Literally why is La La Land one of the """best""""

>>78911753
Because IMDB sucks Hollywood cock when it comes to ratings

>>78911782
As does RT

>>78911753
>look at the imdb top 250
>taking it seriously

wew, lad

33. Interplebber
34. Casablanca
35. Psycho

fucking hell. ban all scifi when?

>>78911753
>muh musical

>>78911835
Interstellar is good, pleb.

>>78911782
Do you know how IMDB works?

>>78911980
imdb lists = people of imdb who vote = people on imdb almost exclusively watch hollywood movies = imdb sucks hollywood cock

>>78911880
>likes Interstellar
>calls other people plebs

>>78912554
Let's hear your "non-meme" reasons as to why Interstellar was bad. Other than "4chan told me it was!"

Pro-tip: /tv/ fucking loved Interstellar when it first came out. Then the "contrarian factor" was applied and now everyone hates it.

>>78911831
I felt like maybe in the early 00's it truly did mean something. The only questionable one was Shawshank at the time. It only got bad post-The Dark Knight. Now I look at it and almost cry sometimes with every good movie of every year getting into the top 100 and classics being pushed out, eventually its just going to be 25 years of dreck + Casablanca.

I wish something would be done because it feels way too easy to make a 9/10 movie these days. I remember as a kid marveling at something I really liked from Disney only getting a 6.6 and the GOAT movies only getting a 8.2, now shit like American History X is getting 8.5.

Top 250 basically works out to be "most watched movies" or "muh classics" rather than any indicator of quality

>>78911753
It isn't its fucking trash

>>78912699
IMDb fell when it required javascript to browse.