Watched this for the first time yesterday. Should I watch

>>79166396
No.

the Nic Cage one is funny, but it contains nothing that is great about the first one. Really up to your affinity for Nic Cage.

It's not worth wasting your time watching the Nick Cage one.

>>79166396
NONONONONONO NOT THE BEES

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v_mW8mBzmHo

this and the 'flubber as a horror' are the best trailer genre benders

File: wicker-man-2006-nicholas-cage-bear-suit.jpg (105KB, 600x277px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 600x277px

>>79166396
the remake is unintentional comedy, but the director did make a follow up a few years ago i think. i saw a little of it and it had a scene with christopher lee and also a scene where a bunch of naked people chased someone down and ate them.

>>79166396
Watch the director's cut or final cut of the original instead

File: 1485233716066.jpg (41KB, 960x904px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 960x904px

>>79166396
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8UOtscTCJBk
is Wicker Man the only film with wiccan/pagan feels?

As silly as the nic cage one is, i found the final scene to be disturbing as fuck, even the bees. Can you imagine sitting inside the wicker man with broken legs, a crazy fever from all the bee stings, looking down and seeing your daughter light it on fire to burn you alive?

>>79166396
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e6i2WRreARo


watch this and you've seen everything worth watching (worth because of how bad it is)