What alignment is a leader of a country with few natural resources

Lawful evil.

I hope this isn't /pol/

How about a person who acts self servingly and expects nothing else of others, even to the point of encouraging them to do nothing that is not in their self interest, even that would be to the detriment of the person advocating that course of action?

>>54283127
Chaotic Stupid.

>>54283127
Chaotic neutral

>>54283127
"Encouraging them to do nothing that is not in their self interest" seems a little too vague to really nail down to an alignment. Self interest can mean a lot of things

>>54283184
If a rephrase helps, how about "I'm out for me" but part of that self-service includes supporting the belief that it's /right/ to be self serving, and as such taking actions to convince others (typically but not exclusively verbally) to act in accordance with that perspective so as to avoid cognitive dissonance?

>>54283379
In that case I'd second chaotic stupid

>>54282483
American. See "Texas".

Literally every major power in history

>>54282483
Probably Evil, certainly not Good, but this is barely an alignment question.

>>54282483
Second World

True neutral?

>>54284158
responding to >>54283379

>>54283127
Considering that their is no intent to incite them to malicious or benovelent ends I'm going with true neutral as it's pushing people to fulfill their own self interests without aderhance to a code of conduct or any laws regardless of what their self interests are and if they harm people or not

>>54282483
>Ned stark
>anything but lawful good

>>54282483
unaligned
>>54283127
unaligned