>15 years of CGI technology later >1000 nvidia gtx chips

>>80003584
you are a retard if you think left looks better than right

>>80003584
>How come CGI from 2001/2002 looks better than today?

I'll bite

Perhaps it was used a little more sparingly years ago instead of the OTT usage with get nowadays.
People generally watch films in higher resolutions now than in the early 2000s. Flawed CGI becomes even more apparent compared to blurry dvds etc.

>TFW you're trying to defend your wheat field and some faggot says your CGI sucks

If you were here I swear I would headbutt your windshield you fucker.

the right alien is retarded. its out in the open, nice and bright so your brain is like "yep cgi monster, not scared"

>>80003584
>comparing aliens with demons

File: ayyy3.gif (873KB, 500x250px) Image search: [Google]

873KB, 500x250px

>>80003682
Until you realize Windows XP was the operating system it was created on and Playstation 2 was the newest console at the time.

>>80004259
So are you taking hardware improvements into account or not?

How do you know the alien is cgi and not a model in front of a green screen?

File: ayyyyy.gif (790KB, 500x271px) Image search: [Google]

790KB, 500x271px

>>80004394
because this is from 1986 and looks better

>>80004820
This.

Christ, I can already imagine this scene in a modern film with it being all CGI

File: 1475008702081.gif (79KB, 500x456px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 500x456px

>>80003584
You're clearly blind.

File: 0907 - OxAi9iC.png (28KB, 380x250px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 380x250px

>>Alien looks like ass