How do you go about portraying a character that's meant

File: 77f6ebf3b518df892c7a6b39d636b41f.jpg (1MB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1600x1200px

Use a waifu picture from Pixiv/Danbooru.

File: Magical Realming.png (195KB, 635x354px) Image search: [Google]

195KB, 635x354px

>>53404985
Stick to adventuring and dungeon-delving instead of making the game about how "sexy" you character is and constantly trying to Magical Realm.

>>53405033
>trying to Magical Realm.
>anything that isn't murder-hoboing is magical realm

You're probably a boring guy to game with.

File: straw-man.png (321KB, 384x384px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 384x384px

>>53405048

File: Retard Alert.gif (480KB, 493x342px) Image search: [Google]

480KB, 493x342px

>>53405048
>Get told to stop making the game about retarded sex fetishes
>Immediately thinks the only other thing to possibly do in a game is murder-hobo

>>53405064
>>53405096
>Stick to adventuring and dungeon-delving
>only other thing to possibly do in a game is murder-hobo
Gee, I wonder where he got that idea.

File: common tongue.png (16KB, 167x230px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 167x230px

>>53405104
>Adventuring = Murderhoboing

Quit while you're ahead, kid. Every post you make just makes you look even more retarded than you've already proven to be. This is an 18+ website, mmmkay?

>>53404985
You give a description of the characters physique, or does as this guy says >>53405029 and give your players a picture. I mean, there is no sexy stat most of the time, so you really have to tell them. Ultimately you have to give them a reason why that person is sexy, someone that doesn't like cowtits might not be impressed by that character, though he should understand why others are.

>>53404985
I roll two more dice on social checks and I know it. Maybe, sometimes mention things my character does to keep good looks. "Sexy" is just mostly beneficial part of character's appearance, don't pay too much attention to it.

>>53404985
There are VAST arrays of subjects that it is both wise and useful to ask /tg/ about.
These subjects include, but are not limited to, spider storage, celestial physics, alternative history geopolitics, cryptozoological taxidermy, and anything remotely or tangentially related to traditional games.
"How to Be Sexy" has NEVER been one such subject.

I honestly don't know what you were thinking, OP.

>>53405127
>This is an 18+ website
So what are you doing here? I'm sure when you grow up you'll realize that people often flirt with each other without it necessarily being about sex.

>>53405128
Sexy is either a separate advantage (disadvantage if you play a game about prison) or one of ways to describe your high CHA.

File: 1457072436265.jpg (183KB, 656x425px) Image search: [Google]

183KB, 656x425px

>>53405160
>No you

Wow, stunning counter-argument. I especially like the part afterwards where you pretend to have changed the argument, while not adressing any of the previous points. Still waiting to hear why you think adventuring automatically means murderhoboing.

>>53404985
What's the point of the corset when everything else is uncovered

>>53405160
>Butthurt underaged user has to parade how underaged he is by resorting to screeching "NO YOU!"

>>53405190
Why would I argue with you? You know what they say about arguing with idiots.

File: laff.gif (202KB, 500x284px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 500x284px

>>53405211
>I quit! So I win! Ignore that I didn't answer of the points raised or actually have any kind of counter-argument other than "no you!" the entire time.

OK, kiddo.

In before the butthurt builds to critical levels and you reply again anyway.

>>53405198
To keep her waist slim, why else?

>>53405211
>You know what they say about arguing with idiots.
Not sure. That it's more challenging than pointing out how stupid your posts are?

>>53405211
>Doesn't want to argue with "idiots"
>Posts on 4chan

You poor victim you, being forced to be a member of a community just does get you and doesn't understand why you're always right and they're always wrong. If only you could fuck off and go somewhere else so none of us would have to suffer... oh wait.

Yeah, do that, fuck off so neither of us have to suffer. Faggot.

>>53405198
>>53405228
Perhaps the wings are fake?
Or perhaps it's a hernia truss.

Well this thread went to shit fast.

Next time pick a sexy male picture to start to keep the faggots happy, OP.

>>53405288
Yeah, but sometimes it's satisfying to see a shitposter get reamed so hard. I enjoyed the show, and now we can get back on topic.

>>53405288
He asked /tg/ for advice on being sexy.
What was to be expected?

>>53405302
>we can get back on topic
I don't think we can. The "REEE MAGICAL REALM" crowd is already here, likely attracted by the OP picture. It was already ruined by the first post.

>>53405316
Some advice on how to roleplay characters outside of one's comfort zone? Maybe a femme fatale or a seductive vampire?

>>53405033
That was quite possibly the least helpful advice you could have possibly given for this thread's context.

File: FantasyFoxgirl.jpg (70KB, 751x1063px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 751x1063px

>>53404985
Fluffy ears and tail are a must.

>>53405033
>assuming
Why do you have to make everything an ass like you, anon? Are you feeling lonely?

>>53405198
It's a kink thing.

Why does summer attract so many underaged faggots anyway?

>>53404985
>I find having the character be overtly flirtatious is a boring/overplayed way of doing it.
Maybe because sexy people aren't overtly flirtatious IRL.
They're beautiful and confident, at the same time they're welcoming and unattainable. Find a way to convey this and you won't have to futilely describe a character as "sexy" ever more, they will just be.

>>53404985
Descriptive words;
>Buxom
>Bombshell
>Ripped
>Dashing
>Scatily clad

And describe their actions as forward
>"as she talks to you she leans inward, giving you a decent glance at her chest and winking"
>"He notices your gaze and flexes his muscles"

If they aren't physicially or traditionally sexy make them flirtatious, so the player knows.

If the "flirtee" doesn't express interest don't keep making the flirt wag their tiddies at them, at some point (sooner or later) the character would realize they aren't getting anywhere and likely move on to easier conquest.

>>53405808
This sounds reasonable

>>53405159
Kek, best post in the thread

>>53405198
Corsets still minimize the waist and make the hips flare in comparison, which is the point anyway.

>>53404985
I describe her/him in prose and focus on commonly accepted beauty details. Muscles, slim, immaculate skin, good smell, pearlwhite teeth with an indecent grin.

You don't have to show any pictues. And you don't have to describe the character/NPC as "sexy" at all. Just do the physical features and let the rest of the idea play in the head of the players.

>>53404985
To be honest?
Just know what your players are into. If they like shy girls, a girl being shy is going to be the sexiest thing ever, and you barely even have to try.

Sexiness is highly subjective. You can be better at roleplaying than an Oscar-winning actress is at acting, and do a flawless sultry succubus act, only to it be seen in the eyes of another person as "oh so this npc is a whore trying too hard to get clients? kek"

>>53405159
>cryptozoological taxidermy
If you replace the main eyes of a Gorgon is it safe to mount the head on a wall, or should you replace the eyes of the snakes as well

>>53406986
On that note, serious inquiry, would giving your gorgon waifu cybernetic replacement eyes bypass her flaw?

>>53405160
>literally a "NO YOU" response
Wowsers

>>53404985
>oh god, I can feel something poking the back of my head and her hands are already on my shoulders

>>53405198
If you have to ask...

>>53406986
>If you replace the main eyes of a Gorgon is it safe to mount the head on a wall, or should you replace the eyes of the snakes as well
In almost all cases, I believe it is safe once her eyes have been removed.
(No small feat to do cleanly.)
However, the snake eyes should also be removed, not for safety concern, but aesthetic display purposes.

>>53407020
>On that note, serious inquiry, would giving your gorgon waifu cybernetic replacement eyes bypass her flaw?
If you regard it a flaw, certainly.
Alternatively, consider permanent cybernetic eye-shielding.
The more truly lovely and life-like coverings, while more expensive, can also prevent harmful gazing and yet allow a aperture to utilize her natural defenses when appropriate, with only a 3% risk of accidental petrification.

File: matrixt6thtimeatleast.gif (46KB, 408x410px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 408x410px

By telling OP to stop making these threads ad nauseam.

>>53405159
>cryptozoological taxidermy
Hell yeah, I can talk your ear off about cryptozoological taxidermy. And I will.

>>53406986
>If you replace the main eyes of a Gorgon is it safe to mount the head on a wall
Nah, you have to replace the whole head. She's THAT ugly.

Something they didn't elaborate on in the old stories is that the "turning to stone" thing is actually a defense mechanism. The body turns itself to stone because it's much preferable to contemplating gorgon-face.

It might take you a little longer to turn to stone from just looking at, say, a gorgon nose or ear. But it will still happen.

Seduce everything
/thread

>>53407199
This is literally the first time this thread has ever been made.

>>53407209
See, this is weird to me, because the GREEKS AND ROMANS, of all people, should not be averse to a hideous face. They'd fuck anything.

>>53406934
this is the only real answer.

File: 1488858191608.jpg (249KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

249KB, 1280x720px

>>53405033
>1999+18
>Not magical realming

>>53407229
The hell are you talking about? Classical cultures were obsessed with physical beauty.

>>53409369
And fucking sheep. And ducks. And cows. And pissing on maidens.

File: laocoon[1].jpg (54KB, 664x700px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 664x700px

>>53407229
>>53409369
Literally A E S T H E T I C S : the culture

>>53409680
I always wondered why they are supposed to be beautiful with a small dick like that

>>53409712
They didn't give a shit about pleasing a woman, so having a small dick was fine.

>>53409712
Because then everyobody would just stare at the dicks.

File: 1411511864200.png (146KB, 375x424px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 375x424px

>>53409712
They're supposed to be desexualized. What matters is the overall aesthetics of the body, and the belief was that by de-emphasizing the genitals, their sexuality is de-emphasized (this is also related to the BBC meme: slavers made it up to make their slaves appear more bestial, more uncivilized, more inhuman and more lustdriven).

The problem is that we live in such an oversexualized culture we'd end up commenting on their dicks anyway, big or small.

>>53409896
the really strangest thing about modern western culture is that we are so sexualized and yet sex is still a huge taboo.

I wonder if we had a more sex-positive culture if we would end up less sexualized overall.

>>53410039
The easiest way to end up thinking about something constantly is to constantly try to not think about it.

>>53410063
Don't think about pink elephants on parade.

>>53410039
>and yet sex is still a huge taboo
What "western culture" are you even talking about? Surely not the same western culture where the average porn viewer is 12 years old, primetime commercials can feature topless women, there are faggot parades where grown men wear tight thongs and masturbate in public, and a woman offering up her tits and vagina to be fondled is considered "art", right? We have overthrown every taboo that there is to be overthrown. The only taboo left is the concept of taboo.

>>53410144
You are confusing what taboo means. We are obsessed with sex, but we don't ever talk about it in any meaningful way.

When was the last time any non-fine arts media had a serious and mature discussion about sex?

>Many schools teach abstinence-only sex ed.
>Sex ed apps are banned from app stores.
>Most "serious" media tends to pretend sexuality doesn't exist.
>A lot of people still think access to contraceptives and safe sex practices encourages sex
>For a lot of young people, the only education they ever receive about sex is through porn, to a point where even porn sites are recognizing the problem and hosting sex ed videos

>>53410385
>Many schools teach abstinence-only sex ed.
Oh, you're American. That explains a lot.

>>53410451
Look, us americans have it hard trying to get our country to not be/turn into a shithole

File: 5978634+_213e203a54bf97fb54a962eda09e421a[1].png (189KB, 500x343px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 500x343px

>>53410480
>Your largest group of immigrants are catholic and not muslim
>They're also from a somewhat functional democracy and generally respect the liberal heritage all Western cultures have in common
As with geography, with your immigration you're playing on easy mode.

>>53410451
>Oh, you're American. That explains a lot.
I know there is the trope of Americans thinking the US is the entire world, but the US is a very sizeable chunk of the western world and as far west as you can go without it turning into east.

>>53410526
Anon, we are managing a country that spans a continent and trying to do it with a democratic republic.
The sheer weight of people trying to ruin it for one reason or another is enormous.

>>53410144

What western cultures are you talking about where it is NOT taboo?

>>53410551
It's always fucking france.

>>53410551
Netherlands actually.
>>53410568
You do know prostitution is illegal in France right now, right? Like the meme country that is Sweden, its view on sexuality is entirely hypocritical. It's far from the libertine stereotype of before WW2.

>>53410526
> Your largest group of immigrants are catholic and not muslim
Spic "catholicism" is basically marxism. Just look at the current "pope."

>They're also from a somewhat functional democracy and generally respect the liberal heritage all Western cultures have in common
Fucking hilarious. One, no, they're not functioning democracies. They're warzones ruled by drug cartels. Two, they have no respect for anything other than getting their next handout. And three, there is nothing "liberal" about the values that western civilization was built on. Liberalism is just the disease that is trying to kill those values.

>>53410385
Tbf the narrative these days in American schools these days is less "abstinence or burn in hell" and more "abstinence is the only 100% effective way to prevent pregnancy and STDs, but here are your options", which is a true statement barring autistic nitpicking.

>>53410623

>And three, there is nothing "liberal" about the values that western civilization was built on.

Give me your tired, your poor,
Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free,
The wretched refuse of your teeming shore.
Send these, the homeless, tempest-tossed to me,
I lift my lamp beside the golden door!

>>53410644
That referred to legal immigrants, who would assimilate and contribute. It was never meant to apply to criminals streaming across the border intend on sucking the country dry.

File: 1489625060796.png (591KB, 583x720px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 583x720px

>>53410623
>And three, there is nothing "liberal" about the values that western civilization was built on.
I forgot I was talking to Americans again. Why the hell does "liberal" mean something else to you than to literally everyone else on the fucking planet?

>>53410656
>That referred to legal immigrants, who would assimilate and contribute

So should the Puritans have assimilated into the native american culture?

>>53410644
And look what that gets you. That liberal garbage has turned once prosperous nations into third world hellholes where whites are killed in the streets on a daily basis.

>>53410669
Yes, they *should* have if we approach these events from the native perspective. In case you didn't notice, the puritans didn't assimilate and now said natives live in reserves as a tiny and oppressed minority in a country that has transformed into something unrecognizable. Food for thought.

>>53410662
Because america is rapidly becoming a hellscape and nobody believes us.

>>53410662
Because the liberals in America have turned it into marxism 2.0

>>53410686
Not really, anon.
I mean, they seem mostly interested in basic socialized healthcare like the other first world nations.

>>53410662
Name a single "liberal" value that has helped build western civilization.

>>53410635
It varies by state and in some cases by school district, and in many cases parents can (and do) opt their children out of sex ed.

>abstinence is the only 100% effective way to prevent pregnancy and STDs, but here are your options
My sex ed in school consisted of a slide of anatomy and then an hour of looking at photos of oozing nasty STIs.

But even if it were more of the modern style, it still only focuses on the negatives. Sex is a part of human life for most adults, though maybe less often the case for people on /tg/. We should be able to talk about more than just the risks.

>>53410712
expansion.
new ideas.
you know, any difference from the norm that was pre-western civilization.

>>53410712

Private Property?

Seriously, John Locke is considered one of the first liberalist philosophers and he was very focused on liberty and personal property.

>>53405228
She looks like her waist is already slim, honestly.

>>53410728

>It varies by state and in some cases by school district, and in many cases parents can (and do) opt their children out of sex ed.

Seriously, what is with the lack of federal organisation for stuff with American politics? Almost everything about american education ends up 'Depends on the state'

>>53410767
Private property is a conservative value that liberals reject in favor of socialism.

>>53410789
Because america is the size of like a million britains.

>>53406986
I seem to recall that the Gorgons. faces were the dangerous part, not the eyes.

famous taxidermy
furry trout
Jenny Hanover
hybrid monkey/fish mermaid
jackalope
any others?

>>53410712
>what was the renaissance

>>53410802
Socialist systems also have private property in them, anon.

>>53410802

So 'The father of liberalism', John Locke is...not liberal?

>>53410832
The American conservatives are kind of nutbar, anon. You run into this stuff a lot.

>>53404985
>you find a woman
Ok.

>she is sexy
Right.

>like very, very sexy anon
Sure.

>you feel attracted to her
Fine, anway give me the next clue.

>>53410712
I'm going to cite that one where legitimacy to rule flows from the people instead of divine mandate. Personal fav.

>>53410821
No they don't. The state can just seize whatever it wants. The right to private property is completely ignored under socialism.

>>53410712

A rejection of the divine right of kings.

>>53410855
Anon, the state can CURRENTLY seize whatever it wants. That's always been a thing. It's how the highways got built.
Though in all seriousness, there are many socialist systems that include private property. Like, say, America. Socialized roads, private cars.

>>53410832
Respect for individual freedom and private property rights makes you a conservative. Liberals reject both those things.

>>53410712
All of them until recently. Neo-liberalism is nothing like classical liberalism.

>>53410855

Can't every single government do that without provisions to say otherwise?

>>53410832
I can understand where he's coming from. Locke was liberal back then, but today is private property > anything else pretty much regarded as a right wing notion. Things change.

>>53410881
Which liberals have replaced with the divine right of fags.

>>53410887
States are at least a little bit socialistic by their mere nature.

>>53410890
It doesn't help that neo-conservatives have nothing to do with actually being conservative.
There's no fucking thing as a fiscal conservative candidate in america any more.
It sucks, but it makes sense when you realize hippies are slightly more responsible with their money than rednecks. And that is basically what the parties are. Hippies and rednecks.

>a shitty topic turns into an actually pretty good discussion
>/pol/ arrives to shit things up as usually

>>53410910

So Liberalism is 'Anything I currently don't like?' As if you go about redefining terms to be literally the opposite of themselves it makes them kinda pointless.

Could we go back to the subject of lonely neckbeards talking dirty to each other around a table, please?

>>53410890
>Neo-liberalism is nothing like classical liberalism
It kind of is, though. Neo-liberalism is about applying the same values as classical liberalism to companies rather than individuals. Not saying that it's a good thing, just saying there's a relation between the two.

File: arguing on the internet.jpg (360KB, 846x1024px) Image search: [Google]

360KB, 846x1024px

>>53410938

Creating a sexy character doesn't have to be about neckbeards heavy breathing around a table.

It could be fore theming reasons.

>>53410910

The issue there is that the subject is:

>Name a single "liberal" value that has helped build western civilization.

They were liberal values. They helped build civilisation as we know it.

>>53410927
> implying hippies are good for anything but target practice
> implying hippies aren't the least responsible idiots out there
You need to go back.

>>53410803
>Because america is the size of like a million britains.
It's Math!

Has something to do with that metric/imperial conversion I expect.

>>53410789
Actual reason traces to the historical origins of the country. Each of the original US states was originally its own colony, with its own government and only a tenuous connection to homeland in Europe. Over the centuries between the start of colonization and the revolution, they evolved into entities that were basically their own countries. Post-revolt, they ceded powers to the federal government only very reluctantly. The core structure of american gov is that the federal government has just enough power to do its job, and everything that's not explicitly listed as a federal power defaults to the states.

>>53410986
Hippies, as it turns out, waste SLIGHTLY LESS MONEY than rednecks.
It would help if rednecks got off their ass and did something profitable, instead of taking government corn handouts. That might turn it around a little.

>>53410938
Can't blame this just on /pol/ arriving. Just check any 40k group on facebook you'll see the trump troopers there screaming just as loud.

/pol/ has always been here.

>>53411003
>>53410986
Technically, the hippy makes 0 dollars, and the redneck makes negative dollars.
Both are fucking awful, but if you have to choose, take nothing over actively losing money.

>>53410939
>So Liberalism is 'Anything I currently don't like?
No, that's [insert ideology I don't like]. You are getting carried away. Please don't ask such loaded questions.
>As if you go about redefining terms to be literally the opposite of themselves it makes them kinda pointless.
I didn't do it. It's just as it is. Private property is not a thing leftists usually hold in high regard. But Locke can be seen as a "progressive" of his time.

>>53410984
This question really depends on if you or that anon mean liberal back then or right now.

>>53410966
What do arguments over the term "liberal" have to do with portraying sexy characters?

Sex-positivity/negativity in culture obviously plays into how sexy characters can/should be portrayed.

I mean look at these posts. None of them actually relate to the OP in any way, not even tangentially.
>>53410984
>>53410986
>>53411002
>>53411003
>>53411024
>>53411033

>>53411002
>he core structure of american gov is that the federal government has just enough power to do its job, and everything that's not explicitly listed as a federal power defaults to the states.

Seems rather inefficient as a whole.

>>53410974
True.
Having one character who is seductive can be hard. Specially if you hadn't touched the subject before, because what the hell does sexy mean?

>>53411003
Hippies waste far more money on "organic" bullshit and gibmedats than even the worst conservatives. Unlike hippies, Conservatives actually work.

>>53410910
Sure, but if you take that point of view then liberal always means "things changing" and conservative always means "things staying the same"... which basically means the Anon is asking us to name something from the future which changed something in the past.

It's literally a circular definition. Anything that DID help build western civilization is conservative, anything that WILL help build it is liberal (or if you're ConservAnon, will help "destroy" it, presumably).

The entire concept of sexy depends entirely who's at the table.

But we can all agree that the barmaid wearing a shirt that shows off a bit too much chest is considered sexy, right?

Hence it's really how the character is portrayed more than anything else.

>>53411033
>No, that's [insert ideology I don't like]. You are getting carried away. Please don't ask such loaded questions.

It was loaded but that's because it's frustrating to have 'Hey, that thing that is literally the definition of liberal by the founder of the concept of liberal? Yeah, it's not REALLY liberal'. It's like fighting the no-true-scotsman argument.

>>53411057
Statistically, redneck states make far less money than hippy states with the exception of only texas.

Hippies grow things that are profitable, like drugs. Rednecks grow things that are actively costing the taxpayer money, like corn.

>>53410728
>We should be able to talk about more than just the risks.
And you are. As a parent you are free to talk about sex as much as you like, but I would rather to take care of my own children social upbringing thank you very much.

>>53411091
>Hippies grow things that are profitable, like drugs. Rednecks grow things that are actively costing the taxpayer money, like corn.
Why was this so funny?

File: knight.jpg (193KB, 830x815px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 830x815px

>>53404985
Well if you make 'em really big that'll get me all hot and bothered.

For normies though you'll probably just want to give them a cute personality. Maybe make them a monstergirl too.

>>53411089
It's not liberal because liberals don't support it.

>>53411109
Shouldn't that be backwards?

>>53411101
Because it is a ridiculous but true scenario caused by crazy policies.

File: 1439526257080.png (2MB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1280x720px

>>53411107
>really big
Anything over twice your size is heresy.

>>53411109

Considering Locke founded it, wouldn't it be that other people are not Liberals because they are not following him then?

>>53410938
Question is, why hasn't anyone learned after all this time that you report them and wait until their vacation arrives?

>>53411036
>I mean look at these posts. None of them actually relate to the OP in any way, not even tangentially.
Anon is right. Apologies for my part in perpetuating the derailment. Quick, someone post a sexy thing!!

>>53411044
>Seems rather inefficient as a whole.
Yeeeeah. One battle at a time though, Anon, one battle at a time.

>>53411163
>One battle at a time though, Anon, one battle at a time.
What do you mean by this? I hope you don't mean cutting down states rights.

File: 1494349709682.jpg (36KB, 483x804px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 483x804px

>>53411163
>Quick, someone post a sexy thing!!
Here you go familiaris

File: e57aa10094c5ed52ee2d3713e6a0d36b[1].jpg (71KB, 736x857px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 736x857px

>>53411194
>familiaris
Lewd

>>53411152
Because that doesn't work?

>>53411163
>Quick, someone post a sexy thing!!
Shit man, If I knew this've easy.

I believe general rule of thumb is that descriptions are sexy.

The more small (appealing) details you add to a character (both physically and personality wise) the sexier they come off.

File: elves.jpg (911KB, 1400x1350px) Image search: [Google]

911KB, 1400x1350px

>>53404985
>>53411107
Oh, don't forget elves! Elves are sexy.

In fact, you know what, just make giant elven monstergirls and see how that goes. I'm sure it will work out.

>>53411191
>What do you mean by this? I hope you don't mean cutting down states rights.
I was replying more to the "government is inefficient" comment, and only at a superficial level. Discussions of the relative merits of levels of government and separation of powers is one for another thread (please).

>>53411237
>that pic
Why isn't she just blowing some air out of her nose? That shit should send all of the antmen flying away.

What kind of sexy?
>Visually
Literally nothing wrong with describing a character's appearance with words like "Alluring", or "seductive", to denote physical beauty of the "If you're attracted to this sex you probably want to fuck it" variety. For a male character you'd probably want to use the words "Handsome" and whatnot instead.
>Intently
Usually a character who's intently trying to be sexy will be wearing something alluring that you can describe. A character could be very forward and flirtatious, but you called that boring and overplayed. Besides that being overly friendly works but hey maybe that's too close to being overly flirtatious like you said.

>>53411257
maybe she doesn't want to hurt them

With such thin ropes it would be hard to restrain someone of that size anyway. The strands of her hair would be more durable than their ropes.

Had they used steel cables or something it would be a different story

>>53411294

It is a little overused. Usually I like to present a character with simple detail but further interactions yield more small actions to increase the charm of the character. you don't have to use such words as it can come off as flowery.

>>53411107
>Playfully closing in on the human with her bare feet
>Human swinging a sword at her
This image looks like it's 3 seconds away from being a picture of her tearfully clutching at a tiny little cut on her foot, with that small human in the background as a bloody smear on the ground. Much less adorable if you ask me.

File: elf.gif (2MB, 1067x720px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1067x720px

>>53411322
The ropes appear to be magically held to the ground. Maybe she's being restrained by magic?

>>53405772
kids are out of classes

>>53411257
>>53411322
At that giant's size, falling forward onto her face was probably crippling or worse--same reason that progressively larger creatures are progressively more injured from falls. She's not blowing air out of her nose because her lungs have been punctured by her broken ribs.

File: elf.jpg (279KB, 1157x815px) Image search: [Google]

279KB, 1157x815px

>>53411401
Oh jeez, now I see why she's crying.

>>53411377
>elf
But that's a gun.

>>53411421
I KNOW ITS A GUN! HOW MANY FUCKING TIMES DO I HAVE TO BE TOLD THAT ITS A FUCKING GUN!?

>>53411401
How would they bring her down in the first place, let alone tie her to the ground?

I would have thought they would have attacked her while sleeping like in that one piece of old literature

>>53405029
But I'm trying to find a sexy dwarf girl

>>53411495
Look up the dwarf princess from dragon commander. You might like her.

>>53411442
It's still the same filename.

File: demon.jpg (1MB, 2000x1998px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2000x1998px

>>53411445
Same way you bring down a monster in Dark Souls. 1000 tiny pokes to the ankles.

>>53411556
that's not how I kill bosses in dark souls.
I use like eight hits with an axe who's head is the size of their leg from the knee down.

File: SnowStug.jpg (790KB, 1052x646px) Image search: [Google]

790KB, 1052x646px

>>53411539
You're like that guy who kept telling me to change the name of pic related from "SnowTank" to "SnowStug" because it wasn't a "tank".

>>53411577
Now change that back to let the cycle continue.

>>53411517
Sexy, but she looks too bitchy to be a pet-loving shy girl.

File: Myra_Tyrngaarde_Fanart.jpg (971KB, 1440x900px) Image search: [Google]

971KB, 1440x900px

>>53411649
What about her?

>>53411679
Perfect

File: Dwarf_f7e208_5414381.jpg (58KB, 684x599px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 684x599px

>>53411679
For some reason I was expecting her to be fat and stocky, with a beard. Was pleasantly surprised to be wrong.

>>53410623
This guy is kinda right, Central American Catholicism is very unlike the sort you'd find in say, Bavaria.

>>53410662
Americans don't understand that Classical Liberalism is not the same as this Marxist shit.
When we say Conservative and Liberal we mean conservative and progressive.

>>53406018
Not OP, but this is pretty useful, thank you.

I'm working on a M&M campaign and i have an idea for a reptile/snake-themed burlesque queen as an adversary

>>53411401
>applying the square-cube law to anime
cue up that "sound of a thousand simultaneous facepalms" track, Jim

>>53411445
>I would have thought they would have attacked her while sleeping like in that one piece of old literature
Ah yes, that one. One of my favorites, that.

>>53411679
She's got really nice loaves.

File: gywnevere.jpg (463KB, 1200x900px) Image search: [Google]

463KB, 1200x900px

>>53411445
>I would have thought they would have attacked her while sleeping like in that one piece of old literature
>>53411860
>Ah yes, that one. One of my favorites, that.

Ummm...sauce?

>>53411877
Gwynevere was certainly not THAT enormous.

>>53405096
I didnt read your post i just want you to think about the fact that it is 2017 and you posted a south park reaction gif

File: gullivers-travels.jpg (69KB, 512x252px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 512x252px

>>53411877
gulliver's travels

>>53411933
Fukken Lilliputians and their dirty tricks

>>53410712
>being that uneducated
For your own sake, read a history book, chapters about XVI-XIX century.
Stop gaining knowledge from pol and pepe memes and educate yourself.

And no I will not name such easy thing to find, learn and do yourself a favor.

>>53411577
He's not wrong, stupid but not wrong.

>>53411577
Honestly if you wanna get really picky you should name it Snow Sturmgeschutz lll ausf G

File: gg.jpg (677KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

677KB, 1600x900px

>>53411897
She was pretty darn big, anon.

Actually, I'm having a similar issue in a few games.

Not trying to magical realm my characters, most are attractive women, but not interested in the sexual escapades as much. Not adverse to the character gaining a love interest, but all the same.

But across two groups now, I see people who play in the party, super slutty characters (Sorceresses powered by the power of their curves & Genetalia in one, I am only slightly embellishing that, and then a pirate who just says "we should fuck" and my character blows him off). And in both, I start getting a holy virgin vibe.

I'd like to think I'm just being realistic, but when it comes to a test of qualities and one was Beauty, and they chose the half orc barbarian before mine, I got kinda miffed. I figure the problem could very well lie with me, and maybe a play of my delivery. But I find it hard to believe I have to roleplay that I'm lowering my blouse as I speak in order to be seen as anything other than half orc level.

>>53413430
You don't need to do slutty things to help get across that your character is attractive. Aside from your description of her you should also be able to convey it through her attitude and speech patterns. You could base her speech patterns on famous femme fatales or just have her act as if she assumes everyone she meets is attracted to her, for example.

>>53404985
Make a waifu.

>>53411091
Would California be classified as hippie or redneck?

>>53417465
Yes.

>>53417465
>Would California be classified as hippie or redneck?
the sf bay area is very corporate so neither

>>53404985
I don't, I find it creepy and weird

I mean, it's tolerable online on stuff like roll20 where you don't know the other person IRL, but having a sweaty neckbeard across the table flirting is really fucking creepy

>>53411679
That looks like a gnome or a halfling

Not thicc enough

File: horny midgets.jpg (6MB, 4903x2655px) Image search: [Google]

6MB, 4903x2655px

>>53411495
Why not look for draphs?

http://danbooru.donmai.us/posts?utf8=&tags=doraf+rating%3ASafe

>>53404985
A big part of GMing is agreeing on expectations with your group.
This can mean listening to expectations, but mostly involves /creating/ them.

This is how you agree on what genre to run your campaign in, how you know what to change if a player is unhappy, and how you know what your group is looking forward to.
But part of creating expectations is a social contract.

Your group agrees to follow the plot, because they asked for a story.
Your group agrees to delve the dungeon, because they ask for a dungeon crawler.
Your group agrees to try feeling scared, because they asked for horror.


If your group breaks the contract, you pause the game and say,
"I don't have material for that. If you don't want to get back on task. I can wing something new. But it might suck."
and after the session you have a long chat to establish expectations. This is one of the parts where you mostly listen.

But, within the social contract, you have a degree of control over how the characters act.
A lot of GM tips say, "don't tell a player how their character feels." That's bullshit.

If a player asks for horror, you should tell them "your dude thinks this is scary."
If a player asks for dungeon crawling, you should tell them "invent a reason for you dude to want to plumb the murder-hole."
If a player asks for plot, you should tell them "this is a plot relevant NPC, form an attachment."
>How do you go about portraying a character that's meant to be 'sexy', either a DM or a player?
Describe the NPC as attractive or sensual when you introduce them. Then move on.
If the NPC matters to the plot (and if the plot matters to the game) you can suggest romance (or lust) when saying that the NPC matters.

>>53410712
Anon, when people outside of the US say "liberal," it means a different thing than it does in the US. Think founding fathers rather than Democrats.

>>53410850
>>53410736
>>53410812
>>53412041

Not the same anon, but being a historyfag, I can say that Europe had more development under Autocratic monarchs like Louis XIV, the Hohenzollerns, and Peter the Great.

The USA is actually the exception to the rule than not.

I think the real answer to Europe developing as well as it did comes from
1) Patronage of Arts and Sciences from Nobility and Clergy
and
2)State mandated education- which isn't a liberal value in practice, as it was mostly conservative monarchies like Prussia and Austria that first really implemented them.

Public Education is a great tool for monarchies and not so much for classical liberals in that
a/ it provides a monarch with better educated subjects by and large
and
b/it allows said monarch to mostly control what information his subjects can or cannot learn.

File: 1455299829177.jpg (203KB, 880x651px) Image search: [Google]

203KB, 880x651px

>>53422514
To be fair
1. Louis XIV's absolutism came mostly from bypassing the nobility (and even then not to such a massive extent as we like to imagine) rather than some sort of proto-totalitarianism. And to bypass that nobility, he needed an administration of commoners. Louis XIV even revived the institution of the Three Estates, which only stopped being assembled as he died until the French Revolution because the nobles regained a lot of power after he died under the atrocious Louis XV (think about it like this: if the most absolutist king's successors were anything like him, it's very well possible they'd have a de facto parliament. Really makes the lines between the two forms of governance vaguer).

2. Frederick the Great was the textbook example of an Enlightened Despot. Everything about him, from his way of governance to his invitation of Voltaire after his exile from France (under the aforementioned atrocious Louis XV), was liberal. Keep in mind that not all liberals wanted to overthrow the monarchy, Voltaire distrusted the masses, Rousseau acknowledged France was so big it required a king to run everything effectively and the first post-Bastille constitution made the king effectively a hereditary president-for-life.

3. I don't see how the rise of Germany and the rule of the Hohenzollerns is anything but coincidence. Bismarck united a huge power in the middle of Europe during a time where industry in it just happened to flourish. I don't see the personal influence of that dynasty in anything other than starting a world war and diplomacy so shitty it should be used in textbooks to show what NOT to do.

So in the first two we see respectively the first steps towards liberalism (debatably and ironically) and liberalism put into practice.

>>53422691
The great irony of Bismarck as a chieftain of conservative politics, is that he invented the welfare state, recognizing the need to keep the worker loyal through a dole provided by the state, to prevent unrest and potential uprisings.

Essentially a lot of what's called 'leftist' these days have a 'conservative' origin. (I use both terms very generally)

File: Kulturkampf+3202192[1].jpg (2MB, 4065x2502px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4065x2502px

>>53422722
To be fair Bismarck was internally at war with Catholics, Poles and Socialists alike. Introducing the welfare state allowed him to sweep the rug out from under the socialists and pacify its supporters. It was an entirely pragmatic move.

>>53422844
>It was an entirely pragmatic move.
Conservatives have lost sight of pragmatism for political ideology, and they'll rue it.

>>53404985
You mention your character wears revealing clothing sometimes and then you forget about except when a persuasion skill test of some sort is required.

Or rather, that is what mature people do when roleplaying instead of furiously masturbating under the table and pretending nobody else can hear it.

>>53423174
I am both OP and the third post in that image.

>>53422722

Left and Right are pretty damn vague terms at the best of times. Heck, even Liberal and Conservative are most of the time (At least, how they are used in general conversation). At this point all the terms basically just mean 'Person I don't like' with it varying who's saying them.

File: 1b9[1].jpg (43KB, 640x539px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 640x539px

>>53423174
>>53423196
I'm the second guy in that pic
It always makes me happy whenever my posts are screencapped

>>53405159
I'm sorry anon, but you missed several topics, such as anal capacity regarding marbles.