Yes, yes, well done, Slytherin. Well done...however... We must

>>79457648
TEN POINTS FOR GRIFFENDOR

Realtalk are the only jobs in the HP universe

1. Shopkeep
2. Professor
3. Ministry worker

File: 14872036058981.jpg (3MB, 1685x2860px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1685x2860px

Interesting question, but not even tax laws are as boring as the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>79457700
Who needs jobs when there literally a slave race to do basically anything and everything for you and for everything else there are spells

>>79457700
Real talk. No. There were other jobs that Rowling wrote as socialist giveaway jobs for people that cant fit into those 3. Mr. Filch was a janitor for some reason, even though shit gets magically cleaned up.

Also, the population of wizards is small enough to not demand an excess of careers, and magic is so infinite, that people can specialize in a type of magic and be a rare commodity.

Also, they had to have some tax preparers, tax auditors, tax accountants, etc.

>>79457700
Ollivander was a wand maker but there were only like 3 in the entire of england apparently.

>>79457700
Why were the (((goblins))) the only ones allowed to be wizard bankers?

>>79457700
Lockhart was a writer.
Bill Weasley works as a curse breaker for Gringotts.
Charley Weasley tames dragons in Romania.

>>79457700
Krum was a professional quiddich player which is technically a job.

>>79457700
Just including the ones we see or are almost directly referenced in the books

Beast Researcher
Beast Slayer
Dragon Wrangler
Botanist
Wizard Cop
Journalist/Gossip monger
Train Conductor
Seer
Quidditch Player
Quidditch Announcer
Nurse/Doctor/Magical Insane Asylum Caretaker
Dark Wizard Henchman
Potionist/Alchemist
Brewer
Magical Confectionist
Broom maker
Robe Maker
Banker
Bank Guard
Bank Trap Enchanter
Bus driver
Jailor
Novelty/Prank Manufacturer
Owlkeeper

>>79457810
Because usury was a wizarding sin

Did GRRM write this?

>>79457700
Autismbucks. You fail dumbass.

File: going to die.png (11KB, 255x247px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 255x247px

>however-posting never became a huge /tv/ meme