Whenever we have a "How do I do a game about X" thread

>>54009800
GM is the host. There's a central issue at stake for the players to argue about (whose child it is, etc.) Audience reacts when players score a point.

Winner is the one with the most points at the end. (You are not the father, it's your mother's fault you did crack not yours, etc.) Loser gets escorted out by security.

>>54009952
I like it. Sort of a competetive game, though players can temporarily team up to negate anothers advantage or boost their own point gain. They can also act out to increase audience hype and boost their own points, but if they hit a certain threshold they pop-off and security restrains them

>>54009800
A version of Everyone is John where all players control the Host. The GM presents the guests, problem, conflict, etc. The Host has to "solve" the problem or bring the guests to some sort of resolution.

Not only would it be fun for the players, being thrust into strange and bizarre situations, but also fun for the GM as he comes up with more and more ridiculous scenarios.

>>54009952
fpbp

>>54009800
>WEEBSHIT
back to /v/ with you redditposter

>>54009952
This would actually work very well with Dogs in the Vineyard as a system