Honestly.. I don't get it. Yeah, he's got great hair,

>>79448558
I'm honestly not sure.

Tell me why you're right.

>>79448558
I love Dune, not even trolling

File: Inland_lelmpire.jpg (7KB, 400x216px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 400x216px

At least he is doing something interesting with his craft, unlike the thousands of Michael Bay clones out there

His work is mentally challenging, you are just mentally challenged

>>79448600
Popular opinion would make me believe I'm wrong.
But I'm not really getting anything out of these.
His style is apparent, you can tell immediately, but is it as good as his reputation?

>Twin Peaks was great
>FWWM was great
>Blue Velvet was great
>Lost highway was great
>Dune was great
>Mulholland dr was great

Hmm I am seeing a pattern here.

>over rated
The most meaningless term ever. How about you just judge art on it's own merits instead of using other popular opinion to decide what you should like?

>>79448601
same

>>79448624
>His work is mentally challenging
Yeah.. nah..

>>79448601
FATTTTHERRRRRR

File: 1445205729499.jpg (23KB, 448x373px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 448x373px

>>79448558
My biggest issue with Lynch is that his voice doesn't match his baddass looks

File: tmp_5022-21f-1892323035.gif (1MB, 405x405px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 405x405px

You aren't important and your opinion doesn't matter.

>>79448639
>great
Entertaining =/= great

I didn't say I didn't like them. But, would I call them great. No.
Not intellectually, not stylistically, not the writing or the dialogue.
Nothing about them is great or inspiring.

>>79448668
He has awesome voice

>>79448638
>His style is apparent, you can tell immediately, but is it as good as his reputation?

I like to think so, but I guess you don't. Why?

>>79448643
That's literally what I'm doing in this thread.

>>79448676
>I'm not articulate enough to express my opinions
ok

>>79448686
He inspired a ton of people, wtf are you talking about?
>not stylistically
Oh, fuck off

>>79448686
>Not intellectually, not stylistically, not the writing or the dialogue.
>Nothing about them is great or inspiring.

So it's bad to you? I don't really get these flat out negatives about Lynch's works that you are making, be more specific.

>>79448686
Well you're wrong.

>>79448558
Twin Peaks is pseud trash.
Mulholland Drive was sort of neat I guess.
Eraserhead was stimulating


Meh

>>79448558

He made the most awesome Playstation ads ever.

Hitchcock. a master of frame, suspense, and editing.
that's a man who's work holds against his reputation.

Lynch is a good film student with a budget.

>>79448746
>>79448744
>You're wrong
I know that already. At least in the public eyes.
I asked why I'm wrong.. can you tell me?

>>79448718
No you aren't. You're pooling opinions and using the popular opinion to make up your mind. Grow a pair you woman

>>79448839
My opinion is not popular opinion.
I don't why you're mad. Is it because you can't tell me what makes him good?

>It's good because I was told it's good
/tv/ in a nutshell.. my work here is done..

>>79448820
Then I guess it's because you don't find appealing what you get about Lynch's works. It's not like everything can be grasped after you watch them for the first time or know basic stuff about filming, but then again it's not really that complex to begin with, from a surface level. To each their own.

>>79448558
Why the fuck are you talking like that? You sound like an ultra faggot