What would an archaeologist from a far removed future make out of your MTG card collection?
>>55033926
He'd see me for the casual that I am.
Binder filled with mostly jank, trash or fun garbage.
>>55033926
He would mourn the time before the new new new new new new new world order where lich maro decreed that commons can only be 5 mana vanilla 1/1s
"Pfft, fuckin nerd."
>>55033926
why have they got ancient grudge in a folder
>>55033926
They probably wouldn't distinguish it from any other such collection, regardless of its current value.
>>55034186
>MaRo
>Actually able to make any decision about the direction of the game as a wholeYou only hate MaRo because is the face and mouth if WotC. Hate WotC instead
>>55036936
So glad those borders never became a thing.
>She really, really liked Sorin
>>55036936
>>55036982
That counterspell looks rad. I'd love to run one just for the novelty.
>>55037014
...chandere?
>>55033926
>wow this faggot sure loved slivers and the lore!
It's interesting to me the different concepts of "collection" depending who you ask; for me at least it's just having the cards, I don't care about their value or how powerfull their are. Sure I have some powerful expensive cards but they all are in decks, because you know, to play with them. IMO investing in MTG is dumb.
>>55033926
"This is no bone to examine."
>>55033926
>Guess I won't have to look for descendants then
>>55033926
What MtG collection?
Since I have no duplicates on my binders, he'd probably think it was some sort of primitive divination method.
Then if he manages to translate the text, he'd assume that those were a method for teaching children about crude military strategies.
>>55037619
>he doesn't have a foiled out grouphug binder
>>55037661
I certainly don't see the appeal of making cancer look pretty.
>>55033926
>this guy had a weird thing for vampire feet
>>55033926
"Damn, the guy had some good taste"