Should WB go back to making standalone dc movies like Watchmen?

no, they just need to make a stand alone Batman film with Batfleck

>>79266593

>Watchmen Box Office
>Budget before marketing = $130 million
>Box Office takings before taxes = $180 million

nope. it bombed hard and DC will never attempt that shit again.

>>79266732
>and DC will never attempt that shit again.
Attempt what? Comic book adaptations? You're a little late for that one, buddy.

>>79266778

No, an intellectual graphic novel adaptation.

File: 1486661745975.jpg (65KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

65KB, 768x1024px

>Affleck not directing.
>Terrio rewriting the script
>Warner Bros. is already speaking to several filmmakers about taking over in the director's chair Matt Reeves, who seems to be the frontrunner
Just let it die and restart from 0 with new cast and movies its time this DC mess to end

>>79266732

It made a killing on blurays though, only turboblockbusters made the budget back on theater gross now

>>79266811
>intellectual graphic novel
Stopped reading there.

File: 1476384951401.jpg (3MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3840x2160px

>>79266593
Probably. DC has a load of cool characters that could carry their own film without the whole "Cinematic Universe" nonsense bogging them down.

>Swamp Thing
>Plastic Man
>The Question
>Shazam
>Kamandi: The Last Boy on Earth
>Challengers of the Unknown
>Amethyst of Gemworld

Too bad WB has no faith in B and C-listers and Nolan and Snyder poisoned the creative well with their grim contempt for the source material

Will dumb normies accept standalone films anymore?

>>79266881
>now

it was almost 10 years ago