A thread made for folks who can't get off to circlepeople,

File: aruurara1.png (2MB, 900x1273px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 900x1273px

Think the term you're looking for is THICC.

File: 35b70d0f32cda59305fe2ccd67ef405b.jpg (456KB, 1280x1591px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 1280x1591px

>>3663061
THICC is why to broad a term
But conditioning there is already a BBW thread up in guess it would have been fine but i would still would prefer not to take chances

File: 1466140512912.png (19KB, 224x262px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 224x262px

>this thread

File: 1456716772788.jpg (102KB, 1280x773px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 1280x773px

So basically a thread for thicc but not too fat?

well okay then

>>3663039
>Futa is ok
>NO GAY SHIT

Make up your mind OP.

>>3663389
>thicc but not too fat?

>well okay then

Then why did you post some morbidly obese bunny?

I think you think thicc means something it's now.

File: 1450982907431.jpg (25KB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 250x250px

>>3663688
>he thinks >>3663389 is "morbidly obese"

Here's your (You)

File: 1464672420289.jpg (169KB, 1280x904px) Image search: [Google]

169KB, 1280x904px

Have some thicc pupper

>No gay shit
>Futa allowed
Nigga u gay

This thread is making my dreams come true.

>nothing but fatshit
Dunno why I didn't expect this.

File: 1465133458859.jpg (727KB, 1131x1600px) Image search: [Google]

727KB, 1131x1600px

>>3666387
I got at least 4 'not too fat' images from this thread, and the OP pic was representative of the upper limit of what I wanted, for once. I'm fine.
Were you looking for 'soft'?

Because there's:
>normal
>full-figured
>soft
>plush
>thick
>chubby
>fat
>thicc
>obese
>"chubby"
>morbidly obese
>>>/d/
>"""chubby"""
>has own gravitational pull
>has own gravytational pull
If I had time, I'd make a chart or something. Lord knows, we need one around here.

File: image.jpg (162KB, 1023x1245px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 1023x1245px

>>3666631
This is what autism looks like folks.

>>3667025
I'm actually fine with anything before >>>/d/, but I know some people will complain no matter what, so we need clear definitions.

>>3666631
You forgot healthy. Though it all just means fat now since the terms have been corrupted.

File: 1465133781842.png (413KB, 897x1000px) Image search: [Google]

413KB, 897x1000px

>>3667141
We need continual updates to the list, and a cynical drawfag who knows the thicc-ness struggle, and isn't afraid to get /trash/y. Someone make a Docs page.

Am I the only one who is fucking sick and tired of the thicc meme? Not the bodytypes themselves, but the use of the word and its growing meaninglessness.

File: image.png (592KB, 1280x1415px) Image search: [Google]

592KB, 1280x1415px

>>3667094
If they're going to complain no matter what why even bother with clarifying definitions? You'll just get people who will argue whether or not something is x or y because it "looks more like x" or "is too chunky for y."

People are stupid. We don't need to put labels on our animal drawings. 5 delegations at most is what I say.

File: image.jpg (412KB, 1133x1280px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 1133x1280px

>>3667363
Here's the rest of the set for those interested.

File: image.png (495KB, 1280x1201px) Image search: [Google]

495KB, 1280x1201px

>>3667455

File: image.png (497KB, 1280x1095px) Image search: [Google]

497KB, 1280x1095px

>>3667469

File: image.png (775KB, 1410x1375px) Image search: [Google]

775KB, 1410x1375px

>>3667486
...and some bonus Kibbles.

File: image.jpg (120KB, 711x1280px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 711x1280px

>>3667512

>>3667359
It was a shit term since its inceptions, but I'm more tired of the "high test" meme.

File: image.png (469KB, 825x1002px) Image search: [Google]

469KB, 825x1002px

>>3667524

File: image.jpg (462KB, 700x988px) Image search: [Google]

462KB, 700x988px

>>3667543
Captcha: Select all images with food.

File: image.png (432KB, 1280x947px) Image search: [Google]

432KB, 1280x947px

>>3667571

File: image.png (116KB, 456x924px) Image search: [Google]

116KB, 456x924px

>>3667598
RIP Uberquest threads.

File: image.jpg (46KB, 466x349px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 466x349px

>The size I like is too big for the thicc thread and too small amongst the hyper immobiles and nasty cross fetish shit in the fat threads

File: image.png (481KB, 1000x1250px) Image search: [Google]

481KB, 1000x1250px

>>3667691
You like this? Bigger? Smaller?

File: 12354279249.jpg (167KB, 1280x978px) Image search: [Google]

167KB, 1280x978px

>>3667691
>tfwyktfw
suffering

File: 1449782647673.jpg (301KB, 950x1321px) Image search: [Google]

301KB, 950x1321px

Ah yes, the thread for me.

The problem is that everyone has their own definitions of chubby, fat, thicc, plump, etc, and there are no RIGHT DEFINITIONS of those words.

File: 1449058786975.jpg (284KB, 732x832px) Image search: [Google]

284KB, 732x832px

>>3668625
Lets just say the sweet spot is dead center between anorexic and blob.

>>3668625
This is why it's easier to call everything fat when you draw it. Fatfags won't complain about the size of the character if it's below what they prefer. Trying to appeal to anything else just gets complaints and arguments.

File: 3fc5922e7daf0705266f100b08ec9e56.png (1MB, 1164x1270px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1164x1270px

>>3669073
OP Here
Really im not picky as long as they aren't fucking katamari damacy its fine with me so everything in the thread is great

But if it bothers everyone so much maybe instead of labeling the overall size of the woman we can find other thing to descriptions and break it into smaller parts

Example:"I am looking for art of woman with up to J cup breasts, Large hips that are at least somewhat anatomically feasible, and some stomach fat"

Its a bit long winded but no one should get that confused
...i dont think

>>3669915
>But if it bothers everyone so much maybe instead of labeling the overall size of the woman we can find other thing to descriptions and break it into smaller parts
You can do that. I was just getting out personal beef because I draw this kind of stuff and want to make it as simple as possible. Your solutions sounds like too much work for me, but whatever. The way I tag things has been working out so far.

>>3668678
What you posted is my ideal body type, but I wouldn't classify that as dead centre. That's what I'd actually consider full-figured (barely any excess fat, but no visible bones and little muscle definition), and barely qualifies for soft, let alone chubby.

>>3667691
>WAH PEOPLE DON'T CATER TO ME

fuck off

File: 1453055388861.png (22KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 236x236px

>>3666387
>wahh wahh people aren't posting the exact body size that I enjoy the most

>>3672834
But the purpose of the thread is to not post landwhales. People are posting landwhales.

File: 8f173d72822e53d0908146fa9a2e9d33.jpg (113KB, 847x1200px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 847x1200px

>>3672888
I see no images in this thread that fall under the "landwhale" category.

But then again, when >>3668678 is your definition of "thicc", I suppose anything with a tiny bit of fat will look like "landwhale" to you.

>>3672938
>I see no images in this thread that fall under the "landwhale" category.
>>3668440
>>3668406
>>3668392
>>3667922
>>3667825
>>3664589
>>3663389
>>3663080
>>3663042
>>3668424
You must be an american if you don't consider these landwhales.

>>3672938
Not him, but
>>3668491
>>3668440
>>3668406
>>3668392
>>3668374
>>3667922
>>3667854
>>3667825
>>3664551
>>3664535
>>3663389
clearly don't fit the thread's intended purpose. That isn't to say they're bad. They're just not for this thread.

File: 1464583818491.png (233KB, 800x1000px) Image search: [Google]

233KB, 800x1000px

I like to think OP had something like this in mind. visible belly fold, but no fat rolls.

File: 773367a7c52d0dff409873f4018f9cc8.jpg (211KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1280x1280px

>>3673199
>>3673156
Op here
Like i said >>3669915 this is supposed to be a general thread for all "THICC" girls so most everything posted here is fine.
If you think the girls being posted are to fatty post something slimmer.
As long as we dont have /d/ tier Circlepeople in the thread its fine, we have like 4 threads like that on trash right now so if you wanna know what not to post look there.
Everything eles is fair game.

>>3673454
The fat threads have a lot of posts with in between fats too.

>>3673084
>>3673156
>a little belly, and it's not the primary focus
>"landwhale"
Are you African?

File: 30e54d42b0c92c8f8c70131f0874d11c.png (235KB, 670x915px) Image search: [Google]

235KB, 670x915px

>>3673611
Yeah but you all have eyes
You know whats fucking morbid obesity and whats not. And if you really cant tell then post what you think true THICC is.

>>3667825
This right here is the maximum
Nothing bigger than this

This is basically just another fat thread adding to the already too many we have now. You could have just posted these there and saved the board from the millionth variation of fat threads.

>>3673653
I didn't say landwhale. I was just worried we might be straying dangerously close to "circlepeople". If OP says it's fine so far, then it's fine so far.
>>3673810
gb2 /diaperdrawthread/. The goal here is clear.

File: 1465136926139.jpg (290KB, 800x921px) Image search: [Google]

290KB, 800x921px

>>3673873
forgot to put hgg in there several times.

File: 1447703705167.png (14KB, 399x391px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 399x391px

>>3673873
>gb2 /diaperdrawthread/. The goal here is clear.
What the fuck are you talking about?

File: 1465134540930.jpg (188KB, 1280x923px) Image search: [Google]

188KB, 1280x923px

>>3673919
If you don't like this thread, there's 149 other fountains of degeneracy that may strike your fancy. Like the diaper threads, or the drawthreads, or the 18 HG threads. You've no reason to be here if you don't like this stuff.

File: 1465436455435.png (2MB, 1500x843px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1500x843px

>tfw out of fur that isn't skinny bitches

>>3666631
>on E621
>notice a lot of images have been altered in tags to 'slightly chubby'
>varies from anywhere on the spectrum

some fatties got triggered over there, clearly.

File: 1453451698.darklord92_cockadoodle.png (1MB, 1092x1405px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1092x1405px

>thicc thread
>people arguing over what counts as "thicc" and what doesn't
>people arguing that X image is not "thicc" because it's too fat
>people arguing over a subjective term with no real definition

every thread

File: 40f09b276f2c30386f12de26ae878608.jpg (126KB, 1280x1138px) Image search: [Google]

126KB, 1280x1138px

>>3674503
Thats what im trying to say
Why cant people just stop bitching and post what they like

>>3674503
Shut up, we're working on it. >>3666631

File: 56d53f5c929e2464fc2374f51bee3246.jpg (1MB, 1039x1629px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1039x1629px

Not sure if this is giantess or just a wierd perspective but it pretty THICC so her you go

>>3674692
Thick Zangoose is my favorite thing.

>>3667691
So make a thread for fatties and not hyper obese.

File: lol.jpg (61KB, 1080x829px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 1080x829px

>This thread

File: 1464585942915.jpg (490KB, 850x929px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 850x929px

>>3675221
Yes.

File: 2ebb64e1ffa6a63e1a768161d98b9a41.jpg (27KB, 376x617px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 376x617px

>>3675224
We don't need any more of these types of threads.

File: 1464775104755.png (1MB, 2000x1328px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1328px

>>3675321
All we need is the barely fat tread, the normal fat thread, and the fat++ thread. This thread covers barely fat to normal fat.

>>3675361
But there are already 4 different types up now, not including this one.

File: ea4e4c111cf16b852314e47b225e018c.png (3MB, 2709x2278px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 2709x2278px

>>3675422
No all of those are Fat++

File: 1464585822851.jpg (647KB, 655x1000px) Image search: [Google]

647KB, 655x1000px

>>3675453
You have to fap to each previous level of THICC, in ascending order, to unlock Fat++.
>>3675520
Is there a name for the female version of the bara aesthetic? I like it.

File: afaf362574806f78d9c81dff544a1463.jpg (215KB, 1182x1280px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 1182x1280px

>>3675583
I dont know but i personally like my girls soft and pliable

File: 108bde4433065f4dd147d2c6b16b8da4.jpg (293KB, 714x1000px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 714x1000px

>>3663039
>but still crave women with meat on their bones
Disgusting.

File: 40313_46468.jpg (19KB, 512x384px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 512x384px

>>3675692
Thats a good one anon
Well done

>>3675647
But that's kinda the appeal of the Toriel in that pic. The torso and hips look plush enough, and have a nice synergy with her broad shoulder and arm muscles. I bet she'd be a superb big spoon.

File: 9eed2f5e4c25773494506616334d3565.jpg (102KB, 937x1200px) Image search: [Google]

102KB, 937x1200px

>>3675937
You raise some interesting points my friend
Ill be on the look out for more like it.

>>3667543
time skip NOW!

File: 1455024733575.jpg (264KB, 1200x1659px) Image search: [Google]

264KB, 1200x1659px

>>3663039

>>3676544
>3dpd
No wonder all three look like absolute shit.

>>3676147
Canadafag here. Milk bags are fucking radical. Cartons? Jugs? 'Fuck outta here with that inefficient, unwieldy garbage.

>>3678202
>jugs
>unwieldy
The fuck you talking about, son? Two in each hand.

File: 1458519677236.jpg (467KB, 818x904px) Image search: [Google]

467KB, 818x904px

>>3663389

File: 1464588059728.jpg (302KB, 1142x1600px) Image search: [Google]

302KB, 1142x1600px

Milkbags4lyf

>>3678549
pretty sure this is beyond chubby

File: 1462843865197.png (510KB, 931x1149px) Image search: [Google]

510KB, 931x1149px

>>3681530
It's better then the fat nasty Jabba the Hutt
looking slob pics I've seen in some of the threads

File: 1450422956095.png (2MB, 960x1920px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 960x1920px

let me join this thread

>>3683127
Saved. Cow-girls are underrated.

>>3663045
In what fucked up plane of existence logically look like that?
>doesn't hold down the entire top side of the paper, leaving it free to flutter about in the breeze

Stay thicc, everyone.

File: plump isabelle.png (737KB, 773x1000px) Image search: [Google]

737KB, 773x1000px

no dying

>>3686344
I hate multiboob, but otherwise nice. Mary probably would do that if drank so much.

>>3693291
I'm not a fan of multiboobs either, but it's canon that all cat and canine characters have multiboobs.

Anyone else like fat furries but not humans? Just curious.

>>3693379
Which left me disappointed, I was hoping Rufus was potbellied cause musclegut is hot

Lot of fatshit in this thread

>>3695262
this is the worst form of shitposting I've seen

> page 10

>>3674373
though conversely people have been using the "overweight" tag for the ones that are larger than chubby a lot more than they used to

also did you ever notice that there is a hidden tag for "fat"? It's not listed on the side of the image with the other tags but you can search for it.

File: image.png (530KB, 1000x1465px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 1000x1465px

>all this whining
Post thick or don't post. That simple.

So, a fat thread?
Cause that's all I'm seeing from these images.

>>3663039
>meat on bones
Fat is not muscle.

File: 405508fe36960ae4e083fba308a4971d.png (151KB, 560x616px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 560x616px

>>3702742
>hidden tag for "fat"
It's not a hidden tag. It's aliased to 'overweight'. Either searching for 'fat' or 'overweight' will yield the same exact results. See here:
https://e621.net/wiki/show/overweight
Also of interest, they have a "Scale of fatness" as a guide to tag stuff. Of course, it's up to people to actually follow it...

The stuff tagged as 'slightly_chubby' would be the one of interest for this thread.

>>3663039
source?

File: 1437636322859.jpg (140KB, 1280x1280px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 1280x1280px

Chubby cuntboy

File: get out.gif (732KB, 635x507px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 635x507px

>>3707934
>women
>NO GAY SHIT

>>3726130
>>3721504>>3721461
>>3721232>>3716414
>>3707934>>3707635
>>3707037>>3705615
>>3705198>>3702769
>>3702656>>3696401
>>3692904>>3684135
>>3683905>>3683127
>>3683111>>3683099
>>3683092>>3683084
>>3683078>>3683063
>>3683052>>3683030
>>3683024>>3683019
>>3683015>>3683008
>>3681857>>3679273
>>3678549>>3676171
>>3676147>>3676091
>>3676018>>3675868
>>3675823>>3675692
>>3675666>>3675647
>>3675618>>3675583
>>3675520>>3675453
>>3675361>>3675321
>>3675288>>3675278
>>3675253>>3675221
>>3675208>>3674963
>>3674791>>3674692
>>3674580>>3674170
>>3674149>>3674101
>>3674068>>3674011
>>3673992>>3673889
>>3673742>>3673598
>>3673454>>3673199
>>3672938>>3671923
>>3669915>>3668678
>>3668552>>3668491
>>3668466>>3668440
>>3668424>>3668406
>>3668392>>3668374
>>3668334>>3668311
>>3668300>>3668279
>>3668269>>3667922
>>3667868>>3667854
>>3667825>>3667691
>>3667607>>3667524
>>3667512>>3667486
>>3667469>>3667455
>>3667363>>3667184
>>3667025>>3666631
>>3664819>>3664807
>>3664589>>3664551
>>3664535>>3664390
>>3664077>>3663923
>>3663389>>3663209
>>3663118>>3663107
>>3663101>>3663088
>>3663080>>3663072
>>3663061>>3663054
>>3663049>>3663045
>>3663042>>3663039
SHE THICC UUUUUUUUUHHHHHGHH
SHE SO THICC

>>3726596
>>3675692
>literal skellington
>thicc
What.

File: image.jpg (148KB, 649x896px) Image search: [Google]

148KB, 649x896px

>>3732158
More from this artist pleaaaaase

>>3732337
https://e621.net/post/index/1/aedollon

>>3666631
None of these terms have a set definition.

>>3663039
wtf is circle people

File: ccd82510772b1ee4b274caaa0c69ba6d.png (427KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

427KB, 1200x900px

>>3733510
Slob porn

File: 1369084900.herro_milftails.jpg (846KB, 905x905px) Image search: [Google]

846KB, 905x905px

>>3683015
Dripdry!