First one is kind of underwhelming so far. Are the others

no. shitty director and literal who actors.

the second is one of my favorite movies

third is quite entertaining as well

Third is great and far more visceral than the first one, though i'm not sure if you would dig it if you didn't like the first

>>79138826
Second is the bet movie but 3 is my favorite because the main character is the best. I thought 1 was the weakest of the 3 actually but that's because I really hated Frank, what a piece of human garbage.

>>79138826
only the slavic mob is interesting

>so far

1 gets better towards end

2 is good

I've never watched 3 but based on these comments I will watch it

>>79138826
I also didn't enjoy the first. So if we have similar tastes, you'll enjoy the third so much.

File: mads-mikkelsen-85th-annual-oscars-01.jpg (160KB, 689x1000px) Image search: [Google]

160KB, 689x1000px

>>79138881
>literal who actors

To me it's 3>1>2.
All of them great. Definitely worth the watch. If you found 1 underwhelming you might enjoy 2 more, it's more drama.

>so far

If you're posting on /tv/ while watching a movie, you're the problem, not the movie.

2 > 3 > 1 tho