Hey, /tg/, I need a whole heap of reptilian monsters. Supernatural,

>>52030771
Bone naga
Naga
lamia

>>52030771
The imugi, a type of giant snake in Korean mythology. They're not dragons, but greatly desire to be one, and if they can acquire a Yeoujiu (a type of magic gem associated with the Cintamanni of Buddhist and Hindu myth) they can tranform into one. They have fierce appearances, but they're actually pretty benevolent creatures.

>>52030805
That's a mammal, bro.

>>52031437
Disregard this, I suck cocks.

>>52031437
False. Its a mammal-like reptile. Their ancestors would one day give rise to mammals, but they're not there yet.

File: Umok.png (4MB, 2451x3500px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2451x3500px

>>52030771
I hope that's enough.
https://abookofcreatures.com/category/reptiles/

File: dragons bane.jpg (358KB, 1000x1000px) Image search: [Google]

358KB, 1000x1000px

here is a thing that would eat a dragon

File: Deep One missionary.jpg (198KB, 540x730px) Image search: [Google]

198KB, 540x730px

technically it has scales

>>52031209
We need more Korean mythology in general. Imugi also vary in apparance to "fuckhueg anaconda" to "fuckhueg [SNAKE OF CHOICE TO THREAD ON]" to "legless/hornless Chinese dragon".

Orochi and tsuchinoko also count.

There's also the Mongolian desert worm, but it's more pissed off sea worm (I forget the name of the coastal worms that will bite you if pissed).

File: retrosaur-family-tree-final.png (879KB, 2000x2000px) Image search: [Google]

879KB, 2000x2000px

>>52030771
Retrosaurs are always good for this(as are Kaiju versions of them);

https://horrorflora.com/2016/11/15/atom-kaiju-file-bonus-a-guide-to-retrosaurs/

https://horrorflora.com/2017/01/21/atom-kaiju-file-bonus-a-guide-to-kaiju-and-yamaneon/

https://horrorflora.com/2017/02/22/atom-kaiju-file-bonus-reptodites/

>>52036645
must have a pretty slow metabolism if it only gets to eat once a year

File: beasts of the mesozoic.jpg (448KB, 1552x873px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 1552x873px

Ya don't mind if the scales are under feathers, do ya?

>>52037557
>Proto-avians
>Reptiles

>>52038252
honestly by modern science Reptile is kinda a meaningless term(kinda like how Fish is one as well these days)

File: Tanystropheus.gif (3KB, 526x262px) Image search: [Google]

3KB, 526x262px

I like these guys, they're just so implausible.

>>52038322
I mean taxonomically they're still a valid class but anything that looks slimey/scaley/slithery gets class a reptile by average people, much like how all insects are referred to as "bugs"

File: rjpalmer_dakotaraptor_jane_001_by_arvalis-d9ev6ij.jpg (1MB, 4455x1698px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4455x1698px

>>52038252
>and yet a proto-mammal was posted