>What if Disney botched Episode VII, came to you and said,

>>79504725
>Could you see that happening?
No

I wish though

File: image.jpg (196KB, 880x679px) Image search: [Google]

196KB, 880x679px

They've burned their bridges with GL

>>79504725
I feel like George had this dream every night after he made the sale

>>79504838
>4 Billion dollars counts as burning bridges

Yeah. They really screwed him on that huh?

File: 2F61288C00000578-0-image-m-48_1450149897548.jpg (94KB, 634x634px) Image search: [Google]

94KB, 634x634px

>nah, I ain't gonna do it
>*sips coffee* MMMMMM

>>79504725
can somebody post that pic which star wars movies, series, books are now canon?

>>79504941
>those shoes

What did George mean by this?

>>79504725

>"Hmmmm, depends."
>"Depends on what?"
>"Who has the high ground?" *spins*

>>79504725
No, yeah, lets get the sperg who ruined star wars to shit on it some more.

>>79506523
this

>>79506523
>George Lucas
>the sperg who ruined star wars
You millennials sure know how to rustle a guy's jimmies

>>79506523

I'm not justifying the prequels, but he did make Star Wars. If he wants to destroy it, fine; he created it. It's not J.J. Abrams coming in and botching it, because he had no right to.

>>79506721
prequels where bad

Force Awakens a lazy rehash

>>79504838
>>79504898
I'd say the bridges are mutually burned at this point. Disney burned their bridges with George when they said that he would still act as the "gatekeeper of the lore" or something along those lines and then tossed his ideas in the trash after the sale. George then burned the bridge by airing the issue in public, whining in interviews like a manchild, and calling Disney a bunch of "white slavers"

>>79506586
Speaking of rustled jimmies, George Lucas is living proof that no matter how rich someone may be, they can still become ass-blasted