>we have reached this level of CGI
full terminator 3 with young arnold set in the future war when ?
>>80017438
I call him baby sparow
So instead of hiring a young ACTor to ACT and behave like Jack Sparrow for a prrquel scene, they decide to give johnny debt the cgi makeover?
I knew (((Disney))) has been going ridiculously jewish with their movies since owning Marvel, but they are reaching full levels of jew with their sequels and remakes.
>>80017881
how ? i'm sure it costs a lot more to cgi young depp for one scene than it would be to hire a look a like who for one scene
>>80017926
indubitably
>>80017438
wow that looks terrible, at least shrink the eyes to fit the face
>>80017438
Honestly it's not too bad.
>>80017951
>'cgi is expensive' meme
Go on and please explain to me how much more expensive it is to hire people to create effects on movies, only to have the movies look terrible.
Please tell me 90% of a movie being filmed on a green screen looks great and is worth the expensive costs, despite movies from the 90's looking better than todays.
If you seriously believe that the cgi garbage being churned out by hollywood is more expensive, than you are retarded. Cgi is the cheaper, cost and time effective method to finish movies post production. You dont have to wait for crews to work on sets, or practical effects, or even insure the crew. Just hire a dozen+ neckbears programmers to basically make the movie from green screen.
>>80017438
2 years ago in Genisys
>>80017438
Looper is going to have to be remade in a few years now that we have the tech to do a convincing young Willis. Too bad Disney probably jews people on using their techniques though.
>>80018119
>This entire autistic rant
All anon said is that it costs more to make high-level CGI like that than to hire one nobody and pay him guild minimum, and that's undeniably true.
>>80018119
[citation needed]
>>80017881
Real actors do theatre.
There's not a single big budget movie "actor" worth shit.
I can't wait to laugh at everyone here that believed that it was CGI when they confirm it's just a younger actor playing Jack.
>>80018841
Fuck off.
JGL played a perfect young Brucie
>>80020277
No fuck off
>>80018119
The Hobbit 3 is the 14th most expensive movie ever made
>>80020367
that's awful
>>80020367
>Singer thought this looked good
>>80017438
The only reason it looks passable is due to dark lighting, and even then his face looks rubbery
>>80020381
What's number one?
>>80020382
Shut up retard
>>80020466
I think it was one of the previous Pirates of the Caraberan kinos
>>80020367
>tfw
>>80020508
yikes
>>80020277
that does look pretty great. i remember when i watched the movie it really bothered me because it was so weird to see JGL not have his own face.
>>80020405
>Singer
>>80017438
CGI or CG-why?
>>80017438
>literally perfect young version of Johnny Depp available
>using shit CGI instead
What a waste
>>80018841
There isn't enough technology on the planet to make Bruce Willis look like he gives a shit.
>>80020466
PotC On Stranger Tides and At World's end as 2nd.
>>80021300
I really don't understand the praise the 4th one gets on here. There's almost no sailing, I don't think there's a single cannon fired in the entire fucking film and literally everything looks like it's taking place on a set in a hanger somewhere, even the brief moments that are "at sea" (other than that one moment where Barbossa sees the Spanish sailing off in the distance) look like they were filmed in a swimming pool.
Then you've got Blackbeard's lame-ass zombie henchmen that just look like big dudes with some scarring, Blackbeard himself barely even feels like a villain, Cruz in her pirate cosplay looking way too clean for most of the film and possibly the worst escape sequence ever put to film with Jack catapulting himself using palm trees (yes it's worse than the barrel scene in the hobbit).
>b-but mermaids
>>80018119
>>80018119
cgi is so good you dont even notice
the things that are hard to render are actual human beans and creatures alike
there are chances that big studios build rendering softwares from the scratch to get their work done which takes a lot of time
hiring an actor will always be cheap and quick
>>80021262
literally this
>>80017438
Was these also CGI?
>>80017438
Honestly it looked amazing
Young sparrow will probably be in it for like 10 15 mins at though
>>80018119
>than
>>80019269
Ian McKellan? Patrick Steward? Ed Norton? Hugh Jackman?
John Depp
>>80021776
The 4th one's great because it's just a fun pirate adventure without constantly shoe-horning in divine rights or unnecessary "epic" large-scale battles
It felt fun and didn't seem like it was trying to be anything other than what it was
>>80021262
stop posting this in all threads