>watch a movie >turns out to be a flick what are some times

>>79041592
>shitting on one of Spielberg's greatest
get some taste

>>79041735
spielberg is a hack. his only good film was jurassic park.
>muh sentimental children's films for adults
why jaws sucks
>boring characters
>cheesy music
>practical effects have not aged well
>very little sharks

>>79041842
Spielber doesn't only make sentimental movies for children retard. Also
>boring characters
the characters aren't important, it's the shark
>cheesy music
it's supposed to be cheesy. Also one of the most iconic in the industry
>practical effects have not aged well
It's supposed to be cheesy
>very little sharks
you obviously don't know about what happened behind the scenes
3/10 bait thread

>>79041922>>79041922
>the characters aren't important, it's the shark
jesus christ. the shark that shows up for ten seconds?
>you obviously don't know about what happened behind the scenes
you mean behind the scenes of the actual film? how would that matter?

>>79042088
the shark was mechanical and the crew had trouble manipulating it around, it broke down several during production, hence why it "shows up for 10 seconds".

What would you prefer? The movie having a CGI bullshit shark like the sequels?

>>79041592
is she naked in the poster art??!?

>>79042248
who?

>>79041592
It's actually kino

>>79041842
>borning characters
confirmed bait

>>79041592
it's regarded as a top 100 film of all time. that's pretty good.

>>79042283
>it's regarded as a top 100 film of all time

Only by plebs.

>>79042283
>>79042240
by who? IMDB? fucking kek. the film sucks, get over it
>le youre gonna need le bigger boat XDDD

>>79042342
>>79042330
http://www.theyshootpictures.com/gf1000_all1000films.htm

you don't have to agree

>>79042277
The shark.

>>79042277
The shark

>>79042330
The American Film Institute lists it in its 100 movies list
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AFI%27s_100_Years...100_Movies

>>79042468
your point? they also have "muh holocaust" at # 19

>>79042488
the criteria for movies to make it into the list are being culturally and historically significant, being an award winner, being critically and commercially well received,etc... it wouldn't be on the list if Spielberg was a hack as you said. Also,
>muh holocaust
I personally hate the jews but Schindler's list was great, at least from a technical standpoint

>>79042573
>the criteria for movies to make it into the list are being culturally and historically significant, being an award winner, being critically and commercially well received,etc... it wouldn't be on the list if Spielberg was a hack as you said
commercially well received is the only time spielberg is well received. gilliam and kubrick hated him.

File: 1484699535619.png (984KB, 648x1880px) Image search: [Google]

984KB, 648x1880px

It is a movie though.

>>79042633
Your point? Not everyone is going to like everything. The Bible is the best selling book of all time and it has plenty of haters. The point I'm trying to make is Jaws deserves a place in their list and that Spielberg being a hack is wrong

>>79042330
Capeshit kid confirmed.

File: 15 minutes poster.jpg (33KB, 295x438px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 295x438px

Watching this master-piece