Let me see. Red hair... vacant expressions... tatty second hand book... you must be the Weasleys.
doubles
>>79120941
And you must be voldemort's bottom bitch
>>79120955
>>79120955
wew lad
>>79120968
Lmao, I'd like to see his reaction to that, complete frame wreckage.
>>79120941
Let me see... gloomy imagery... lack of excitement .... stretched legs... you must be the dullest franchise.
>a blonde haired blue eyes white male is evil
Well what else did you expect from one the dullest franchise in the history of movie franchises? Seriously each episode following the boy wizard and his pals from Hogwarts Academy as they fight assorted villains has been indistinguishable from the others. Aside from the gloomy imagery, the series’ only consistency has been its lack of excitement and ineffective use of special effects, all to make magic unmagical, to make action seem inert.
Perhaps the die was cast when Rowling vetoed the idea of Spielberg directing the series; she made sure the series would never be mistaken for a work of art that meant anything to anybody?just ridiculously profitable cross-promotion for her books. The Harry Potter series might be anti-Christian (or not), but it’s certainly the anti-James Bond series in its refusal of wonder, beauty and excitement. No one wants to face that fact. Now, thankfully, they no longer have to.
>a-at least the books were good though
"No!"
The writing is dreadful; the book was terrible. As I read, I noticed that every time a character went for a walk, the author wrote instead that the character "stretched his legs."
I began marking on the back of an envelope every time that phrase was repeated. I stopped only after I had marked the envelope several dozen times. I was incredulous. Rowling's mind is so governed by cliches and dead metaphors that she has no other style of writing. Later I read a lavish, loving review of Harry Potter by the same Stephen King. He wrote something to the effect of, "If these kids are reading Harry Potter at 11 or 12, then when they get older they will go on to read Stephen King." And he was quite right. He was not being ironic. When you read "Harry Potter" you are, in fact, trained to read Stephen King.
>>79121018
>>79120997
Well done, pasta anon, well done...HOWEVER.
>>79120997
i genuinely laughed for a solid minute at this, started crying tears of joy
what's wrong with me?
>>79120997
This is funnier than every single post the pasta nigger has made or will ever make put together.
TOASTING IN AN EPIC BREAD XD
>>79120955
heh, triples
>>79120955
>>79122001
so close.