>we have the technology to put EVERYTHING we have EVER imagined on a movie
>every movie is made the same generic explosions and super heroes from 50 years ago
>we can easily film anywhere on or off the planet in high definition
>films are still set in L.A. or use rolling oak hills of Central California as backdrop
Well then stop going to see Hollywood blockbuster #91238 in cinema?
>>78854973
>we can spend 250 million dollars on something nobody has ever heard of, plus another 200 million in marketing because we really really need them to see this expensive shit
or
>we can spend 250 million on something widely recognized with a built in fan base that is guaranteed to make money and will market itself and also we'll get tie-in money from companies who want to associate with a guaranteed hit
What would you do, OP? Oh, that's right, nobody will ever ask you what to do with 250 million dollars. Nobody will ever ask you what to do with 25 dollars. Fuck off.
>>78855252
fuck off nigger no fucking excuses aliens was made in a 18 million budget, ok it was a sequel but still
>>78854973
>>we have the technology to put EVERYTHING we have EVER imagined on a movie
>dont pay vfx studios and they go out of business after 2 movies.
jews gonna jew what ya gonna do
>>78855145
>live in Carlsbad
>film crews all over Oceanside for some pleb TNT show
>police everywhere to protect the richies
>meth dealers all moved down the coast for the time being
>got asked twice today if I wanted 'crys'
Fuck off Hollywood shits
>>78855252
How about:
>we can spend 250 million dollars on 50 to 100 small-budget movies like 'The Witch" and "Moonlight" and achieve a 1000%+ return on investment.
>>78854973
Time is-
>>78855431
It doesn't work like that. There's only so much money that people will spend on films in a given year
For every Witch, there's a Neon Demon that fails to hit big at the box office
You just largely only hear of the ones that attain a cult following and thus make a profit
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KZazEM8cgt0
>>78855579
stupid animeposter
>>78855532
I understand your point, but by investing in smaller projects you limit your downside risk dramatically. For example, The Neon Demon had a budget of $7 million and earned $3.4 million in box office. The Witch had a budget of $3 million and earned $40.4 million in box office. So, between them, $10 million invested generated $43.8 million in box office revenue. Some big-budget projects achieve or exceed that ratio, but many others flop.
>>78855760
fuck off nigga