http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/ 10.1002/ajpa.23308/full

>>55323437
>b-but female adventurers are unrealistic!11one
Said nobody ever. Kys asap.

>>55323437
got literally banned from a 'science' group by arguing that not everyone in a grave with warrior stuff in it must've been a warrior, no matter sex of the corpse :(
If i get buried with a Harley and a Hells Angels jacket, does that make me a member of those heroin dealing fags? Woman as wariors existed, but is this proof that specific girl was one? Nope, sadly not.

I thought vikings burned their dead on rafts.

>>55323437
>b-but female adventurers are unrealistic!11one

No one ever said that, also Julie d'Aubigny existed. Seriously try telling me that she wasn't a fucking player character.

>>55323484
>-4 strength

>>55323437
Exceptions rather than the norm. But in a game of pretend, who cares. If the DM wants to make the party a sausagefest for his particular game of make believe, then don't play with him.

>>55325797
Irrelevant, strength has nothing to do with adventuring

>>55326098
>says the keyboard warrior

This thread is going to be a beautiful trainwreck.

>>55326544
>>says the keyboard warrior

>>55323962
>If i get buried with a Harley and a Hells Angels jacket, does that make me a member of those heroin dealing fags?
No, but it'd be pretty damn likely. Why else would you get buried with a Harley and a Hells Angels jacket? I mean, if someone else bothered to bury you this way, the only explanation is that you were super into it.

>>55323437
They're not unrealistic and I doubt anyone would ever argue for that, it's just that with the culture of the time it'd be incredibly dangerous for a female to be an adventurer and that's ignoring the fact that they already have a huge biological disadvantage at it.

Then again, I doubt many people are playing their games on Earth to have these arguments hold. We can't assume fantastical worlds would have gone through the exact same cultures we went through.

>>55326584
I know you are but what am I!