're clearly going into hysterics.

>You can't have a 75 IQ and have opinions worth sharing. Sorry, it doesn't work that way.

That's incredibly racist.

File: 1460133318361-1.png (186KB, 480x380px) Image search: [Google]

186KB, 480x380px

we wuz nasa n sheeit!

File: image.jpg (915KB, 1645x1920px) Image search: [Google]

915KB, 1645x1920px

The bathrooms were segregated
Women were restricted to the human calculator pool
The black women were kept on a seperate campus
Why is your photo of Johnson so light skinned compared to others?

>Whitey on the moon - gil scott-heron

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PtBy_ppG4hY

>>80165547
Before the widespread use of computers they had to have humans do the calculations
That is what is depicted in the film
There's no propaganda
You're lying or haven't seen it

>>80180500

Did you even bother to visit the site in the OP's image? The movie is mostly fiction. It's blatant propaganda.

See:

>>80165677

>>80180534
Their job as human calculators is depicted accurately

>>80180568

That was never a point of contention.

>>80180467

She looks exactly the same in both pics.