Thought on this? It was pretty decent to me but the bad CGI really

My bad for making a thread about an actual movie. I forgot that /tv/ only discusses Game of Thrones, underage girls, farts, feet, comic book shit, and star wars.

>>79171209
Yeah it was, I'm really glad they didn't use the alternate ending for the box office it would have sucked ass, however I didn't feel the CGI was poor or in anyway ruined the experience

>>79171510
>waaah bloo bloo muh thread ;(
Maybe make it about something that hasn't been discussed to the nth degree
It came out a decade ago and is pretty shallow, what do you want people to say
It's not great

>>79171209
I thought it was subpar but I can't recall why

>>79172668
this. bad CGI always comes to mind, but that couldn't have been the only thing.

>>79171209

The professor in my Film and Lit class says the book it's based on is god tier but the movie is shit. Is he right?

>>79171209

The ending was retarded and rendered the title and major theme of the novel pointless. Also the vampire CGI was embarrassing upon release.

First half hour with Will wondering through post apocalyptia is entertaining though.

File: 1478249714277.jpg (29KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 500x500px

>>79171510
>ten minutes pass
>"w-why hasn't anyone replied to my thread"

jesus, you know how slow /tv/ is, right? this thread will be up for another six hours at least even if no one else replies to it.

>>79171209
Only thing memorable is when the dog was bitten and he had to kill her. I think I cried.

File: NO!.jpg (82KB, 450x299px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 450x299px

NO!

>>79172668
> I can't recall why
I can. Will Smith is no Charlton Heston.

File: iamlegend.jpg (543KB, 800x1222px) Image search: [Google]

543KB, 800x1222px

>>79172769
Yes he is.