Does anyone else remember when hagrid spoiled the fact that Harry

Not many people know about this, I'm convinced jk had the scene removed...also bump

i don't even remember what i did last week you fucking nerd /lit/ reject

I don't know what any of that means because I'm not a child

>>79581277
My short term memory is hazy due to being high af most of the time but I still remember obscure shit like this

>>79580775
Explain you faggot

Anyone remember when billionaire JK Rowling demolished her neighbor's house to make her garden bigger and has 3 empty mansions with 18 bedrooms and spends her days whining on twitter about how we need more immigrants and yet won't house any of them herself?

File: 1482061719719.jpg (724KB, 1456x1776px) Image search: [Google]

724KB, 1456x1776px

No but but I do remember this being one of the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody, just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

haha

>>79581345
There is a scene between Harry and hagrid on the Hogwarts express where he mentions Harry's scar, how it is a part of Voldemort that will forever be a part of him.

>>79581396
you are now aware she is a billionaire precisely because she pushes the jew agenda

>>79581396
Is this true? Why are liberals such hypocrites?

>>79580775
>>79581226
>>79581345
>>79581423
You are cucking yourself by not turning your brain off during the movie in case of potential spoilers. I don't pay attention when they talk for the first 4-5 times I watch a movie just in case.

File: agreeable_jay.gif (916KB, 250x219px) Image search: [Google]

916KB, 250x219px

>>79581474

>>79581331
Literally me

>>79581567
Why does /ourguy/ look like a Numale #66272

File: IMG_6718.jpg (30KB, 456x402px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 456x402px

>>79581647
>friend simulator for /tv/irgins
>/ourguy/

File: deletethis.jpg (41KB, 443x399px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 443x399px

>>79581721

By that time even Rowling had no idea that Harry was a horcrux.

>>79583082
bitch had no idea about writing at all

>>79583082
Maybe she had it cut it out of the movie and stole the idea