I finally got around to watching this. It was pretty underwhelming,

You shouldn't mention your age if you are so criminally underage.

You shouldn't have reddit spacing if you want to have a worthwhile "discussion" here.

Your grammar sucks.

Discuss.

I was initially disappointed because it left the ocean so quickly, but the characters were adequate. I wanted highly detailed reefs and ocean exploration, and instead it seems they used the detail in textures and particles. I didn't notice that much of a visual improvement over Finding Nemo.
And the parents waiting outside of the pipes was retarded both in terms of logic and in terms of a shitty resolution to the story.

>>79210634
21 is not underage.

If this is how reddit spaces things (I wouldn't know cause I don't go there, but I'll trust your expertise), then that's a plus for them. This is easier to read.

Who cares about grammar?

Yeah the parents waiting there was a lame resolution

File: image.jpg (120KB, 970x647px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 970x647px

I agree. The whole thing felt phoned in. But I suspect it's the age thing because my nephews and their friends thought it was even better than the first one when I took them to see it.

>>79210496
I liked the physical comedy with the octopus, but that's literally it. Pixar has made exactly one good sequel and that's Toy Story 2.

>>79210496
Finding Dory > Finding Nemo

sure, i loved it too, as a kid, but on a rewatch Nemo is one of the lesser Pixar efforts imo

The intro made me wish we could get a fish movie without dialogue. It would be impressive to see a tale about a fish trying to find her way home without relying on "oh no the baby voice is sad".
>related
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZGUs_Eqd3zY

>>79211174
As someone who thinks Finding Nemo is one of the best Pixar movies, I agree it was pretty simple on a recent rewatch. It's just a perfect execution.
For instance, P. Sherman 42 Wallaby Way Sydney, Australia feels like something that is naturally ingrained into your subconscious as you watch the movie. However, "The Jewel of Morro Bay California" is hammered into dialogue like 12 times within the first 30 minutes and then doesn't even have any real payoff to the phrase.

It's a kids movie faggot. They're not trying to impress you. Go back and watch Nemo without the nostalgia glasses and you'll realize it's actually pretty unremarkable.

>>79210496
Same here, its more kiddie oriented tbqh. Toy Story 3 is probably the last one i enjoy from Pixar. I am quite surprised 'Dory' got that much critical acclaim, but i guess that's different taste.

who /thought that Toy Story 3 was overrated/ here?

wasn't bad by any means, but it didn't live up to the first 2 in my eyes.

File: 1scymrpw.wizardchan.1353734659631.gif (509KB, 499x428px) Image search: [Google]

509KB, 499x428px

>>79211425
>I am quite surprised 'Dory' got that much critical acclaim, but i guess that's different taste.
It's funny because that's the general opinion of Toy Story 3 on here.

I'm disappointed Newt got cancelled, and that the Last Dinosaur has that unwatchable art style. I wish Pixar would come up with a new idea. I also wish I didn't just google 'Pixar movies'.
2017: Cars 3
2018: Incredibles 2
2019: Toy Story 4

>>79211374
You sound like you're trying to impress someone.

>>79211559
I think its as good or even better than the second at least. Good story, decent villain, and the theme actually hit closer to home for me, we have been built up with this theme of maturity since the second and to finally see how it plays out is quite satisfying.

>>79210911
21 is not underage. If this is how reddit spaces things (I wouldn't know cause I don't go there, but I'll trust your expertise), then that's a plus for them. This is easier to read. Who cares about grammar? Yeah the parents waiting there was a lame resolution

21 is not underage.
If this is how reddit spaces things (I wouldn't know cause I don't go there, but I'll trust your expertise), then that's a plus for them. This is easier to read.
Who cares about grammar?
Yeah the parents waiting there was a lame resolution

How are either of these hard to read?

It really wasn't good. Nemo and Dad barely had anything of consequence to do, so much that when they did appear it felt like obligatory filler. Having them lost in the same building is not nearly as dramatic as lost across the ocean

I wrote a 200 word essay last year about Finding Nemo and how the villain in the film was humans.

What the fuck is the antagonist of Finding Dory? What's the message?

>>79210496
>was there something objectively lesser about this one

It was a number of things, but one of them was definitely the setting.

Yes they both take place underwater, but Finding Nemo took place in australia. Something about the those aussie accents, and just taking place around locations like the great barrier reef, the Sydney harbour etc just made it different and unique from most american-made movies

>>79210496
> let me lecture you on the cinema quality of a child's movie

Don't you have a pepe macro to be posting in /poz/

>>79213354
> bingle tucka walla dickey doo mate
no, you're still unimportant

>>79211374
No
Finding Nemo is objectively animated kino