which one do /tv/ prefer the most -Harry Potter -Star Wars

Is that trump? Why isn't he obese like in real life?

LOTR>Star Wars>Harry Potter

>>79160635
pretty much

>>79160498
stop getting your photos and videos of him from CNN

it's a well known fact that they doctor it to make him look fat

File: 1478745924349.jpg (189KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1920x1080px

>>79160336

Basically you're asking which had the best porn adaptation right?

- Hairy Pooter

/ thread

>>79160336
Cricket Donald?

>>79160336
Harry poofter is for children

>>79160336
Lord of the Rings. Don't care for the other two at all, really.

>>79160336
lotr

>>79160336
Star Wars by a mile.

Never liked Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings is OK

As for their fanbase

LotR > Star Wars > Potter
Although the last two has a lot of cross over.

>>79160336
StarWars OT >= LOTR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>.Harry Potter

>>79160336
LOTR>Star Wars OT>kino>Harry Potter 1>films>Harry Potter 2 and 3>flicks>The Hobbit>Star Wars prequels>Harry Potter 4-8

Fellowship of the Ring > Two Towers = Return of the King = L8WRTR Star Wars Prequels = Elect Harry Potter movies by taste > Rest of Harry Potter = Star Wars Original > Star Wars Prequels

LotR movies here extended edition ofc

File: 0FD4DE11_1574_41B7_A825_A3A058071753_28406_000012956AE26594_tmp.jpg (1MB, 1578x2842px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1578x2842px

-One of the dullest franchises in the history of movie franchises. Each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.

Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.

>a-at least the books were good though r-right
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."

I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
-Star Wars
-Lord Of The Rings


FTFY

Star Wars. Never seen LotR because it doesn't look interesting to me. Same goes for Harry Potbelly. I hate all of the fanbases as well. If I hadn't been exposed to Star Wars as a kid I probably wouldn't care much for it either.

>>79163543
>Same goes for Harry Potbelly.

dam that was a good one lol

Star Wars OT > LotR OT > Star Wars PT > Star Wars Mouseboi edition > Hobbit trilogy > Harry Potter