In the neoliberal west, film is mostly unheroic smut and consumer

>>>/reddit/

>>79592875
t.reddit

Mel Gibson is a billionaire who not only owns a film studio but also owns a distribution company. By his own admission, the only thing "constraining" him is his desire to use other people's money to fund his filmmaking.

Mel Gibson has the means and mechanisms to make films. He is not being constrained by anything except his own greed.

>>79592856
If this question was posed in a more intelligent way, it would actually be a good one.
We'd get more celebration of collectivism and less individualistic heroes.
Less "rebel" and "renegade" heroes.

Sooner or later anon, mark my words, those ideals will make a comeback.

But it will be much more reasonable and less violent than you'd hope.
Life, war and political change are more mundane and glamourless than /pol/ would have you believe with their maniacal narrative.

Also
>woman director

>>79592856
Unheroic? Please elaborate.

>>79592856
actually one of the most boring movies I've ever seen. Only good parts were Hitler's speeches. The rest was german landscapes that got old fast and dragged on forever.

>>79592856
you are deranged

>>79592995
>Life, war and political change are more mundane and glamourless than /pol/ would have you believe with their maniacal narrative.

t. atheist ubermensch

>>79592856
Germany made plenty of commercial films under Hitler too

I'm sure Fascist propaganda would look just like capitalist advertisements today.

>>79593215
Definitely not as Fascism has moral constraints that would sift through the base, degenerate essence of advertisement.

>>79592930

Nowadays you don't even need that much money to make a good movie.

>>79594297
yup