If /tv/ think they are hot shit why doesn't /tv/ make an

Nobody thinks it can be done?

>>79284188
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qS0E0A1gJqU

>>79284507
>>79284188
>I'm a moronic newfaggot who can't even use a search engine

I don't think even editing can fix those. I'd have to make it from scratch.

>>79284188
The people who edited IV had all the takes at their disposal.

>>79284695
Most fan edits I've seen are shit

Including this one
>>79284655
Give me a good one if you know of one

>>79284789
Yes but this would be editing down episode ii and iii into one condensed film

>>79284825
>having more scenes is the same as having different takes of the same scene

File: 16250.jpg (8KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 225x225px

I always thought those movies would be better if they had the plane scene from dark knight rises.

>>79284188
The prequels are hard to edit, they're so dense, every single image has so many things going on.

>>79285096
I didn't say that.

Here's the thing OP, Star Wars had all the necessary elements to make a great film in editing.

No editing trickery can fix the boring, non-sensical plot, lack of interesting characters or shitty video game special effects of the Prequels.

>>79284188
I could potentially be edited into a good film. II and III are pretty much unsalvagable. The way they were filmed (constant CGI backdrops, boring walk and talk) and the horrible dialogue would render even the best of edits as shit.

File: snorr.jpg (290KB, 1873x1857px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 1873x1857px

>>79284188
>I
>it's not that bad