I just recently watched this documentary and Im wondering how heavily this was spun in their favour?
Please note Im not trying to bait anything or anyone I just genuinely want to discuss this documentary.making threads on /pol/ about stuff like this brings out biased shitposting answers and thread dead within 20 minutes
>>79774334
/tv/ is not much different from /pol/
in fact, it's not different at all.
>>79774334
I think you mean (((their))) favor.
>>79774353
except that we have baneposting, while they took pepe
ps. u r a b i g g u y
>>79774334
The blacks did 9/11
>>79774334
>making threads on /pol/ about stuff like this brings out biased shitposting answers and thread dead within 20 minutes
You are either incredibly new or extremely retarded if you think it'll be any different here
Who was in the wrong here?
>>79774468
thanks for the useless post
>>79774470
|
|>
|
|3
|
|
90% of this movie isn't even about Hillary. It's about the "Democratic" Party in the 1800s, which doesn't resemble the democratic party today.
>>79774470
It's always the critics who are wrong in situations like these.
>>79775907
Semiotics has gone too far
Pretty accurate.
The left and their ridiculous claim that the parties switched platforms.