Why didn't he build a base for his death eaters on the Moon?

wizards are like black people, incapable of innovation.

>>79446697
Apparition has distance limitations.

Why didn't he steal a nuke and use it on Hogwarts also in the movie that one fuck did not know what a rubber duck was do they know about guns

>>79446748
reminds me of Magical Index

If he could have hid it there, Dumbledore could have found it.

What's more important, Dumbledore found the most difficult horcrux but couldn't get any of the rest. Seriously, the room of requirement and Gringotts? That should be child's play for him.

File: 1476931664243.jpg (1MB, 1596x2850px)

1MB, 1596x2850px

Why didn't noseless man just cast himself out of dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.

>>79446739
He doesn't need to aparate, he can fly after all.

>>79446697
Because non of that exists.

>>79446818
http://archive.4plebs.org/tv/search/image/18UHPhXvkYHfAyNAG6C_Dw/

pure autism

>>79446818
Terrible opening, apply yourself

>>79446811
>he finds the most difficult horcrux when he didn't even know it was a horcrux
>he lets 12 year old Harry walk around with another one for months

File: 1466016618123.jpg (362KB, 900x1200px) Image search: [Google]

362KB, 900x1200px

why do numales and nufemales look for logic in childrens movies?

>>79446833
Given the scientific knowledge of the wizarding world, Voldemort probably thought the world was flat at that the sky and moon was a flat barrier or something.

>>79446818
I love /lit/posting

>>79446811
He went after the one with a lethal trap first by pure bad luck and was in a bad way afterward.