Is this how WoTC intends future of FNMs to be like? A place for

>>55229988
Shut the fuck up you baiting pleb

yeah encouraging people to be creative and design their own decks instead of being metaturd #56853 is a bad idea

>>55232429
They should do that by making other archetypes better overall, not by banning the only strategies that don't suck ass.

What i find the most hilarious, is that the only way to check for eligibility is to netdeck.

>>55229988
>FNM
>4.30pm
fucking casuals

>>55232429
>people should be punished to play the game as it was meant to with the cards they published
So you think this is the correct way as opposed to
>WotC should design better sets including better commons/uncommons so standard gets a bigger pool of viable cards and strategies instead of being a rares/mythics only format

>>55232481
To be fair, anti-netdeckers are so far off the mark it doesn't matter. Their ability to identify good cards is nonexistent.

>>55234890
The people at my LGS called me a netdecker scrub for trying to run a modified Petal Festival in Modern. They called Petals of Insight a broken netdecker Spike card.

>>55232429
>encouraging people to be creative
That's not the point of a fucking tournament, you drooling retard. It's not a film festival or an art show, you're not there to show off your donutsteel ideas, you're there to win. Oh, sorry, I mean THEY are there to win, because you've obviously never played anything above REL kitchen table.
>being metaturd
No shit. Playing control necessitates an understanding of the meta. Let me guess, you and your group only play turn 6 craw worms and call any kind of removal or interaction unfair and unfun

Isn't the format for showing card evaluation and creativity really just Sealed?