ITT things plebs say that make you mad >Star Wars is sci

>What? You can't kill off the girl! Why would they do that?

>the villain can't win! Why would I want to watch a movie where the bad guy wins?

>this makes no sense

>There has to be a love interest!

File: 390257239.jpg (5KB, 200x192px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 200x192px

>It has great cinematography
>It had great 'world building'

But starwars is sci fi.
Science fantasy is still science fiction you fuck.

>>79471659
It's a space opera fucko

>>79471556
Cinematography is important you doofus

>>79471082

>Star Wars is sci fi

Its shitty pseudo-fantasy in a soft sci-fi setting.

>special effects don't matter, it's the story that counts

Youre probably the kind of person who shits on Avatar.

>when a dumb character does something dumb and plebs confuse that for bad writing

You mean like in horror films?

>just turn your brain off

DUDE ITS SUPPOSED TO BE 100% REALISTIC, OR I CANT HANDLE IT.

>Inception is a smart movie

I didnt know films had IQs.

>this is too weird

Watch Holy Mountain and then come back.

>not enough action

Like Godzilla?

>using "fun" as a euphemism for generic trash

You mean like any James Bond film? Any action film?


You have autism.

>>79471976
>>79471976
I think his point is more that most people say that while not knowing what cinematography actually is. They see a movie with wide landscape shots and say it had "10/10 cinematography"

>>79471991
>I didnt know films had IQs.

And you have the nerve to call someone else autistic.

>>79471991
What points are you trying to make here? You're just babbling like a spastic retard.

>>79471082
>when a dumb character does something dumb and plebs confuse that for bad writing

Ridley Scott owes everybody an apology for Prometheus.

>There's an alien vagina snake hissing at me
>Maybe it's friendly
>Let me take off my helmet and touch it

>Giant circular spaceship crashes and starts rolling after me
>Run away from it in a straight line

>>79471991
I agree with most of what you say but you present it in an unrelatable and rude way

>>79472530
>>79473488
>>79472050

Autism is sad.

>>79471082
>star wars takes place in the future

>>79471082
>TDKR is Kino

>using fun as a euphemism for generic trash
Same deal with videogame reviews too. How can anyone cite fun as a metric for a movie/games quality when fun is subjective? Just explain what you liked about it that made it fun.