[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y ] [Search | Free Show | Home]

Original "Ocean's" series > soft reboot of

This is a blue board which means that it's for everybody (Safe For Work content only). If you see any adult content, please report it.

Thread replies: 36
Thread images: 4

Original "Ocean's" series

> soft reboot of classic film directed by Steven Soderbergh, one of the most acclaimed directors of the 1990's independent film revolution
> series is a pastiche of classic Rat Pack-era films, packed with self-referential humor
> cast packed with A-listers, all of whom are close friends in real life, adding levity to the already playful, script

New Female "Ocean's" series

> "spin-off" of reboot, despite having no connection to the original other than the fact that heists take place
> directed by the guy who did bland commercial films like the Hunger Games and Sea Biscuit, with no unique style or charm
> likely a parody of sexism in Rat Pack movies, humor directed outward in order to make protagonists seem tougher and smarter
> cast a mix of A-listers and literally whos who despise each other in real life and don't speak to each other off-set, which means no improvisation and constant overacting in order to steal scenes

Calling it now. Why do you think the studios making these female reboots constantly misunderstand what made the source material appealing?
>>
what's the difference between a soft reboot and a remake.
>>
File: 1465453678483.gif (767KB, 298x298px) Image search: [Google]
1465453678483.gif
767KB, 298x298px
>women like hot guys like Pitt and Clooney, so they go see the movie
>guys like badass dudes doing heists, so they go see the movie
>hollywood decides to replace the hot guys with an all female cast
>no one sees it

why is it so hard for (((them))) to understand?
>>
>>78940593

>what's the difference between a soft reboot and a remake.

I think the big distinction is consistency of plot/characters. Although both Ocean's 11s feature a "Danny Ocean" and elaborate heists, they don't really share any similarities in characters/plot. This makes sense, because the two films are separated by like 50 years.
>>
>>78940644
What you state is logic.
Something that is lacking in Hollywood.
>>
> it's a sexism on teevee thread

Sage goes in all fields
>>
>>78940644
it's hard to make the feminist narrative profitable, but they're working hard to find the balance
>>
>>78940538
Is that Cate Blanchett? She done fucked up wew lad

JUST
>>
File: awkwafina.png (1MB, 868x479px) Image search: [Google]
awkwafina.png
1MB, 868x479px
MY VAG

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z726OPwCnjE
>>
>>78940781
At least the racist ones will be happy that the minorities are seated at the back
>>
>>78940538
>Le tricky talk shit about a movie but spam the same picture and talking points shill thread face
>>
>>78940644
>hot men are a male power fantasy and eye candy for women
>hot women are sex objects and nothing else
You sound like a feminist.
>>
>>78940781
what does sage mean
>>
>>78941027
jewtube newfag detected
>>
>>78941077
what does it mean tho
>>
>>78941098
opposite of bump
>>
>>78941104
what kind of faget would do that?

esp since I bumped it 3 times now just to find out what the fuck that meant
>>
>>78941126
that's the meme
>>
>>78941027

If you type it into options, you can post (pushing the post further to the 250 text post limit) without bumping the thread. It's used to kill off-topic or objectionable threads. Typing "Sage" into all available fields would actually cause the post to bump, so it's possible that the poster was simply bumping the thread by ironically encouraging people, who might dislike the subject matter, to do the same.

There are a lot of layers to this post, if you ask me.
>>
>>78940892

Is this a parody of a parody? I'm not sure I understand.
>>
>>78940644
The beatings will continue until morale improves.
>>
>>78940644
>studio wants to reboot a movie
>only gimmick they can come up with is 'wimminz'
>no one sees it
>>
>>78940892
why do feminists want to be niggas so bad
always with the rap aesthetics with cash guns and swearings

like bitch you're the most sheltered people on earth no one thinks you're hard
>>
>>78940644
By your same logic guys will see it to see attractive women and women will see it to because they relate better to women. But that is an untrue simplification which isn't logical, same as why what you said about the male reboot is an unture simplification.
>>
You guys know that these films are basically tax fraud, right?

> studio owns contract businesses involved in production
> these businesses overbill for pretty much everything
> collect back most of the money they spend
> movie tanks because no one wants to see all-female reboots
> loses millions of $
> studio collects insurance money from Chinese or Qatarian firm that doesn't know anything about film business
> can write off "devestating losses" on tax filings
> still have all the money from the businesses you own
> cycle repeats
>>
>>78941399
jews like throwing their money away and I like laughing at them
it's a win win
>>
>>78941504

his logic doesn't assume that men and women are the same, in fact, he's implying that they are different therefore switching genders won't work.
>>
>>78940593
A soft reboot is a remake pretending to be a sequel
>>
>>78940781
can't wait to take your vote away slut
>>
>>78940538
>it'll be bad because it has a female cast!

sure thing incel
>>
>>78940538
Sandra's looking alright for her age tbqhwyl. Also, Cate in those leather pants <3 <3

I would say reserve your judgement (what do we honestly know about this beyond the cast and that it has the same director as Hunger Games and Free State of Jones?) until the first full-length trailer drops, but you'll probably hate that anyway regardless of what they show, so whatever. lolwomen amirite?
>>
>>78940973
Fuck off to reddit.
>>
Also this idea that the Soderbergh films were anything to write home about can go fuck itself.
>>
>>78941334
>implying sage still works.

Retard.
>>
>>78943599
Idiot
>>
File: 1460381244830.jpg (1MB, 2078x3000px) Image search: [Google]
1460381244830.jpg
1MB, 2078x3000px
>>78940644
>men go to see eye candy qts
>women go to see badass females doing stuff no one else can even dream about
Thread posts: 36
Thread images: 4


[Boards: 3 / a / aco / adv / an / asp / b / bant / biz / c / can / cgl / ck / cm / co / cock / d / diy / e / fa / fap / fit / fitlit / g / gd / gif / h / hc / his / hm / hr / i / ic / int / jp / k / lgbt / lit / m / mlp / mlpol / mo / mtv / mu / n / news / o / out / outsoc / p / po / pol / qa / qst / r / r9k / s / s4s / sci / soc / sp / spa / t / tg / toy / trash / trv / tv / u / v / vg / vint / vip / vp / vr / w / wg / wsg / wsr / x / y] [Search | Top | Home]

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/


If you need a post removed click on it's [Report] button and follow the instruction.
DMCA Content Takedown via dmca.com
All images are hosted on imgur.com.
If you like this website please support us by donating with Bitcoins at 16mKtbZiwW52BLkibtCr8jUg2KVUMTxVQ5
All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective parties.
Images uploaded are the responsibility of the Poster. Comments are owned by the Poster.
This is a 4chan archive - all of the content originated from that site.
This means that RandomArchive shows their content, archived.
If you need information for a Poster - contact them.