ITT Characters you want to play
If you want: Characters you want to combine
>>52768914
>Samurai Jack
Patrician tas-
>edgy, party disrupting, leddit-tier nihilist "intellectual"
How can a man's taste be so plebian and so patrician at the same time?
>>52769055
>nihilist
>rick sanchez
I don't think you understand Rick. In fact, I don't think anyone understands Rick. In fact, I think Rick doesn't understands Rick. That's what makes him a lovely character. One day he's on top of the world. The next day, he's building a death laser to kill himself.
>>52769155
You vastly overestimate the writers.
I've always wanted to play Spike from CBB but less serious. Not lolrandumb but no tragic backstory, just your layabout martial artist who took up bounty hunting because a man's gotta eat and it's the easiest profession that doesn't require learning new skills
>>52769055
Jack is a meme character, newtard.
>>52769229
it is quickly reaching meme status but its understandable, its one of the few good action heroes we have seen in cartoons lately. sharing a table with that tries to play Rick sounds like it would get really annoying really fast.
>>52769229
>Anything that is popular is a meme regardless of quality.
>>52769055
You have that backwards.
>>52769277
No shit. Sharing a table with someone playing Rick while someone else ~tries~ to play Jack would be really annoying too.
Any character works, as long as it's done correctly.
Also, Rick and Jack would work pretty well. After all, Rick has no problems being friendly with stoic philosophical people.
I'm not even sure how you would combine Rick and Jack. They're fundamentally different people.
There's more to a character than whether or not they're pessimistic.
>Inquisitor Headsmash.
>Ahzek Ahriman.
I-I'm not sure how this would work....
>>52769155
It's a funny show. I don't watch it for the philosophy [spoilers]cuz it's crap[/spoilers]
>>52769524
Well, I mean it's written by an asshole depressed alcoholic. He's going with what he knows.
This, combined with,
>>52769764
This.