Thread replies: 13
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1
File: eisenberg-lex-luthor-186700.png (294KB, 655x401px) Image search:
[Google]
294KB, 655x401px
Why couldn't the movies have a good Lex Luthor?
Even a CW show did it better: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aUleoZCeL4Q
>>
because zack snyder always aims for the fences and strikes out
>>
>>79758623
But i thought /tv/ loved snyder
>>
>>79758584
It didn't just have a good Luthor. It has a *redifining* depiction of Luthor. Hackman did it in the 70s. Eisenberg has done it for the new millennium. The only difference is that the audience who watched the original in the theaters didn't consist of whiny, unimaginitive retards.
>>
SOMEBODY SAVE ME
>>
>>79760342
JUST SAVE
>>
>>79758976
>/tv/ is one person
>>
He was very good, gleefully villainous and sorta pathetic not unlike Kylo Ren, plus it was an origin story.
Luthor > > > zEmo
>>
>>79760402
I always just figured it was one NEET replying to themselves all day.
>>
>>79760457
>tfw use 2 devices with different IPs to reply to myself
Fuck
>>
>>79760457
>one NEET
We have to sleep mate, there's a couple more than that
>>
>>79760570
Normie
>>
>>79758584
>1 movie of character development vs. 7 20 some episode seasons of character development
Thread posts: 13
Thread images: 1
Thread images: 1