>when they cast an unattractive woman to play someone who's supposed to be attractive
she's cute af with big tits.
i miss her career
>when they cast a homosexual OP to make a thread that's supposed to be heterosexual
>>79371055
>literally everything with Ariana Grande, the ape
>>79371339
You call yourself heterosexual when you're attracted to that face?
To be fair, Mary Jane is not required to be drop dead sexy. Spider-Man is the one hero you can believe that would date a more "normal pretty" type of girl instead of a super model.
Casting Emma "fairly pretty girl next door" Watson as one of the prettiest fucking Disney princesses, however....
>>79371458
>worrying about the face and not the tits
shut up, faggot
>>79371492
but Mary Jane is a super model in the comics
>>79371339
So pwetty :3
>>79371458
wtf are you talking about? If that looks like a man, then you're probably from some faggot nation like Canada.
>>79371616
You're right, but the movies always made their own version of things. What I'm saying is that she was fine for the Mary Jane created for those movies.
It'd be different if Thor'a girlfriend is an average-pretty looking girl (Natalie Portman is hot even if she's older now). Toby's Spider-Man would never be able to date a super model.
>>79371616
Peter is also handsome in the comics
>>79371055
shit taste