Every negative criticism I see about this film is that it's

>>78904089
But that is literally what happened with those films

http://www.theweek.co.uk/amp/entertainment/5191/apocalypse-now-original-1979-reviews

Unless this was the point of your post, sorry

>>78904171
Didn't know this. I guess this settles it, critics have always been plebs.

>>78904215
Critics are just pretentious faggots who think their opinion matters

I saw Silence earlier today and i didn't like it as much i was expecting

but it's a good film

>>78904089
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pCKwtUXyU1k
it's not boring per se, just repetitive and one note. VERY repetitive and one note.
As is usually the case, you're better off reading the book

silence is pretty boring if you know just about any history.

a movie about 16th century catholics walking around wondering why people are being tortured for their religious beliefs is absolutely absurd.

It's just a formality, /tv/.

File: silence-martin-scorsese-andrew-garfield-adam-driver-liam-neeson-1-22-at-10-34-40-pm[1].jpg (56KB, 739x369px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 739x369px

Did anyone else get spooked?

>Martin Scorsese presents Saw
>anything better than okay

Remove your head from your ass.

Why is /tv/ so terrible?
Silence was a perfect film.

>>78906169

>instead of looking at the actual face of jesus, he sees a portrait of jesus in his face

kek

>>78906169
Damn, is that in it?

I haven't got to see it yet but as a Catholic it's kickass to see genuinely powerful imagery like that in film. kudos Scorsese