What RPGs give stats for high heels? Pathfinder just gave stats

>all benefits, no downside
i see no problems with this and wonder what you point is.

>>54128541
If your main concern with Pathfinder's balance is that wearing heels doesn't affect your character's movement speed or agility I have some bad news for you.

>>54128541

I tend to not bother with rules. If a player really wants to make them an item, they'd probably give a bonus in some social situations and be functional as an improvised or concealed weapon.

Because if you're in a setting where adventurers are in high heels, you're clearly prioritising aesthetic over authenticity and you might as well follow through rather than half arsing it.

>>54128541
An infamous example of "GURPS has rules for everything" has GURPS having rules for high heels.

http://www.barkingduck.net/ehayes/essays/highheel.htm

File: Bagpipe frog.jpg (63KB, 600x469px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 600x469px

>>54129032
Wow, GURPS truly is a fantastic system.

>>54128541
GURPS has two perks for wearing high-heels in a cinematic manner (one for running, another for kicking with a better wounding modifier), and without them you suffer the generic penalty for bad footing (-2 to attack, -1 to defense). Those are the official rules. As funny as >>54129032 is, it's fan material for a dead edition.

File: 1450029690243.jpg (19KB, 366x380px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 366x380px

>>54128541
>Gambeson is not as thick as padded armor

>>54129032
Those are homebrew.

File: 1496787161642.png (696KB, 607x688px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 607x688px

>>54128541
>What RPGs give stats for high heels?
I'm willing to bet FATAL does.

>Pathfinder just gave stats for stiletto heels.
Neat-o

>They're all benefits with no downside.
...ok?

>>54132383
FATAL doesn't have stats for high heels.