You guys told me that Games Workshop was in financial trouble.

>>52890613
Welcome to /tg/. Where people complain about anything possible.

>>52890613
>Why did you lie to me?
Butthurt Grognards.

>>52890613
>stocks are everything

Are you that dumb or just pretending?

Lehman Brothers stocks were doing fine days before the bankruptcy.

>>52890704

What are you implying?

>>52890613
Go look up forbes articles on them. They are in trouble.

>>52890613

Are you retarded? Look at the chart. For the past two years, they WERE doing badly. Its only in the past few months they are doing well.

How can you not figure this out?

>>52890780
Im not aware of the timeline, but Id guess their resurgence has something to do with releasing actual playable rules for AoS.

Im really not sure why GW is seemly so convinced that non-matched play can every sustain a game.

>>52890780
>GW is doing good
>BUT LOOK AT THIS ONE PART OF TIME WHERE THEY WERE DOING BAD! SEE, IT MEANS THEY'RE GOING TO DIE FOR NOT BUFFING MY ARMIES.

lol /tg/ is so delusional and easy to trigger

>>52890854

Thats not what Im saying, you sperg.

Im saying that the last two years of people pointing to the slow death of GW were true at the time. Its only recently that they pulled out of a nosedive.

>>52890613
What you actually thought what random people said on the internet was true?

>>52890613
Games Workshop is actually not a very clever company. It took them until around 2010 to realise that Internet shopping was here to stay.

>>52890613
misrepresentation and suggestive manipulation: the post. Shame on you, shill.

>>52890780

They are doing slightly better now only because of royalties they get from video games.

File: (u).jpg (46KB, 689x602px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 689x602px

>>52890854
>being this autistic

>>52891143
Steve Jackson Games is stuck in the 90's if it helps.

>>52891913
They don't have all those physical stores that GW invested so much money and effort into, right?