>star destroyer crashes into planet >doesn't leave

>>79729791
I would assume it crashed in a partially controlled descent, rather than in a free fall.

Like, it was in the upper atmosphere and became too badly damaged for the engines to keep it aloft, but they still slowed it down as it was falling.

>>79729791
sand would fill it up

It didn't crash yesterday retard. A desert has a lot of sand storms which would eventually cover up a lot of the evidence of a crater.

>>79729791
Something that big would've also released a shockwave that would've leveled everything around it for thousands of miles. That little dune in the foreground would be gone. The sky would be blocked by dirt clouds.

>>79729941
I hate sand

>>79729791
>Title credits
>Just floating in empty space
>How is this realistic in any way?

>>79729914

pretty much how they showed it in the battlefront game

>>79730194
>characters doing one thing
>screen wipe
>characters doing another thing

>>79729791
Because it happened a long time ago in a galaxy far, far away.

>>79729791
because the bigger spaceships in Star Wars are better thought of as huge ships that float through the aether, not realistic depictions of how a spacecraft would work

Think of Star Wars as a fairy tale with futuristic technology and aesthetics

>>79729791
sand is soft retard, the ship just sunk right in

File: star wars.webm (2MB, 500x280px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 500x280px

>>79729791
maybe it wasn't going too fast

File: QWv6f.jpg (133KB, 1536x643px) Image search: [Google]

133KB, 1536x643px

>>79729791
Imperial class can enter the atmosphere and hover but do not have landing gear

>>79730481
Seems like a design oversight