Why are magical warriors almost alwayw paladins?
What is wrong with sorcerous warriors?
>>52715816
>What is wrong with sorcerous warriors?
Nothing.
>>52715816
What system?
(Before everyone assumes D&D 3.5)
>>52715816
Magical Rangers are common as fuck bruv. DnD Clerics are arguably warriors with magic too, since they tend to be on the front lines with heavy armour and hitting things. Eldritch Knights and Swordmages certainly aren't unknown either.
>>52715816
Wiedzmin kurwa
>>52715816
Bards in certain systems also cast spells while wearing light/medium armor and using martial weapons. There's a ton of non-pally mage-warrior types.
>>52715816
2nd ed AD&D you have the multiclass fighter/mage. its effective but you really have to set up each class as a compliment to the other and not just a fighter and a mage in one sheet
>Magical warriors with their powers not from the Lord
>>52715816
Magic warrior you mean.
Paladins aren't 'magical' in the traditional sense, they use divine powers and lose them if their deity says so.
>What is Elric the post.
>>52715816
Because they want to be moralfags and feel righteous but not explain themselves beyond "DEUS VULT".
>What is wrong with sorcerous warriors?
Nothing.
>>52715816
Significant lack of morals to tell them that setting that building full of orphans on fire to kill the goblin terrorists is a bad thing to do.
>>52715816
>What is wrong with sorcerous warriors?
Intensified Shocking Grasp Spellstrike Spell Combat spam
>>52720043
That makes a good villain though.
>>52720147
>Damage
>Mattering