What are some number 4 sequels in a series that actually didn't turn out to be complete shit /tv/?
Star Wars: A New Hope
>>79095801
Alien > Aliens == Alien 3 (AC) > Alien Resurrection > Prometheus
Scorcher IV was pretty good
>>79095801
Rambo 4
Harry Potter 4
>>79095801
Nothing wrong with Resurrection save the CGI aliens/swimming and the hybrid thing.
>>79095801
Jurassic World
>>79096183
Shit taste
>>79095801
Not what you posted.
>>79096183
Alien=Aliens > Predator 2 > Prometheus > Alien 3 > Alien Resurrection
>>79096183
>Aliens == Alien 3
bait
>>79096522
>Predator 2 >
T O P L E L
O
P
L
E
L
>>79096183
Alien > Alien: Resurrection > Aliens > Prometheus > Alien 3
Police academy 4
American pie 4
Superman 4
>>79096550
It's the same universe. Altough same thing could be said about the AvP movies but they were retconned. Predators is also in the same universe.
>>79096258
Goblet of Fire was the first stinker in the series, followed by Order of the Phoenix.
>>79095801
Fast and Furious.all are basically shit, so not a great example, butUnderworld. James Bond.
>>79096126
only good answer
>>79096702
You're mom's ass is so big it's not in the same universe
kek
>>79095801
FURY ROAD YOU PLEB
>>79096833
how nu r u
>>79096622
Alien > Aliens > Prometheus > Alien 3 > AvP part 1-45 > Alien Resurrection
All fixed up for you, Anon.
>>79097261
>forgetting Predator 2 and Predators
wew lad
Promethues > Predators > Alien Resurrection > Aliens > Predator > Aliens > AVP > Predator 2 > AVP2 > Alien3
>>79097816
Why include Predator though? There are no Alien references in that one.
>>79097871
There isn't but I kind of just group them into the same series of films even if they strictly aren't.
>>79095801
Rocky 4
Rambo 4
Star Trek 4
Police Story 4
>>79098719
Also mission impossible 4
>>79098719
>Rocky 4
Haha, no.
>Rambo 4
Crystal Skull-tier
>Star Trek 4
more like Reddit Trek
>Police Story 4
how many were there?
>>79098748
nah, it's boring af
>>79098845
Garbage taste, kys twice
>>79098748
MI 4 > 3 > 1 = 5 > 2
Alien Res is a terrible movie and Whedon is a terrible writer and person.
>>79098905
>kys twice
>>79098905
impressive counter-argument, really made me think