Is leather "breastplate"+ chainmail skirt the most

File: 1438050111619.jpg (3MB, 3000x3000px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3000x3000px

>>52128190

If someone is wearing a bikini on an adventure, chainmail or otherwise, logic is obviously less important than aesthetic in the setting and story.

And you know what? That's fine. I am entirely okay with dumb bikini armour and stuff if it's well designed and used appropriately in an over the top fantasy setting. Attempts to justify it just annoy me at this point. It's dumb. Accept that it's dumb, and enjoy it for what it is.

Whatever you need to do to justify your magical realm OP, but that's a nice goddam picture.

>>52128190
Armor bikinis only work if it's 1. A very hot climate where people are gonna be sweating their assess off and 2. Only worn for gladiator/ceremonial fights where the point is to put on a good show with lots of blood, not actual protection.

Dune applied this even further, with gladiators using half-shields that purposefully only projected the force field around half their body, in addition to fighting shirtless with swords.

Wearing an armorkini into a dungeon is stupid. If you want to be scantily clad, pick a caster and fluff your starting outfit as revealing, with Mage Armor it doesn't matter anyways.

File: 1480577501370.jpg (257KB, 1280x905px) Image search: [Google]

257KB, 1280x905px

>>52128256

Alternatively, this.

File: tumblr_munl6wtL1w1sl6y7ro5_1280.jpg (140KB, 750x1000px) Image search: [Google]

140KB, 750x1000px

hopefully nobody minds if I just post armoured bikinis?

File: 96bb528b5f6704cfcc9cc987cd2c862f.jpg (372KB, 1303x2100px) Image search: [Google]

372KB, 1303x2100px

>>52128335

Yeah, I really like the lighting.

>>52128190
Why not just not wear armor

File: f9975f0aab59d4af4d54995740ad7910.jpg (353KB, 689x1000px) Image search: [Google]

353KB, 689x1000px

>>52128337
>If you want to be scantily clad, pick a caster and fluff your starting outfit as revealing, with Mage Armor it doesn't matter anyways.
One of my players did this for his (male) sorc. His character is bi and has caught the eye of a male wizard NPC. Their relationship is currently developing it's really fuckin' cute

File: 016-mustsee-concept-art-bayardwu.jpg (120KB, 540x713px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 540x713px

>>52128472

Y'know, this thread could use some more cute wizard boys too.

File: 348721-9hr.jpg (1007KB, 1800x1800px) Image search: [Google]

1007KB, 1800x1800px

The best you can say in practical terms is that it's better than nothing, but not by much.

>>52128337
>Armor bikinis only work if it's 1. A very hot climate where people are gonna be sweating their assess off

Maybe I'm remember my desert and rain forest fashion wrong, but don't they typically wear more (and light weight) clothes due to the risk of sunburn, bugs and shit? Wouldn't it make more sense in a more temperate climate where the average late spring-to-early-fall temperatures are where it would more comfortable to be in less clothing?

File: 998535ecb1cea6735b6adf92553c129c.jpg (178KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1024x768px

>>52128561
>>52128592
>Boris Vellejo

GOAT

File: 2224562dcfdf16ecc7169d5f956b56c6.jpg (30KB, 461x639px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 461x639px

>>52128496
Shortly after their first kiss or maybe their first night together I'm going to kill the wizard off. The player is fully expecting him to die, but he isn't sure when.

File: 397434_1357502917_orig.jpg (412KB, 1132x1600px) Image search: [Google]

412KB, 1132x1600px

>>52128650

Perhaps it could develop as a ceremonial garment? Stranger things have been worn in the name of religion...

File: 1439922883162.jpg (319KB, 809x989px) Image search: [Google]

319KB, 809x989px

>>52128666
>>52128560
>>52128687

Can you not? Women in realistic armour is all well and good, but there's a time and a place. It's kinda shitty to just start posting it where it isn't appropriate.

>>52128690
Or... or... or...

Subvert the shitty GM trope, and just leave him in suspense the entire game. then kill the wizard off in the epilogue just as the PC begins to think his husbando is safe.

>>52128690

Feels like a bit of a waste to me, but then I generally dislike how kill happy most GMs are with NPCs. It's a waste of potential future plot hooks for cheap drama in the now.

File: Skirt.jpg (59KB, 347x500px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 347x500px

>>52128710

>>52128718
That's actually a really good idea. I've even got the monster who'll do the killing picked out.
>>52128722
Well, it's Curse of Strahd

File: 2a4afabfd02ef78a8d7b16bb20f4395a.jpg (494KB, 800x1143px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 800x1143px

>>52128754

I'm curious, why did you even click on this thread? From the topic it should be very obvious it's not something that appeals to you, so why do it?

Is your only purpose in this to spoil other peoples fun? Do you actively seek out things you dislike and try to make it worse for other people because you have nothing better to do? That's kinda sad.

File: VNyk86k.png (651KB, 1067x800px) Image search: [Google]

651KB, 1067x800px

>>52128796
>Do you actively seek out things you dislike and try to make it worse for other people because you have nothing better to do?

File: nmdjj7.jpg (109KB, 600x768px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 600x768px

My Google fu is lacking. Anyone have the next image in the set?

File: newmodelarmy2_jvYJaZz.jpg (215KB, 760x596px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 760x596px

>>52129150

File: newmodelarmy3.jpg (143KB, 760x596px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 760x596px

>>52129170

File: 60775c0a7e4ecaa4bf2063587c9c2903.jpg (60KB, 540x720px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 540x720px

>>52128256
>>52128337
This

>>52128190
There are ways to make armor sexy anon. The disc nipple armor of slavs with a softer, light quilted armor beneath, the horse rider split skirt... Now if the goal is simply to expose skin, a full breastplate and nothing else would make more sense than chain bikini.

>>52128643
It's a matter of humidity.

The extreme lack of in deserts, plus the sun, makes long clothes good.

Rainforests, jungles and so, it would actually make sense to forget the bikini and have a thong at most. Even the brass mix of chain and plate of austronesians was much lighter than their indian/middle-eastern counterparts.

File: isaywekillheronprinciple.jpg (236KB, 727x1080px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 727x1080px

>>52129029

>>52129228
>Alternate Title "The group purposely try to stop the DMPC from joining the group."

>>52129185
>Rainforests, jungles and so, it would actually make sense to forget the bikini and have a thong at most.

idk

maybe it's just because I've never been to the rain forest (I'm in West Virginia, so I got woods and forests a plenty), but I always figured I'd prefer to have light but long clothes in tropical areas because dealing with bugs (such as mosquitos, or the settings' equivalent) is a pain in the ass and I wouldn't want to risk malaria or some other random disease/illness every time I stepped outside (even if it meant feeling miserable at times).

File: yuan ti OFFICIALLY have tits.jpg (147KB, 820x580px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 820x580px

I find your lack of snake babes disturbing

>>52129534
It's not a question of comfort, it's to avoid death by heatstroke. Wet clothes in high humidity are basically blankets, and you WILL pass out if you try any strenuous activity dressed like that.

Go grab a Natural Geographic and look at the various Amazon natives. Thongs, thongs, thongs. Always and without exception you'll find them wearing the bare minimum needed to keep their dongs from flopping around and nothing more.

File: marril_by_foxy_sketches-d30papf.jpg (164KB, 800x1127px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 800x1127px

Bone bikini

File: fa04c29914ffb64269f58bd066754bafc2387898.jpg (189KB, 689x1000px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 689x1000px

For a change of pace, gonna do some necromancers

File: MdGWVQS.png (579KB, 734x525px) Image search: [Google]

579KB, 734x525px

>>52128710
Screw you! I want realistic armour!

You know, ones that depict an idealised form of the wearer's naked chest.

>>52129029
She kills them both.

File: sexy evil necromancer (smite improvised weapon - dick).jpg (71KB, 675x804px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 675x804px

Here's a practical reason for dressing skimpy: it's very easy to have a flirtatious, playful romance with one of the heroes. When they inevitably beat you, that one will most likely make the others spare your life.

File: 1254475484855.jpg (449KB, 1202x1280px) Image search: [Google]

449KB, 1202x1280px

The most important stat is the sexy stat.

>>52130410
Man, that guy in the middle is hot.

>>52130410
>woman on the left has her pantyhose halfway down her thighs
Good thing she has people to do the walking for her.

>>52130543
>left
right

File: 1435914387382.jpg (422KB, 854x720px) Image search: [Google]

422KB, 854x720px

>>52130543
I hope you're not trying to bring logic into this thread.

File: __leina_queen_s_blade__231dad16da48bc8068350976c12b550a.png (580KB, 713x974px) Image search: [Google]

580KB, 713x974px

>>52128190
>logical chainmail bikini
No such thing, Stu. If you want sexy scantily clad warrior women in your magical realm, then fuck logic/realism and have sexy scantily clad warrior women, dammit! You can't have your cheesecake and appease the anti-sexualization crowd at the same time, so don't bother.

I'm gonna fap, who cares

File: Fantasy armor.jpg (356KB, 1200x768px) Image search: [Google]

356KB, 1200x768px

>>52129029

File: 1489002366479 [www.imagesplitter.net].jpg (81KB, 1280x830px) Image search: [Google]

81KB, 1280x830px

Anyone got a sauce on this? ^

>>52128190

If you want bikini mail, then your best bet is to have magical armor and or armor spells. Then the sexy looks are just cosmetic, or maybe making the fashion statement that you're rich/powerful enough to not need full coverage of physical armor.

>>52131101
> THICC
> Dwarflady
> Nobeard

Oh Lawdy is I in Heavin'?

>>52129228
>>52129029
>"I say we rape her mercilessly on principle"

>>52128190
Logical? In a tabletop game? Fuck that!

Scifi setting? Personal shield generators.
Fantasy setting? Magical shield generators.
Modern setting? Fuck, why are you playing goddamn modern, you shit, what are you role playing as? Action accountants? Are you running an illegal border crossing simulator? We play games to escape goddamn reality!

>>52130543

It's like some kind of ultra tight skirt that's torn at the top, not pantyhose.

Speaking from experience here, you can still walk in ultratight dresses provided they are flexible enough and still have a degree of elasticity but there is an artform to it, it isn't comfortable unless you like the feeling of bondage and you are reduced to a snails' pace.

But then logic tends to take a back seat in fetishwear.

>>52128190
There is no bikini armor that is logical, they are all equally retarded and wouldn't even work in a fucking desert.

>>52131596
What, you just want the tits flopping about? So do I but a bikini or some other boulder holder is really more practical than nothing.

>>52131638
Wrap them and then put on some robes. Loose fitting ones if you're in a desert so you're kept warm at night and can sweat and cool off in the day. Wearing fuck-all for clothes is only reasonable in a heavily forested jungle with 80% humidity. In anything without heavy foliage however, you'll have to worry about sun burns and skin cancer.

>>52128907
Where is my wargame based off the art of Biz?

>>52131678

What if you're in a setting where realism isn't a concern?

File: dwayne-the-rock.jpg (71KB, 564x563px) Image search: [Google]

71KB, 564x563px

>>52130044
The Rock wearing an Idealized form of his torso.

It is less muscular than reality.

File: d3f8499cbed1c485e316b12c638988f2.jpg (445KB, 608x846px) Image search: [Google]

445KB, 608x846px

You will need more to cover from the rain.

>>52131884
>covering from the rain
>not using it to enhance your appearance
Low-Style pleb.

>>52131716
Then it's idiotic by nature. It's not just realism, it's common sense. Running around in a bikini is nothing more than magical realm and like any other retarded dress not befitting the environment, stamped out.

>>52131918

...Common sense that is rooted in, you know, realism.

Settings exist in which aesthetic and style is more important than any consideration of the environment or reality. And you might not like them, but some people do, and they're fine.

>>52131939
There is no time where bikini attire is ever sensible in any setting unless there are absolutely retarded and arbitrary reasons, and again, almost always degenerate magical realm bullshit which ought to be kept off the table and in the bedroom. The best red flag for any character as a DM is if they aren't fully dressed. Or wearing a skintight body suit in something that isn't Cyberpunk.

File: e3bad9cb3bc02685b48a365f902de552.jpg (613KB, 707x1000px) Image search: [Google]

613KB, 707x1000px

>>52131899
Can't argue against those dub so I will give two lady away

>>52131918
>>52131988
It's obviously magical realm, but that doesn't mean it couldn't make sense in-universe.

>>52131988

So, basically, because you don't like it and don't understand it or why it appeals, it is badwrongfun which is never ever okay? Alright then.

>>52131884
If you don't have anything waterproof and all your clothes are going to be completely drenched, might as well be wearing less.

>>52131988
You sound like the typical That Guy on this topic with your standards for magical realm as it pertains to necessarily pervy material in settings. Conan, Red Sonja, hell even John Carter from Mars (a very clothing optional planet). A vast majority of the historical scifi and fantasy genre, even to the modern day. For instance there were many reasons to walk out on the movie Prometheus but if you stormed towards the exit screaming, "MAGICAL REALM BULLSHIT SETTING!" then heaven help you.

Now you might counter, "But those are movies and books, I'm talking about tabletop games!" by all means please don't bother because demanding more realism in a damn game than in any of the settings that might inspire it, that's just ridiculous.

I mean seriously, do you imagine everyone jacking off under the table just because someone is making a nod to any particular setting?

File: 17m8dpff8zitejpg.jpg (67KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 800x600px

>>52132116
My problem with the Prometheus space suits oddly enough wasn't the slinky form fitting quality but the ridiculous total glass dome that yes tended to smash each time someone tripped over.

Not a huge problem, though, since it was clearly to show off the actor inside rather than be anything close to practical.

File: image.jpg (61KB, 408x439px) Image search: [Google]

61KB, 408x439px

>>52131988
>liking bikinis
>degenerate
Pick one

File: 1488995755475.jpg (331KB, 796x832px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 796x832px

>>52131884
Wear a nice cloak on top that you can cast open and use as a back-splash accent to your outfit, or cast off seductively.
Imagine being in a cozy tavern room when a woman walks in wearing a huge comfy blanket, then casts it open and reveals almost everything underneath, warm, buxom, and ready for reclining by the fire...

>>52128889
>That filename

>>52132116
The suits in Prometheus weren't magical realm. Real life next gen space suits are going to be skin tight or at least tighter, and they didn't look sexual at all.

Something that exposes large chunks of flesh however is inherently sexual. And having experience with the people who tend to roleplay characters like that, they're horrible and best thrown out by any self-respecting GM before they creep everybody else out.

>>52132398
>Something that exposes large chunks of flesh however is inherently sexual. And having experience with the people who tend to roleplay characters like that, they're horrible and best thrown out by any self-respecting GM before they creep everybody else out.

The only reason it's considered sexual is because it's sexualized in the media and you've been conditioned by both your parental figures and said media. If you can't control your dong and get a hard-on just from seeing some bare skin, that's a you problem.

>>52132398
What the hell space suit designs were you looking at that included slick rubberized surfaces, because I'm pretty sure you got punked. Sure there's some less bulky stuff being designed (there's actually multiple competing suits, including one that's been dubbed the Buzz Lightyear) but none of them look like sexy diving suits.

File: b987c5efd1202539feece45fb1c492c3.jpg (76KB, 571x593px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 571x593px

>>52132485
Buzz.

File: space_suit_630.0.jpg (158KB, 630x857px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 630x857px

>>52132502
Boeing's new suits.

File: 11229316174_4445e63551_b.jpg (22KB, 717x478px) Image search: [Google]

22KB, 717x478px

>>52132507
This is probably the "sexiest" but if you like something that looks more felt-chic. It's nothing like the sexy "latex spacesuit" bits on the Prometheus models.

>>52132507
I...guess that's sexy? Gave that dude a suspicious cameltoe so hurray for science. Right?

>>52128256
I was going to be upset about that undertit armor (and I am), but then I saw that the individual finger armor is completely detached and just slipped on her fingers and that makes me more upset than not being able to just see her topless. Fuck that shit; does she expect them not to immediately fly off in battle or not just fall off when she puts her hands down?

What about a setting where that impractical armor can exist but only if it's enchanted to defy physics in the way it does first?

>>52132566
Dude, those finger spikes aren't armor, they're WEAPONS! She flings them into people's faces like a true badass! Then garrotes them with her g-string! LIKE A TRUE WARRIOR!

>>52132446
It's sexualized because culture considers it sexual, and therefore it is sexual per norms.

>>52128849

You know I like this thread.
I also like realistic armour.
But that tit-bridle weirdly offends me.
Looks like she's gonna turn around and let
this asshole have it with both hind feet.

>>52128892


This pretty is kind of on the verge of actually being functional.
Give her greaves and do something about that gap which still allows for flexibility and she's good to go.

On Barsoom you rely on speed and swordsmanship because nothing is going to stop the bullet from a radium rifle.

>>52129115

Again, this is getting pretty practical.
legs are free for movement.

>>52132676
Hey, he paid good beads to Horse for the promise of turning his waifu into a centaur. Sure she's not 100% happy about it, but look at that handprint on her side. Oh yeah, she likes it sometimes. Very sensitive horse bits!

There, that should offend anti-magical realm people, magical realm people, and also people who cringe at the idea of native americans knowing about centaurs and horses weren't even native to the Americas.

>>52130284
Clearly, because those two clanking idiots botched their perception rolls. People laughing at Cohen the Barbarian because he looks like a frail old man don't live long to regret it because any adventurer who SURVIVES to a ripe old age will know every single trick to fucking you up, most of which he probably invented. Similarly if you see a glamazon coming at you and laugh at how much of her skin is exposed what you aren't realizing is that if she can dress like that and still be alive no amount of metal you wrap yourself in is going to save you.

>>52128190
The only logical chainmail bikini setup is mail over a gambeson where both have been destroyed in places, making the outfit revealing.

All I ever ask of a design for armor is that it is internally consistent and that, if it is tied to stats, be representative of said stats.

>>52128374
A bikini that's just a bikini is internally consistent.

>>52129115
Armor that doesn't cover everything, but seems to do its intended purpose, is internally consistent.

>>52131101
Things that aren't armor (per se) but are protection for certain points that take wear, are internally consistent. This picture is not entirely in line with that, but it's the best example.

>>52128796
Things that look like they're magical and are used as armor, are internally consistent. Just slap some runes on some surface and anything goes.

>>52130568
>>52130610
>>52128798
Outfits that drastically change between the heavy armor look and 'nothing at all', are not internally consistent.

>>52130444
>>52128653
>>52128561
>>52128256
Outfits that are entirely meant for ceremonial purposes, artistic statement or to beautify the wearer are internally consistent.

>>52128190
I don't remember the last time non-legendary level equipment could protect me more than basic armor spells.
Martials are shit and so are their inadequate means of protecting themselves.

What if it's a monster girl whose skin is tougher than armor everywhere except the parts covered by the armored bikini?

>>52129764
I thought that only rape-ti had lizard tities.

A take on the bikini armour that I actually liked was that it was just the orc version of lingerie or a fancy dress+jewelry if it was more modest.

>>52128426
This one is somewhat justifiable, since too much armour would not help with swimming.

>>52132541
>I...guess that's sexy?
Looks too much like a full-body diaper that comes in designer colors.

>>52128472
I once played a Sidereal who was bi who was friends with a warrior woman who was also bi there was a whole sexual tension thing as he pursued her and she gradually grew to like him. And they each hooked each other up with a one-night stand on one occasion.

>>52129836
How much can one rip off a (fairly distinct) character design from a published work (Blackrose from .hack//) and still call it original?

>>52132446

>it's conditioned and has nothing to do with biology!

This is either really good bait or you're delusional.

>>52134906
>biology
Biologically speaking, humans have spent 99% of their existence naked. Nudity is NOT inherently sexual.

File: jomaro-kindred-shasta-origin.jpg (303KB, 1000x1746px) Image search: [Google]

303KB, 1000x1746px

>>52128907
Shoo ants.

My favorite version is where the characters start out the adventure dressed normally in standard medieval fantasy gear, but for whatever reason end up in exoticstan, lose all their clothes and have to go native. Bikinis, leotards and swimsuits for everyone, and banana hammocks for the men.

Forced to fight in the arena is another good use of it.

Sadly this happens far too seldom in fiction.

>>52132744
I believe there were horses in North America but they went extinct for a while. The current stock of horses were introduced by Europeans.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horses_in_the_United_States#Extinction_and_return

>>52128190
Chainmail on bare skin is going to cause more problems than good though.

>>52135011

I think you're missing the point that it's been sexual for a long time. No one is RP-ing pre-encephalized humans, so yes, scantily clad females are inherently sexual.

>>52130021
isnt this the lady from the edgy faction from that one edition of exalted?

>>52135199
A hundred generations is a very short time in evolution. You only think scantily clad females are inherently sexual because you've been conditioned to think about them sexually, not because they actually are.

>>52128796
>>52128710
Autism.

>>52135199
Yeah that's why abbos walked around with massive hard-ons all the time, seeing as everyone was naked.

>>52135249

Give me genus and species before you start lumping all humans into one pot.

>>52135011

And yet somehow people managed to have sex during all that time

>>52131988
>Or wearing a skintight body suit in something that isn't Cyberpunk

I'll take mechanical counterpressure for $500, Alex.

Style over substance can include sexy garb for many reasons, though not for combat conditions. But a skintight bodysuit has practical application in hard sci fi.

To me, the real problem is that even if you assume (magical or technological) Transhuman so everyone is hot enough that putting them in bikinis isn't cringy, you're ruining the sensual thrill of forbidden need and revealing hidden territory. A girl in a bikini is often sexier than that same girl just standing there naked. And the girl in the gauzy sun dress is way sexier than she is in the bikini. That's because the clothes invite your mind to undress her, and the fantasy of what she might look like naked is usually better than the reality.

So we don't put a girl in a burkha, but we also don't have her stark nekkid. We put her in clothes that flatter and invite attention to her best assets, revealing enough to get your imagination going but not so revealing that there's no mystery. So either tight clothes that cover a lot, or gauzy/lacy numbers that show a lot but in a blurry way, or something that teases you with revealing stuff (like a short skirt or cleavage), or teases you with how easily it might be removed like overalls or a sun dress. The southern wild girl look (knotted shirt and denim shorts) gives you several at once, especially implied ease of removal.

My issue has always been the use of metal. It seems like it would be really uncomfortable. If you're not concerned with protection, why not just use cloth or fur? The underwire in a bra is already sometimes a pain, even more metal clinging tightly to the body would be even worse.

>>52132522

Dava Newman is a national treasure.

Yeah it's skintight but not classically sexy... But remember that this is a prototype. Decades of use, advanced materials and designs, and fashion considerations can all justify getting a little giggity.

>>52135411
>And the girl in the gauzy sun dress is way sexier than she is in the bikini. That's because the clothes invite your mind to undress her, and the fantasy of what she might look like naked is usually better than the reality.
Speak for yourself, my desire is to rip the clothing off her. Although completely sheer lingerie is better than naked.

File: f3f79342d41e52ebe4a20dcb8254c37a.jpg (69KB, 564x797px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 564x797px

>>52130543
Personally I like generally covered bodies with cleavage, like pic related. A bare midriff is fine too.

>>52135992
meant for >>52135411 and >>52135466

>>52133076
It's internally consistent if everyone in the setting does it.

>>52133076
>interal consistency
Literally one of the biggest memes in fantasy.

>>52131754
Well what do you expect from the son of Zeus?

>>52132161
They're actually working on form-fitting spacesuits in reality. Lighter and easier to move in, take up less space, cools you naturally through prosity, and also keeps you in should it get torn anywhere.
The helmets really should be plastic rather than shatter-prone glass, though.
The worst hollywood bit is the enlarged helmet domes with lights pointing towards the face to satisfy union rules. 'PEOPLE GOTTAH SEE MUH FACE OR THEY WON'T KNOW IT'S ME IN THUH SUIT MANG'

>>52128560
This is a terrible pic, and not just because the bitch is flat. Why even bother making a rapier that doesn't even reach a woman's waist? The pommel of that thing should rest somewhere between her armpit and neck.

>>52136502
Go bitch over here >>52127409, she's a Song of Swords character and they'll be happy to sword-sperg.

>>52131713
It was called Confrontation, and it was great.

>>52136519
No. Nobody who draws art of flat chested women deserves help. They NEED help, but from a psychologist.

>>52136502
Anon, that's a rigid chestplate. She's bound underneath.

>>52136103
Technically, yes. But, if they dress or armor themselves stupidly, that just makes it bad fiction.

File: 91_website_image_kykp_standard.jpg (390KB, 969x900px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 969x900px

>>52136387
Threads already dealt with that with pics to boot. Between >>52132507 and >>52132522 (which looks like she's prepared to go fencing) neither of which equals pic related. Reality will never be as sexy as Hollywood, and shouldn't really try. Form over function is a bad idea with dealing with space. Space doesn't fuck around and our kind of life is NOT well-designed for it.

>>52134496
Sexy camel toe though. Probably really surprised him to find out he could do that.

>>52130410
>all this space between their tits
You can't have breasts that big while ALSO being that perky and have space like that in between them.

>>52130610
You know that not everyone who thinks chainmail bikinis/Red Sonya #8239523479245 is some keyboard slamming SJW, right?

Some of us just want women in regular armour without Magical Realmist crying that we're killing their boners.

>>52128734
WO I setting with demons is actually not a bad idea

>demons exist in setting
>they are drawn to the mass-slaughter and the emotions it evokes on a scale never seen before
>governments from both sides cover it up, whilst having certain demonic packs themselves also to hide

>>52137192
Anon, that was drawn by an Asian. He doesn't know what tits look like, let alone big ones. Cut him some slack.

>>52136165
>memes
Yeah, no. Internal consistency has been referenced for decades as an important factor for any work of fiction to aid in suspension of disbelief.

>>52136918
If it's possible to cover or conceal the tits, they're not big. It's inarguably the best form of protection, but any woman who can fit into a man-type breastplate at all counts as flat, and hence disgusting and unfit for art.

>>52137105
The cameltoe is padding; any concave areas like the crotch or armpits need to be padded and filled, or the lack of compression from the suit means vacuum sucks them out to fill the concavity.

>>52137328
>any woman who can fit into a man-type breastplate at all counts as flat, and hence disgusting and unfit for art.
I want /r9k/ to leave

>>52137354
I have the feeling that your sense of humor is broken, if it ever existed.

>>52137105
>female suits are a shiny, rubbery material
>male suit looks like it's made out of the same material as my couch
This isn't fair

>>52137545
What is it about those suits? They don't really look too much more formfitting than >>52132522 but is it the glossiness? How slick they look? Not quite sure where the sexy is supposed to come from but yeah they look like the result of the /s/ latex thread working for NASA.

File: 5a008154d2d059583ac8150b31a703e0.jpg (272KB, 1300x867px) Image search: [Google]

272KB, 1300x867px

>>52137545
You've got a point, definitely not the same material for the dudes.

Guess Weyland Corp knows what's up.

>>52137545
Probably the men's space suits are actually protective. You don't bring women into space or anywhere because you want them to be useful and task-oriented, after all.

File: 52be1abe7b58eff96bd81595ba972510-1.jpg (226KB, 845x1280px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 845x1280px

>>52137711
If it makes you feel any better the original concept was more Mass Effect with super plastictanium armor bits.

File: Prometheus_Concept_Art_David_Levy_31a.jpg (132KB, 1280x1297px) Image search: [Google]

132KB, 1280x1297px

>>52137759
The dudes look a bit more...Crysis? Well, the right looks more Halo or at least Gears of War.

>>52137759
Nah, that makes me feel worse, not better. What would have made me feel better is a bikini space suit. If people can buy it for chainmail, why not, right?

>>52128734
Underappreciated

File: Barbarella-Costume-Silver-Bikini-Movie.jpg (143KB, 700x877px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 700x877px

>>52137857
It's not all about you, anon, but anyway here you go.

>>52133076

>>52130568 is definitely some sort of show fighter and I'd say on par with your last category. I see no reason why solid pieces of metal cannot also be "meant for ceremonial purposes, artistic statement or to beautify the wearer".

>>52138394
I can see where you could come to that conclusion. I disagree based on her boots and wrist/shoulder guards, but I can concede that she could fall under the last category.

>>52137328
>If it's possible to cover or conceal the tits, they're not big.
>human breasts are absolutely incompressible
I feel like you're baiting me into finding pictures of your fetish. gfycat /DeliciousBowedAlpinegoat

>>52131101
as for sauce, that's a character by R4.
http://r4drawings.tumblr.com/

>>52138535
>human breasts are absolutely incompressible
Actually they largely are incompressible, much like water. You can *deform* them (in the physics sense, not the maiming sense) but that just displaces the contents. If breasts are big there's just too much tissue and not enough space in the breastplate to displace it into -- you have to make a custom plate to make it work. (Plus, there's a limit to how much you can press and stretch breasts without it getting impractically painful.)

I ought to know, every girlfriend I've ever had has had tits at least as big as her own head. I've seen a couple of them try to bind as well and the effect was absolutely laughable. One was bi and kinda into drag (yeah, I eventually realized she had problems, 's why I dumped her) but could never ever pull off better than "F cups straining to get out of a man's shirt three sizes too big over the rest plus and an incongruous fake moustache". Cracked me the fuck up, but she got buttmad at me for it, like it was my fault she was blatantly female.

>>52132566
She secretly has sausage fingers. They're jammed in there to hide her shame. They're packed in so tight they are incredibly difficult to remove.

>>52135048
muh dick

>>52133076
>All I ever ask of a design for armor is that it is internally consistent and that, if it is tied to stats, be representative of said stats.
Maybe the nipple bits are strongly magnetic all sword hits are redirected towards them. And there can be no other armor because otherwise the magnetic field would be disrupted

>>52140589
even deadlier: the swords remain attached to the nipple armor, and the heroine can perform a tassel twirling motion to create a deadly rotating weapon out of it. With a swift pirouette she can throw the spinning swords back to the attacker

Absolutely undefeatable

>>52129764
>Mom? Dad?!
>Uh, darling-
>We're in the middle of something here
>But I had a bad dre-
>Back to your room!

>>52140787
>tfw you walk in on Mom sucking out Dad's life force

>>52133460
Yeah but in such a setting I'm sure all monster girls would have been tragically hunted to extinction by armorers. It's just not the kind of road you want to walk down.

>>52142451
Hey man, don't knock the life sucky sucky. It's the best you'll ever have, trust me. I'm a skeleton.

>>52128190

None of it makes sense cause it doesn't actually protect a vital area.

Since your heart is in the middle of your chest, and your lungs are not gona be fully covered.

The groin is useless.

And the worst thing about it the belly is fully open. Even in our current day a good stab in the stomach can lead to death via bleed out.

>>52135011
One of the very first tools invented was sewing needles.

>>52143285
Yes, but those needles were purely limited to genital piercings, which were also 100% non-sexual by ancient humanity.

>>52143165
You do realize you're trying to argue some semblance of reality about a chick who is clearly casting a magical orb from her hand? Reality, friend, is a bit thin in whatever setting she'd be from.

>>52140589
>Maybe the nipple bits are strongly magnetic all sword hits are redirected towards them.
see:
>Things that look like they're magical and are used as armor, are internally consistent. Just slap some runes on some surface and anything goes.

And, if they have the technology to make something like that, then why not make a shield for that so you can block magnetizable metals and all other things that are used to kill you?
If you say, that it's just what is the norm in this setting, I refer you to another reply to my post.
>>It's internally consistent if everyone in the setting does it.
>Technically, yes. But, if they dress or armor themselves stupidly, that just makes it bad fiction.

If one wants it sexy, just make it look sexy. If one wants it to be magical, make it look magical. If one wants it to be practical, mundane protection, then make it look like it can do that. These aren't mutually exclusive, one just has to put more effort to make it work.

File: you-have-died-of-dysentery.jpg (50KB, 473x325px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 473x325px

I have to wonder if all the people crowing about whether things are realistic are running their games with proper realism accounted for complete with daily Save Vs Death roll against dysentery, or a strict vitamin c requirement in player diet during dungeon crawls, or modern shooters where even if kevlar stops a bullet you have to roll to see if, for instance, the impact broke a rib and sent it into the player's lung.

Hell, let's take that kevlar bit and expand on it. Is it okay to just slip on a vest and consider your character good to go, or does the GM require the player fully cover themselves like a member of the bomb squad complete with helmet and full face visor before they're properly armored? I suppose it shouldn't be surprising that a mere bikini triggers people when we have people who flip their shit if character art doesn't include a helmet with faceplate.

I've got no problem with people playing realism, there's plenty of games that make a reputation on trying to be as realistic as possible. People want to play those kinds of games then good on them. But requiring every player and every game to conform to how YOU want to play and what YOU view is acceptable is the quintessential definition of That Guy, only worse because it's expanded to games you aren't even involved in directly. There's an obnoxious extremism on each side of this all-too-frequent debate. People who act like sexy armor offends their very sense of reality and justice in the world and act like every game with a bikini is automatically an ERP (or for that matter the weirdos who claim boob armor will always automatically redirect a bullet or arrow directly into the heart), and those who demand their character can be sexy or else their freedoms are being tyrannically crushed. Both types of games and everything in between are okay! If you are in a group that doesn't like how you like to play, guess what, that is a sign that that probably won't be a group you'll enjoy playing with!

>>52144931
I'm pretty sure you know this but "realism" never ever means "realism". It means something more along the lines of "not breaking my extra speshul suspension of disbelief".

>>52144984
I'm sure it's a TL;DR situation but I'd hope I made that clear by the third paragraph.

File: 40197230_p0.jpg (676KB, 1323x935px) Image search: [Google]

676KB, 1323x935px

Order in which you want to protect your body parts:
1) head
2) chest and belly
3) everything else

If you can only buy one piece of armour, you'll get a helmet. If you can afford a few patches of chainmail after you've got your helmet, you'd want it to cover as much of your torso as possible.

If you want to translate this into fetish armour, you'd therefore want a chainmail bikini first and foremost. Maybe make it a plate bikini with a bit of mail hanging down from it to cover some of the belly*, like this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mail_and_plate_armour

Your legs would not be a priority until you've got your torso well-armoured. Chainmail also tended to be very expensive, moreso than generic plate most of the time, so a poor character who can only afford some scrap metal would be looking to get splinted greaves to protect their legs rather than something like a mail skirt.

*mail without padding is actually worth shit but y'know

>>52144722
It's kind of funny, I guess. When I started playing tabletop games it was with groups that didn't have requirements for character art. If people wanted it or just verbally describe their character that was fine. How did such blatant anarchy work? By the true magic known as the Power of Imagination™. I may imagine my brother's cleric as a fat Friar Tuck, he may imagine his character as thin, bookish, or even ultra masculine. It's a shared story, sure, but it's also a personal story for each player with our own points of view that color events.

From a gameplay standpoint it works. It doesn't matter if your character art is the sexiest motherfucker available on google, if you fuck up your charisma roll you still fail to charm someone. A handsome character can have low charisma, an "ugly" person can have high charisma. Just as a half-orc character may be hated in human towns but be considered a prize beauty in orc communities. So if a player wants to view themselves as a super sexy animoo magical girl with a chainmail bikini in the privacy of their own heads that's fine. As long as the armor is marked as Chainmail in my DM notes I've got an armor rating for that.

I used to think that the way I played was just how it was done and the reason opinion seems to have changed was video game RPGs which offer an absolute image of the characters and everything in that world and the story. That maybe people don't value imagination the same way. But maybe I'm the one who was always weird. Damned if I know.

>>52145043
I've seen enough people argue adamantly against the point I thought they thought they were making that I just don't assume at this point.

File: 3L2QitD.jpg (474KB, 1046x1600px) Image search: [Google]

474KB, 1046x1600px

Thread is lacking sexy armor.

>>52145189

Dominant arm. If your dominant arm is hit, you might not be able to wield your weapon, then it's over for you. I might even venture so far as to say protecting your dominant arm comes before protecting your head, because your head is an arms length away from your wrist, which will be easy to slice off.

File: 1466372800694.jpg (139KB, 849x1309px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 849x1309px

>>52145306
Just for you, anon.

File: 31273744_p0.jpg (2MB, 1489x2105px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1489x2105px

>>52145378
Hm, good point. In OP's scenario that would translate to splinted bracers then, and a glove of some kind for the hand holding the weapon. (The other hand best be holding a shield.)

File: 1466409328058.jpg (52KB, 566x900px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 566x900px

>>52145460
Some scifi, I guess.

File: 1456757714761.jpg (147KB, 1218x655px) Image search: [Google]

147KB, 1218x655px

>>52145480

File: 1456773871819.jpg (62KB, 627x800px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 627x800px

Sexy robot armor.

>neck hydraulics exposed
>wires/tubing exposed
>joints exposed
>ridiculously spindly "spine" connecting upper and lower frames left exposed
>0/10 critical failure
>judges see fit to award +2 points, however, for attempt to draw sexy tie on chest

File: Screenshot from 2017-03-12 21-32-58.png (190KB, 683x183px) Image search: [Google]

190KB, 683x183px

>How could they possibly be effective in combat without real armor?
>It's just impossible.
>I'd better constantly point it out like an autistic sperglord.
>And bonus, it makes it sound like I'm standing up to sexism, so women will want to sleep with me as thanks for protecting them!
>Truly, I am the smartest person who ever lived.

>>52145618
That's like every wizard ever in some games. It's why being a low level wizard sucks ass but in high level gameplay playing anything else is pathetic.

File: 1457021136704.jpg (151KB, 765x1485px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 765x1485px

Stupid sexy frog player fails at armor class, news at 11.

File: 1457021881399.jpg (390KB, 960x1200px) Image search: [Google]

390KB, 960x1200px

>>52145963
Oh what the hell, one more joke frog post because I'm pretty sure this guy is totally acceptable as long as he has armor boosting spells.

File: tumblr_mxerogYeRE1swr0eao4_1280.jpg (56KB, 736x849px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 736x849px

>>52145502
What the heck, a little more scifi.

File: tumblr_n8944uvOi11swr0eao1_1280.jpg (97KB, 704x704px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 704x704px

>>52147771

File: tumblr_np1p007vpk1swr0eao10_1280.png (1MB, 927x1655px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 927x1655px

>>52147789
I suppose plainclothes in a gunfight count as long as belly is exposed?

File: 1319293280241.jpg (124KB, 1304x900px) Image search: [Google]

124KB, 1304x900px

>>52147811

File: 1457405441677.jpg (732KB, 2424x4000px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 2424x4000px

>>52147848

>>52128256
Repeating what I said in another thread,
>By RAW nothing prevents typically nonarmor items from having armor enchantments, there's no reason you couldn't have something like a tattoo give +5 AC and fire resistance
>I have no issue refluffing what armor is, I have no issue with a "magical" bikini acting like fullplate provided you can justify why it weighs so much, has the dex penalty, and spell failure chance

It really is a question of the setting more than anything else, does it fit the setting?
As long as it does I got no problem if your female fighter looks like Iron Tarkus or is armored in nothing more than an enchanted nipple piercing

>>52128190
a bikini chainmail is never logical...
except if you are playing a hooker

>>52137016
>If they dress or armor themselves in a manner that is stupid in real life but works well in setting, that just makes it unrealistic fiction.

>>52148059
What if you want to show off?

>>52145990
>I'm pretty sure this guy is totally acceptable as long as he has armor boosting spells.
Of course

>>52145502
I find her lack of ass disturbing

>>52153218
They took so much from her. The doctors. The government. The CONSPIRACY. Now she's taking it all back, with interest!

Coming in 2018: BOOTYQUEST

File: pzo9376_occultist_sm_by_bryansyme-db0uxv4.jpg (236KB, 776x1000px) Image search: [Google]

236KB, 776x1000px

>>52150956
This. I think if there's a concept of drawing magical powers from articles of clothing due some occult charisma mysticism, there might as well be the the opposite; drawing magic energies from nudity/showing off.

>>52153246
I'd fund it

File: dejah_thoris_by_alegarza-d4c5gnf.jpg (263KB, 900x1366px) Image search: [Google]

263KB, 900x1366px

>>52128256
This. This so hard.

Conan stories, Tarzan, Burroughs' Martian stories, etc, they're all perfectly valid fantasy worlds. They operate on a rule of cool. They're not SUPPOSED to be realistic medieval combat simulators, or GoT or whatever.

Case in point, my latest character uses this for her character art, because the whole world is a big magic iron age fantasy inspired by various pulp fantasy.

File: 3f6.png (2MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1920x1080px

>>52153260
>drawing magic energies from nudity/showing off.

>>52128256
This. Trying to justify bikini armor as literal armor is Hentai Kamen tier logic. Good as comedy, bad as everything else. There is nothing to shame for.

>>52129185
This.

I wish more settings made sexy armour be practical as well like this.

>>52130444
SPIKY VAG PLATE

>>52129185
>The disc nipple armor of slavs
What

>>52135048
Her sword is literally going to break the next time it hits something hard.

>>52128256
it use to bother me, than i started looking more at what people wear and realized it's not all that stupid. Im very cold-tolerant, in fact my brain works better in the cold, but when i see what people put on in the name of "fashion" in the middle of the winter i get shivers down my spine. Frankly, in a setting where magic is all around, bikini for women is nothing suprising, they can show off their assets and stay warm at the same time, what's not to like

>>52145502
Hoping the videogame is as good as that trailer.

>>52128190
>Leather breastplates are affordable
>chain mail is rare
What kind of setting are you playing in? Modern?

>>52139833
>http://r4drawings.tumblr.com/
based anon

>>52153342
Technically the life fibers draw more power by being in contact with MORE skin. The kamui are 100% life fibers, the strongest clothes ever made, and would already kill most people from a brief usage. They're skimpy because any more skin contact would be too strong for anyone to survive.

If you're gonna try and take it seriously I would just wear normal clothes with good freedom of movement.

Don't get me wrong, I fucking love chain mail bikinis but most attempts to 'justify' it mechanically in-universe are pretty laughable.

>>52155530
I liked how self-aware the game Age of Barbarian was in that regard. It was barely a bikini even, if that, but the character "had to take it off to not drown" when showering in a water-fall.

File: dd2938a41342470c276ce0645e9adf7d.jpg (499KB, 2200x2400px) Image search: [Google]

499KB, 2200x2400px

Did someone say
ERECT NIPPLES IN SKINTIGHT BODYSUITS
?

>>52156522

More people should.

File: da00c497871aa022d51206e00d588c0f.jpg (994KB, 3504x3534px) Image search: [Google]

994KB, 3504x3534px

>>52156993
Yes they should

File: 1476464144325.jpg (1MB, 1560x2099px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1560x2099px

Well considering I play in a high magic/superpowered fantasy setting in M&M characters can wear whatever they want and still be protected due to their abilities/stats
In fact one of the players is strait up a loincloth wearing barbarian and another is Magic Iron Man

>>52157140

Then your game is objectively terrible and you should quit before you give gamers an even worse reputation then they already have. The conduct of your group and groups like you are the worst thing about this hobby.

File: he_man_and_the_masters_of_the_universe__10_cover_by_popmhan-d6qi8ag.jpg (730KB, 1375x2088px) Image search: [Google]

730KB, 1375x2088px

>>52157286
>Then your game is objectively terrible
Why, because we are playing in a setting based off cartoons we loved as kids and old fantasy art from the 80's

>>52157447

Yes.

Also because you're enabling people to think that they shouldn't be ashamed about playing characters who are half-naked or more so.

You're supporting deviancy and you should feel ashamed.

>>52131918
Im sorry but you're retarded, people wear things that aren't practical all the time, it's called fashion. I don't see you complaining about Conan and his fucking loincloth, it's barbarian chic, deal with it or fuck off.

File: he_man_classic_by_odinoir-d5egwdm.jpg (105KB, 900x750px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 900x750px

>>52157482
Whatever faggot I'm gonna keep doin what I'm doin and you can keep sucking dick

My group is having fun playing a game and that's all that matters, It's not like guys are jerking off at the table it's just a guy who said "Hey, my character basically looks like He-man"

>>52157541
>>52157544

Don't reply to the trolls, friends anon.

>>52157559
I think these people actually believe this. And if it is bait then that's even more pathetic.

>>52157544
Man, you took his bait. You only have yourself to blame for this predictable outcome.

>>52153312
This reminds me that Edgar Rice Burrough's Estate sued Dynamite comics for, among other things, making Dejah look too pornographic with artwork similar to what you posted. Nevermind that Mars in his actual damn stories is almost entirely clothing optional!

Man the world is nuts these days...

>>52157631
Yup. The artwork actually made her TOO covered.

But yeah. Nutters gonna nut.

File: Princess_of_Mars_large.jpg (247KB, 675x1013px) Image search: [Google]

247KB, 675x1013px

>>52157712
Granted depicting them in visual media, even pulp covers, included more covering to keep society from collapsing in, I guess, a giant orgy because someone saw a nipple in public? You can find some more accurate covers with uncovered Dejah. The most common covering for her seems to be a jeweled bikini, though, so on those historical grounds claiming she was too pornographic was pretty silly.

File: e379336ff5bd59f62c2ffffec25d8c9c.jpg (53KB, 323x529px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 323x529px

>>52157952

File: michael_whelan_1-a_princess_of_mars-cover.jpg (291KB, 600x1002px) Image search: [Google]

291KB, 600x1002px

>>52157967
Censoring via convenient angle.

File: lgjcdb.jpg (423KB, 1505x1080px) Image search: [Google]

423KB, 1505x1080px

>>52157993
Honestly the jeweled bikini actually makes more sense, especially for a princess, than looking like a typical sunbather set upon by typical rape mutants.

File: bombshellcover.jpg (488KB, 900x1350px) Image search: [Google]

488KB, 900x1350px

>>52158025
Soaking up them ninth rays, mm baby. The only way to tan.

File: Iron-hard nipples.jpg (157KB, 413x538px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 413x538px

>>52154558
Realistic nipple armor was used by male slavs, anon.

http://web.archive.org/web/20050421070223/http://www.geocities.com/normlaw/page3.html

http://www.xenophon-mil.org/rushistory/medievalarmor/voye2.htm

http://www.xenophon-mil.org/rushistory/medievalarmor/russ29.htm

http://www.hobbylinc.com/orion-kievan-rus-infantry-xi-xiv-century-52-plastic-model-military-figure-1:72-scale-72032

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/236x/b8/14/97/b814974db281c3a95c8d8473501b8035.jpg

File: 3833619-warlord01-cov-jusko.jpg (548KB, 600x900px) Image search: [Google]

548KB, 600x900px

>>52158025
It's so very Heavy Metal Mars Edition, baby!

File: 9590195536_c19d0fe786_b-600x1005.jpg (143KB, 600x1005px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 600x1005px

>>52158139
At least the guy holding her is probably canonically naked.

Anyway this isn't a John Carter thread, per se. Still this, Tarzan, Conan, just the whole pulp genre is indelibly ingrained in the DNA of D&D and thus the lineage of tabletop games that came after. I can't swear we'd never have gotten these games without Conan but I also doubt they'd look the same.

Personally I have zero issues with Red Sonja armor or Conan-style barbarians charging in with little more than furry loincloths. I'd hardly require it but I can recognize it as part of the history and the legacy of these games. Not everyone has to feel that way, and that's fine too. There's all KINDS of games, after all. I'd hazard the majority didn't get into roleplaying just for completely 100% accurate historical recreation simulation (with dice!) and explore the far larger world of fantasy, alternate pasts, exploring strange futures, that they offer.

Honestly I don't know when nerds got so puritanical. Maybe it's an effort to avoid the stigma of sexual repressed social rejects. But fuck that, we're on goddamn 4chan. Why are we trying to project some higher sense of morality, grace, and purpose?

>>52130684
How much of an autistic loser do you have to be to get butthurt enough to make this image?

>>52158658
Let's see... According to my careful calculations you have to be exactly as butthurt as the person was who made the original image this second person built off of. Uncanny, I know, but that's science for you!

>>52158658
It could be argued that holding "dignified silence" against this sort of thing is the reason why to get imagery like this >>52157993
>>52158139
>>52158302
we have, nowadays, to turn to Japan.

File: 1c966f4d23c22f7e7b6e3e58fb663ed8.jpg (341KB, 719x1000px) Image search: [Google]

341KB, 719x1000px

>>52158302
>Maybe it's an effort to avoid the stigma of sexual repressed social rejects
But it's true

>>52158925
The irony of imagery like >>52157993 is that it's 100% accurate to the actual stories. On Mars you maybe wear a loincloth but most people settle for leather harnesses to adorn with emblems of rank and, of course, to hold weapons. Burrough's never really spent much time in lascivious details, it was just a fact of life on Mars.

>>52157482
This is pretty autismal even for deliberate bait, desu

>>52158658
>How much of an autistic loser do you have to be
Not at all actually, the guy who drew #2 is a well known Swedish RPG-scene cartoonist and humorist. It's a "joke", you may have heard of those. Yeah, it's at the expense of whiny puritans, but what's wrong with that?

You can look up "Bernard the Barbarian" if you want to see some of his other comics.

>>52158302

That Guy syndrome. No one wants to be outted as the sex deprieved loner who inject fetishes in nearly every thing

>>52158658
Anon, you sound pretty butthurt.

>>52161626
>wizards in bikinis
I need more of this

>>52162797
I'm quite positive that's not a bikini

>>52145215
I like it when people don't describe their character too much because in my group there will usually come a point when players start indirectly describing the PCs of other players and it makes the PCs a bit like collective creations.

>>52163167
>Party has a seductive female enchantress/charmer/whathaveyou
>The dwarf says she has a glorious soft beard
>The elf says she has the grace of a raindancer
>The human says she has a great rack
>The halfling says she has wonderfully hairy feet

>>52163167
I can see that. I'll never admit this to my group but good players aren't always good writers. They can make perfectly sound and smart decisions within a quest, but backstories have run the gamut between entirely incomprehensible to typical issues that pop up in mary sue fanfiction. No, I don't care if you claim your warrior is an exiled prince, I'm not giving you a damn retinue or a castle. Look up the word exile and then get back to me.

Don't get me wrong, I'm not anti-backstory and they don't necessarily cause problems (they have sometimes when a player is more interested in their own character than the quest and wants things to shift to explore their backstory), but neither are they an absolute necessity to playing quests. I'd rather players, especially inexperienced players, get their feet wet in the game. It's like those "What I made, what I played" threads. Very often characters wind up different from how people initially planned. That will come out (and hopefully naturally) as we play.

File: armor chart.jpg (38KB, 300x600px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 300x600px

>>52158302

>>52164754
But is it elfist? That's the real threat everybody ignores!

>>52164754
>>52164906
It's anti-everything but sex, it features only white cisgendered humans

Where are the asexual agendered Thri-kreen

>>52165570
In the ballpit with all the other special people

>>52165685
Baalpit/Bhaalpit.

File: 1414711677937.png (365KB, 500x1580px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 500x1580px

>>52164754
Get up with times, comrade.

I just give my players the simple guideline, "Be naked for all I care, but if your dumbass shows up in heels you better be the village bicycle as your background otherwise you're going to enjoy your face in the ground."

The best part was the lass who ran a bard, and literally slept her way to a queendom.

>>52128561
He came so close to not having to draw that dobby's butthole

>>52131918
>This fantasy isn't realistic enough for me

>>52128687
>That gap in the front so she could take a piss-
Oh wait she doesnt have a donger. Did she just piss in her armor or what?

>>52165894
Kek
It's her disgusted facial expression that really makes it