>finish watching movie >search youtube for a video

dumb frogposter

>still don't understand
>search youtube for video explaining the youtube explanation video

>>79922636
I actually (literally) laughed out loud at this retort

File: 1434859398137.jpg (8KB, 180x180px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 180x180px

>Finish film
>Immediately log onto /tv/ and post:
>'Well that sucked' no matter if i liked it or not

File: 1469149241757.jpg (151KB, 767x581px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 767x581px

>>79922612
I actually don't like doing this unless there's something I specifically didn't understand, like I'm trying to keep track of the timelines in Primer.

Those videos where its like, "XYZ ENDING EXPLAINED!"

Then I imagine a bunch of plebs assimilating that intel like something can only have one explanation that they heard on the internet, and then they'll spew that shit like a virus IRL.

Really touching movies, beautiful movies are delicate like Faberge eggs. If you touch them, they break. I feel like that way about a lot of things. I think some things are so beautiful that they should be locked away, or maybe only a certain number of people should be able to witness them.

It makes me sad to think people listening to some commercialized, talking head dispensing a doldrum about an easily compartmentalized meaning to something that may be way deeper.

It makes me want to kill myself.

>Finish film
>Immediately log onto /tv/ and post:
>omg you haven't seen it? wow i thought you were film experts

>>79922636
I actually (literally) laughed out loud at this retort

File: 121-jack-01.jpg (106KB, 1276x716px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 1276x716px

>youtube theory video
>"They were in a coma the whole time!"

File: 1481665145266.jpg (184KB, 731x1070px) Image search: [Google]

184KB, 731x1070px

>watch video explaining the movie before I watch the movie

>>79923423
dumb frogposter

>>79923679

I actually (literally) laughed out loud at this retort

File: 1bP4jRcXtE-12.png (22KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 300x250px

>>79922612

>finish watching movie
>go to imdb to see what people are saying about it
>...

File: 1397728621923.jpg (15KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 225x225px

>Finish watching universally critically acclaimed film
>immediately afterwards, go on a movie review website
>sort by worst review first

i almost always read the ebert review of the movie (assuming it came out before he died, RIP)

didn't always agree with his ratings but he usually brought up a point of view that i hadn't yet considered

>>79922612
I'm guilty of this for Paprika.

I couldn't believe the qt protagonist married the huge fatfuck.

>>79922612
>watch movie
>read based armond review to decide if i liked it

>>79923888
Trips of truth.

Wikipedia> imdb trivia > Ebert > Brody
is my usual course of acton.

>finish movie
>didn't get it
>don't attempt to understand it
>tell internet it sucked

File: 1486858043823.jpg (51KB, 383x367px) Image search: [Google]

51KB, 383x367px

>have movie running on my second screen
>look over a few times to get the general idea of what's going on
>google [Title] lore when it's over

File: 10300120.jpg (33KB, 500x483px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 500x483px

>Shitposting with my bros, having a laugh
>Put a movie on for background noise
>Get some snacks, have a cheeky fap
>wtf the movie ended
>post about how boring it was for months to come

File: Flag_of_Finland.svg.png (10KB, 2000x1222px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 2000x1222px

>Finnish movie
>no subtitles
>find YouTube video on how to learn Finnish after

>>79923423
Unironically dumb.

i did that with 2001 a space odessey and full metal jacket. stanley kubrick is subtle to the point of wtf is hapening

I just watch a movie and ask on /tv/ if it was good then assimilate the most reasonable looking reply I get

Or if I really liked the movie I get all smug and call it "kino" in front of people and refuse to explain