Is my head severely fucked by nostalgia or does 2003 look the

Third one does. 2003 has plastic hair and ps2 skin.

>>79785762
2003 looks the most human, but the least realistic.

>>79785762
Goku was a better Hulk than the Hulk will ever be.

>>79785762
2003 hulk doesn't even look angry

>>79785762
fist one looked like putty with no definition
you are blind

>>79785762

Your head is severely fucked.

Ruffalo Hulk looks the most photorealistic.

>>79785762
I don't know about most photo realistic but it has the best design for sure.

>>79785837
in fact he looks chill as fuck

2003 Hulk is the best Hulk. Literally too patrician for Marvel babbies high on quips.

>>79785852
something about the skin just looks very real i think

File: f317fd07fee86170775397a3054a1eec.jpg (16KB, 236x328px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 236x328px

How did they make him look so real?

>>79785762
If the models were supposed to resemble the actor portraying Banner, then yes your head is fucked because Ruffalo's looks the most photo-realistic

>>79785837
Wasn't that pretty much the point of the movie?

>>79785852
>gritty gravel skin means it looks more real

no

>>79785762
They all look terrible. I'm sorry. Only good CGI monster is Balrog.

File: Imagem9.jpg (833KB, 2331x4094px) Image search: [Google]

833KB, 2331x4094px

>>79785762
2011 version is still the best

>>79785985
>humans don't have porous skin

Are DCuckd this retarded?

File: Priyadarshan.jpg (123KB, 620x400px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 620x400px

>>79785944
It's a real actor and not a bunch of damn numbers in a computer!

>>79786013
tbqh, this. none of those look photorealistic.

File: Hulk_2003_037.jpg (13KB, 402x218px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 402x218px

>>79786051
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>79786186
Is that Richard Spencer ?

File: 3563413-1236804399-15084.jpg (404KB, 1940x810px) Image search: [Google]

404KB, 1940x810px

>>79785762
>>79785894
Why is 2008 Hulk so handsome? He looks like a green zac efron.

>>79786186
dumb frogposter

>>79786271
the chaddest hulk of them all

>>79785762
I think I'd have to see a photo of the hulk to be sure.

>>79786271
Thank Norton and his fuckhuge ego

>>79786271
The director wanted him to look like the perfect human, like an idealised statue or golden age bodybuilder.

I prefer it to the green Rufallo ape, honestly. Also the CGI for 2003 Hulk is pretty incredible for its age.

2003 is so fake it actually looks like a model from a time before CGI existed

>>79786271
Because he was played by Edward Norton.

I really like the built-fat Ruffalo ape Hulk

>>79786339
He looks nothing like Edward Norton though. If anything you'd want the Hulk to look uglier than yourself. I'm not buying it.
>>79786356 this makes sense

Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: the comic book: the movie

>>79786356
>incredible for its time
Fix'd

>>79785762
>rebooting shitty character 3 times in a decade
like batman

>>79786271
Super male vitality

>>79786339
Why would you even hire Norton, anyway? Given his reputation.

>>79786271
Everything about 2008 Hulk is cheap as fuck. Just compare these poor ass sets to the massive scope of Lee's Hulk.

File: hulk.jpg (17KB, 331x236px) Image search: [Google]

17KB, 331x236px

>>79785938
>>79785762
ang lee hulk was a shitty movie that took too long, had terrible cgi and a mess of a story
hulk looked fake, wrong color green, the retarded he grows bigger when he gets angry. dad becoming absorbing man out of nowhere

Norton hulk while not doing much impressive stuff in the strenght department looked and behaved far better and more like hulk should be.

ruffolo hulk gets used in short bursts and looks pretty good

>>79785762
I like 2008 the most but he is too handsome to be Hulk.

>>79786536
Because despite his diva reputation, he's an Oscar winning actor

>>79786571
This is the marvel cocksucker that ruined the franchise.

File: cap027.jpg (13KB, 320x241px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 320x241px

They all look like shit.

>>79785762
They really fucked up with the second one.
The other two resemble their own Banner, you can recognize them, but that other one looks fucking nothing like Norton.

Honestly for 2003 that's really impressive work. It doesn't hold up well to more recent cgi but given that it's 14 years old it's quite good. But avengers hulk is most photorealistic

>>79785762
>photo realistic

Also 2012 clearly looks most "real" or maybe it's just the darker lightning

File: 1488053162304.jpg (544KB, 1440x1755px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 1440x1755px

Add some color grading and it'd look just as realistic

>>79785762
2003 looks like a ps3 game.

>>79785808
Stop.

>>79787297
>/tv/ - Television & Film
even the tie in PS2 game HULK looked better then the movie 2003 version

>>79787289
Honestly the 2003 one looks like a real human being would look like, the second one is a joke, the third one is classic overhyped detailed shit, but humans see fake when something is too detailed. More impressionism is better, it's the same in painting, Hans Holbein the Younger painted in like single beard hairs but his painting look like uncanny wanna be humans

File: buttfuck in the pussy (2).jpg (18KB, 430x383px) Image search: [Google]

18KB, 430x383px

2012 Hulk is the only one to get laid tho.

>>79785894

wtf I hate Eric Bana now

>>79787590
The comparison is relevant, considering the graphics are computer generated.

>>79785762
i'll give you this
avengers>2003>norton

the 2003 looks more like evo morales than what you picture by "hulk" but it looked amazing for those days.
2008 looked like an action figure, awful and i was very dissapointed when that movie came out.
I loved avengers hulk when that movie came out, and i still do love that design. It's nearly perfect blend of photorealism and "fucked up face" that would belong to such monster.

>>79785796
2008 has shrek teeth

>tfw i actually like the 2003 Hulk

>>79785762
2012 is the most realistic, 2003 works fine because it's more stylised. 2008 sucks dick.

ruffalo hulk really undersells how draining the transformation should be. It would be better if he came out looking like pre-steroids rogers

>>79786536
same question but towards rdj instead.

Hulk would be better if norton was allowed his way

File: 008TIH_Debora_Nascimento_001.jpg (49KB, 852x480px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 852x480px

That factory attack scene tho

>>79786035
>not in chronological order

you dun goofed

>>79786571
holy shit that awful fucking taste

2003 hulk actually got their relationship right

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bnh2AplyKi4

File: 1488053162304.png (697KB, 433x920px) Image search: [Google]

697KB, 433x920px

Why leave out the newest iteration?

>>79785762
CG Artist here. 2003 has the best artist, 2012 has the best technology.

they should combine the two.

>>79787289
you ruined the 2003 version. congrats

>>79790800
before the 10's is when people knew how to adapt comic book movies.
spider-man, blade, hulk, even iron-man in 2008

>>79787657
I wish that anal obliteration gif of him and Scarlett Johansson existed as high res webm.

>>79785762
2003 was the worst movie I've ever seen

>>79786448
Mr Hyde wasn't a monster just a jerk

File: 45bb9e1d2dcee31566f2ecd5dc7ffea5.jpg (553KB, 1821x1508px) Image search: [Google]

553KB, 1821x1508px

>>79792492
Hyde was in fact a monstrous manifestation of mild-mannered Dr. Jekyll

>>79790933
Kek

File: Right before the BUTTFUCKING in the PUSSY.jpg (40KB, 478x522px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 478x522px

>>79791866
I wish it existed in the actual movie.

>>79786271
*path blocked*

File: 2023328-incrediblehulk_1_coverc.jpg (99KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 1280x720px

>>79786271
Looks like Mark Silvestri's Hulk.

>>79792593
No he wasn't read a book some time, Jekell was a repressed wanker, Hyde did all the shit Jekell wanted to but was to much of a puritanical pussy to actually do, Hyde was an asshole and occasional murderer he wasn't a monster

>that scene in the 2003 movie where Hulk is running and jumping in the desert
>he lands on sand and falls down
Was mildly amusing.
Some other scenes like the murder recall were pretty spooky for the young me.
2003 Hulk was quite kino.

>>79793057
>it was as if she and the knife...merged
It was pretty great, also had a much better explanation why Ross doesn't trust hulk

File: 1455941391575.jpg (47KB, 300x380px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 300x380px

>>79793014
>murderer
>not a monster

>>79794131
>tfw you sell drugs to the community.

>>79794131
Well the guy he killed was a stuck up wanker

>>79794270
That doesn't excuse it, dude

>>79794287
No still not an actual monster unless...maybe the monster is really inside all of us?

>>79794329
Perhaps, nah that would be silly

>>79794379
Yea fair point

>>79785762
>2003
Anon....I...

>>79787657
>Implying.

2003 Hulk canonically got the pussy first.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YbgPt9hkrC0

>>79785762
Uncanny Valley; the more real the less convinced you are.

>>79794873
wtf is this shit? go back

>>79786914
i feel like it's kinda embarrassing to have your face morphed like that

>>79788716
My Debrinha.

>>79785894
>>79785762
they all look like giant green men who don't exist therefore are all fake

>>79786571
Kys plebeian

>>79785762
I see it too, I think it's the lighting and that he looks like a big muscular man that was painted green, like the TV show, instead of a giant muscular man who is green, like the recent films
Also marvel films all look the same, very plain and sterile, while ang's film is separate and has its own look and style to it with no hang ups about needing to looks similar to other films tied to it.

>>79790933

dubs and a lul. Not bad. Not bad.

>>79787657
Why did they make his face look like a gorilla? Why does everything grow except his nose? He has by far the smallest nose from all of the other hulks. It looks fucking weird and I cannot not notice it anymore.

>>79785894
kek 2003

2012 by a mile.

>>79787289
wow, you did a terrible job. i hope you're retarded.

File: kirbyhulk.jpg (110KB, 600x682px) Image search: [Google]

110KB, 600x682px

>>79797360
Because that's how the Hulk originally looked.

>>79785762
2003 looks like he is literally made of the same material used to make the Hulk hand toys

2012 is by far the best, 2008 looks like shit

File: Hulk tranquil.webm (1MB, 360x194px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 360x194px

>>79785837
>>79785909
>>79785975

>>79785762
take a look again, friend. Ruffalo's Hulk has actual skin pores and human-like textures, even some persperation. IIRC they actually took full body scans of Ruffalo and stretched them to "Hulk" proportions.

>>79799101
>were going to stay true to the design of the original hulk....'s nose, the rest were going to update it and make him hip.

>>79791866
Oh man, I remember when that anon posted those on /gif/ originally. The original version didn't include Scarlett. It was just a straight loop of hulk dick. I can't recall if it was painted green or not though. But for sure, the original edit was just a huge cock. And he made a few of those too.

>>79799724
I wouldn't say he looks "hip", more like he's just visually closer to Mark Ruffalo, albeit a mutated radioactive neanderthal Mark Ruffalo.

>>79785762
That music tho

>>79785762
It doesn't look real at all
It looks the most human like I guess, which I could see some people thinking it looks more realistic.
But 2012 definitely looks technically the most realistic

File: Ang Lee's The Hulk.jpg (123KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

123KB, 1280x720px

I think people are forgetting how bad Ang Lee's Hulk movie really was

>>79794873

La puta madreee...

>>79794228
communitay

>>79800890
Ok what is that pic really from because it looks hilarious

>>79801134
the amazing bulk. The movie is essentially a series of clip arts mashed into the background of really back green screen acting. It's terrible, and not in a good way. It's just an assault on the senses.

>>79801134
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=brZH4lBt7X0

2003 was good because the Hulk actually does change size in accord with his anger level, ykno
Like hes SUPPOSED TO

I remember when I was a child I watched the 2003 Hulk DVD. The Hulk was one of my favorite super heroes and I dressed up as Halloween as him several times. Then I watched the special features because I really enjoyed the film. They were going over the CGI and how they modeled The Hulk and in one part they showed the base model naked. He had a gigantic, fat green dick and I felt extremely guilty and scared when I saw it. I couldn't believe that Marvel would allow something like that in a movie that wasn't rated R.

I no longer liked The Hulk. He wasn't a super hero I liked anymore. I never told my parents about what I saw but I prayed they never watched the special features.

2003 has Jennifer Connelly tho

Don't even need a picture

>>79785762
the latest Hulk looks better than the other ones, but I too love Hulk 2003.

Also 2003 has better motion capture than the newest hulk.

File: 619_1_1080p.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>79785762
At times hulk 2003 looked great and other times, not so great. but its still my favourite.

>>79786253
YOU CUT YOUR HAIR LIKE ME, I CUT MY HAIR LIKE YOU, YEAH NO HOMO

>>79801272
KID JUST FUCKING NOCLIPPED

>>79785894
The first one actually looks the best. The other two have more effects added to the skin to make them look more realistic, but the 2003 version is the only one to do eyes correctly. The thing with uncanny valley is that if one tiny detail looks wrong, the whole thing immediately looks wrong. There's something wrong with modern CGists and getting eyeballs right, because they never seem to suit the rest of the face.

>>79786606
kek this. but 2003 is the better looking one.

>>79786271
>think Norton's Bruce banner was best and his hulk was the coolest
>upset when Norton is replaced by ruffalo
>hate ruffalo in the avengers
>glad Norton got out of the MCU before it turned to shit

>>79785837
hulk just want to be left alone

>>79791077
blade wasnt an adaptation, it was a complete reimagining

I remember watching it way back when he fought in the desert, his ass clipped through his pants. Tell me I'm not crazy

>>79785762
hes looks like a plastic toy you twat