Now that Dinos are a thing and many of the Lizard-type dinosaurs have been errata'd to become Dino-type, can we expect WoTC to finally introduce Girl-type and errata many of the Human-type girls to become Girl-type?
>>55269708
>>55269708
Unfortunately, no. WoTC is full of SJWs, so they'll keep shoving the "girls are people" meme down everyone's throat.
>>55269708
God, hopefully. I'm sick of these corporate sellouts trying to push the lie that girls are humans down out throats.
The problem is we can't be sure what any of these types identify as; it's a slippery slope.
>>55269708
I hope so. Girls are NOT people.
But how will we know if they're girl-male or girl-female? I think this system is still too traditionally gendered.
>>55279101
The same way you know if humans are human-male or human-female
>itt: niggas don't even know that girls are actually dinosaurs
>>55282037
No, girls are species of primate.
>>55269708
>>55283167
So its type would become "Girl Child" with the errata
>>55276140
This. Creature subtypes should not be set by the card, but by the player who made the deck since they would know how the deck identifies itself.