Do you artificially 'distress' your games and game

>>54800439
Pic from cosplay, or larp? Looks like you're going to dystopia rising. Dont forget to bury those in the dirt for a month.

As for distressing miniatures and such, i also use a power drill/dremel tool with a small bit to do bullet holes, and use green stuff for most anything else.

What? Fuck no. I baby the shit out of my games. I hate when it starts losing color or the ink rubs off the cardboard or pint falls off dice and blah blah.

I mean I get it, when it gets worn it's obviously well loved but that doesn't mean I'm going to ruin it before it's time.

I'd prefer not to "distress" my LEGO bricks/minifigs--I want them to look like they haven't been chewed on or sunbleached

>>54800439
No, my shit is all old and beaten naturally.

>>54800439
If you mean distressing as in weathering minis to show battle damage etc, sometimes. My main wargame is Infinity which fits clean techy look better.

If you meant weathering boardgame meeples/rulebook/cards specifically so they look like well-loved games played for many years, fuck no. That's pretentious faggotry, if I wanted that look I'd just take off card sleeves and take less care in how I store stuff. Also, only games that are actually getting played often deserve that look.

>>54801278
I have a lot of pre-1980 Legos, so I like to use them for scuzzy bathrooms, tenement buildings, and other places that would realistically be made of worn materials. It's a nice contrast with the brand-new pieces.

File: 20e2093d7579d13624859675b1531c87--dress-out-make-a-dress.jpg (78KB, 600x800px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 600x800px

>Not giving your Magic cards artistic water damage

>>54801413
That's an excellent idea, really
I'd probably need to purposefully buy really messed up bricks to get the proper quantities to do the same

>>54801469
>Not giving your magic cards water damage in very specific ways so that you can memorize the water locations on the cards and always know what you're going to draw next

Git Gud

>>54801500
That's a goddamn anime technique.

>>54801469
If I looked hard enough, I might be able to dig up image of nude moderately chubby lady bottom made technically worksafe by Mox Pearl that was kept in place purely by fluid viscosity (or possibly power of suction, I'm still not 100% sure how vaginas function) that was posted on this very board a while ago.
It was double sleeved.

>>54805908

>I'm still not 100% sure how vaginas function

A truer statement has never been spoken.

File: Roasties.png (358KB, 1890x740px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 1890x740px

>>54805908
>or possibly power of suction, I'm still not 100% sure how vaginas function