Thread replies: 6
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3
File: s-l1600.jpg (96KB, 810x1126px) Image search:
[Google]
96KB, 810x1126px
Why do so many action figures have these long, stretched giraffe necks placing the head so far above the shoulders? It doesn't just look weird, it's anatomically inaccurate. I see this with so many toys now, and it's an old trend- go look at some early 90s GI Joes, when Hasbro somehow managed to move the shoulders so low they'd be attached at the base of a person's sternum.
>>
File: still mad about phat company.jpg (109KB, 860x573px) Image search:
[Google]
109KB, 860x573px
>>6372119
back in black to giraffe yourself off
>>
>>6372119
Gee, it's like anatomically incorrect toys are easier to articulate or something
>>
>>6372257
making the neck overly long doesn't "enhance" articulation in any way, shape or form.
Though since corporate fanboys go out of their way to defend toys that break, I'm not surprised you'd defend anything they shit out.
>>
>>6372342
Weird, it's like I said nothing of any brand whatsoever.
But then again, the benefits of a longer neck escapes you. Probably no point in continuing any further anyways
>>
File: 1481346024449.jpg (75KB, 497x576px) Image search:
[Google]
75KB, 497x576px
>>6372342
>Though since corporate fanboys go out of their way to defend toys that break, I'm not surprised you'd defend anything they shit out
Thread posts: 6
Thread images: 3
Thread images: 3