Hey /trv/ I am going to south America shortly and can have a stop off for a couple of days in either:
Los Angeles
Houston
San Francisco
Which would you recommend and why?
Thanks
What do you like to do, what interests you.
I would not recommend Houston, unless you want to go to the NASA stuff there, whihc is worth seeing if you are a space buff. And there are some good places to eat there. Nut otherwise it struck me as a pretty soulless city.
Pic slightly related, it;s the Saturn 5 that is in Florida, but there is one in Houston as well.
>>1174324
San Francisco is nice, but you have to drive so fucking much to even enjoy anything
https://en.wikivoyage.org/wiki/Avoiding_travel_through_the_United_States
All of those cities are spread out and require driving to get anywhere.
I live in Houston, and it is not a bad city and you could fill up a few days here.
I have been to L.A. a few times, and you know the basic stuff in that area. Disney, Hollywood, Venice Beach, etc...
I would probably go to San Fran if it were me. I think it is the prettiest of the three. Some must see landmarks, and also good food choices.
SF can be cold at anytime of the year, Mark Twain said the coldest winter he ever had was a summer in San Fran. The other two will have warm weather if that matters to you.
If you pick Houston, I will try and help more.
San Francisco. It's a walk around place and the others aren't. Train goes from airport to downtown. Get a hotel by union square and you will be close to lots of stuff.
>>1174324
San Francisco, I've lived in all 3, Houston and LA are shit.
>>1174360
driving, in SF? You're a moron.
>>1174324
San Francisco